Biomarkers for Identification of High-Risk Coronary Artery Plaques in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

Gitte Pedersen, Jonathan Nørtoft Dahl, Laust Dupont Rasmussen, Anne-Birgitte Garm Blavnsfeldt, Sidsel Hauge Böttcher, Matias Hauge Böttcher, Mette Nyegaard, Louise Nissen, Simon Winther
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.14.23295593

ABSTRACT

Background Patients with atherosclerotic plaques containing high-risk features have an increased likelihood of events and a worse prognosis. Whether increased levels of Troponin I (TnI) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are associated with the presence of high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques (HRP) is not well described. We assessed the association between 1) TnI and 2) CRP with quantified coronary plaque burden, luminal diameter stenosis, and HRP in patients with low/intermediate pre-test probability of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) referred for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).

Methods The CCTA from 1,615 patients were analyzed using a semiautomatic software for coronary artery plaque characterization. Patients with high TnI (>6 ng/L) and high CRP (>2 mg/L) were identified. Associations of TnI and CRP with plaque burden, stenosis (≥50% luminal diameter stenosis on CCTA), and HRP were investigated.

Results TnI and CRP were both positively correlated with total plaque burden (TnI rs=0.14, p<0.001; CRP rs=0.08, p<0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analyses, high TnI was associated with stenosis (OR 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.99, p=0.034), the presence of HRP (OR 1.79, 95% CI: 1.17– 2.74, p=0.008), and the subtypes of HRP; low attenuation plaque (OR 1.93, 95% CI: 1.24–3.00, p=0.003), and positive remodeling (OR 1.51, 95% CI: 1.07–2.13, p=0.018). For CRP, only stenosis and napkin ring sign correlated significantly.

Conclusion In patients with suspected CAD, TnI and CRP are associated with HRP features. These findings may suggest that inflammatory and particularly ischemic biomarkers might improve early risk stratification and affect patient management. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02264717

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE Using CCTA, our findings direct the focus toward plaque characteristics rather than just overall plaque burden, outlining that the presence of stenosis and specifically HRPs may be more important in CAD risk evaluation than the amount of atherosclerosis alone. Our findings suggest that biomarkers can help identify patients with HRP features, which previously were shown to increase the risk of future events. TnI may have a place in pre-test evaluation of patients with stable chest pain by introducing biomarkers to a pre-test clinical likelihood model, which may pave the way for more accurate risk stratification and, consequently, better-informed clinical decision-making. Still, trials on biomarker-guided diagnostic testing and medical therapy in de novo stable chest pain patients are warranted.

INTRODUCTION

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a widespread cause of morbidity and mortality. In patients with suspected CAD, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a first-line non-invasive test with high diagnostic accuracy of obstructive disease.1 In general, patients with de novo symptoms suggestive of obstructive CAD show favorable prognosis,2 however CCTA is able to identify non-obstructive coronary plaques, plaque burden, and high-risk plaque (HRP) features which predict adverse cardiovascular events.3–5 Positive remodeling, low attenuation plaques, napkin ring sign, and spotty calcifications are examples of HRP features which often serve as culprits in later coronary events.3, 4, 6 Similar to the presence of HRP, cardiovascular risk factors, inflammation, and myocardial ischemia increase event rates.7, 8

To improve identification of patients with de novo chest pain and elevated risk of cardiovascular events, several biomarkers have been suggested.8, 9 Troponin I (TnI) detects myocardial necrosis and cell death, and C-reactive protein (CRP) low-grade inflammation, both linked to CAD events7, 10, 11 Yet, the relationship between these biomarkers with plaque burden and HRPs is not well described therefore existing findings warrant validation, and clinical thresholds for TnI and CRP to predict coronary characteristics to enable patient-specific risk stratification remain undetermined.12 In general, usage of circulating biomarkers could potentially improve early risk stratification and patient management of patients with de novo symptoms suggestive of obstructive CAD.

This study investigated if TnI and CRP are associated with plaque burden, stenosis, and HRP on CCTA.

METHODS

Patients and study design

This was a sub-study of the Danish study of Non-Invasive testing in Coronary Artery Disease (Dan-NICAD) 1 trial. The study protocol and main results were previously reported.13, 14 Patients were enrolled from September 11th 2014 until March 31th 2016 and inclusion and exclusion criteria are described in supplemental table 1. In short, the trial was designed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of different second-line non-invasive tests after CCTA with suspected stenosis using invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve (FFR) as reference for obstructive CAD. Blood was sampled at the day of CCTA, and CCTAs were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed post hoc at a core lab facility to evaluate plaque burden, stenosis, and HRPs. Patients were excluded if blood samples were missing or CCTA had poor image quality or was not performed.

Patients provided informed consent. The study was approved by The Danish Data Protection Agency and the Central Denmark Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Data collection

Biochemistry, risk factors, medication, and medical history data were obtained prior to CCTA through interviews by trained nurses and electronic medical records. Blood was sampled on the day of the CCTA.

Analyses of High-sensitive C-reactive protein and High-sensitive Troponin I

Lithium-heparin plasma samples were collected from all patients before the administration of X-ray contrast medium and stored at -80°C until time of analysis.14

High-sensitivity TnI and high-sensitivity CRP were measured with the High-Sensitivity Troponin I (TNIH)-analysis chemiluminescence immunoassay (ADVIA Centaur® XPT, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) and turbidimetric assay (CardioPhaseTM High-Sensitivity C-reactive protein (ADVIA® Chemistry XPT, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics)), respectively. Both commercially available and clinically used. The clinical cut-off for potential myocardial injury was 47 ng/L, while the analytical measuring interval for both assays was 3-35,000 ng/l and 0.2-200 mg/l, respectively.

Analyses were performed in the internationally accredited laboratory at the Department of Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (DS/EN ISO/IEC 15189).

Grouping of High-sensitive C-reactive protein and High-sensitive Troponin I

Using cut-off values based on limit of detection and previous studies,15 TnI were divided according to the cut-offs at 3.0 ng/L and 6.0 ng/L stratifying patients into three groups as low (<3.0), moderate (3.0-6.0); and high (>6.0) ng/L. Similarly, using cut-off values specified from previous studies, CRP was divided into three groups with cut-off at 1 mg/L and 2 mg/L stratifying patients into three groups as low (<1.0); moderate (1.0-2.0); and high (>2.0) mg/L.11, 16

CT-acquisition

Scans were performed on a 320-slice volume CT scanner (Aquilion One, Toshiba Medical Systems, Japan) as per the study protocol.14 Sublingual nitroglycerin and beta-blockade were administered to achieve a heart rate <60 beats/min.

Analysis of coronary plaques

Plaque analyses were performed on the acquired CCTAs in a core lab setting using a semiautomatic CCTA plaque quantification and characterization software (QAngio® CT Research Edition, Medis, the Netherland, version 3.1.2.4) The plaque analyses were performed by four trained investigators blinded to patient information, and each reader analyzing one-fourth of the assigned images. An expert reader reviewed the analyses for consistency.

With manual adjustments allowed, the software used for plaque quantification and characterization extracted the coronary artery tree, the coronary lumen, and vessel wall contours, thereby enabling both a qualitative and quantitative characterization of vessel morphology, plaque intensities, and overall plaque burden. Scans with low quality due to artifacts, incomplete CCTA processing or insufficient coronary coverage were excluded.

Qualitative plaque assessment

Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) was calculated using the Agaston method. Significant diameter stenosis was defined as a ≥50% luminal diameter stenosis in any vessel segment with at diameter of >2mm at initial visual core lab evaluation.17 Subsequently, qualitative HRP features were evaluated including 1) low-attenuation plaques towards lumen ≤30 Hounsfield units (HU), 2) positive remodeling index of >1.10 (determined by maximum lesion area/healthy reference vessel area), c) napkin ring sign (central low attenuation core, surrounded by a thin semi-circular plaque of lighter attenuation in the outer contour), and d) soft plaque with spotty calcifications encased in soft plaque (≤3mm length calcification).18, 19

A high-risk plaque (HRP) was defined as a plaque with at least two of the above features.20

Quantitative plaque assessment

All vessels with a lumen ≥1.8 mm were analyzed, and coronary volumes were quantified using the "no-gap-method."21 Plaque burden was evaluated on a per patient-level using the following equation for all validated plaque-intensities; total percentage atheroma volume (PAV) = (total plaque volume mm3 / vessel volume mm3) ∗100. A high plaque burden was defined as a total plaque burden above the 75th percentile.

Necrotic core was defined as -30 to 30 HU, fatty fibrous 31 to 130 HU, fibrous 131 to 350 HU, and dense calcium >350 HU. Quantitative plaque analyses were performed only in patients with at least one visual plaque at the qualitative assessment. In patients without any visible plaque, both qualitative and quantitative plaque variables were set to zero.21

Statistics

Data distribution was evaluated using histograms, QQ-plots, and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Quantitative data was presented as mean (± standard derivation (SD)) or median [interquartile range (IQR)] according to normality, and categorical variables as n (%).

For normally distributed continuous variables, Student’s t-test for independent samples was used, whereas the Mann-Whitney U-tests for independent samples were used for non-normally distributed variables. In case of more than two groups, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. Proportions of the dichotomous variables were compared using a χ2 analysis.

Correlations between plaque burden (PAV and CACS) and biomarkers were analyzed using Spearman’s correlation coefficients.

Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed on a per patient-level to assess the relationship between PAV, stenosis, HRP, and the individual risk features, with TnI and CRP as independent variables. Multivariate analyses were adjusted for the components from a validated pre-test likelihood score of obstructive CAD and cardiac events including sex, age, symptom characteristics, smoking-status, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, antihypertensive therapy, and family history.2, 22 Multicollinearity was checked, and missing data were excluded from the logistic regression analysis. Data on biomarkers was categorized according to pre-specified cut-offs defined above. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Data were analyzed using STATA version 17.0.23

RESULTS

Study population

1615 patients with low and intermediate pre-test probability of obstructive CAD, with complete CCTA analyses and biomarker information, were available for statistical analyses (figure 1, figure 2). Baseline characteristics stratified for presence of HRP are summarized in table 1. Patients with HRP were more often men, older, and had more risk factors and typical chest pain compared to patients without HRP (supplemental table 2). The 75th percentile for total plaque burden was 6.95% plaque volume relative to the vessel volume. In total, 376 patients (23.3%) had stenosis, 181 (11%) had HRP, 157 (9.7%) had low attenuation plaque, 340 (21%) had positive remodeling, 39 (2.4%) had napkin ring sign, and 197 (12.2%) had spotty calcifications.

Figure 1:
Figure 1: Study flow.

1From the 1,675 patients enrolled, 1,615 patients had data both CCTA and CRP. 1,604 patients had data on both CCTA and TnI. CCTA = coronary computed tomography angiography.

Figure 2:
Figure 2: Biomarkers for identification of high plaque burden, significant stenosis and high-risk coronary plaques in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

In multivariate analysis, TnI >6ng/L compared to <3ng/L was associated with the presence of stenosis, high-risk plaque, and the individual risk features; low attenuation, positive remodeling and spotty calcification. The presence of stenosis was associated with CRP >2mg/L compared to <1mg/L and on a per-risk feature basis, CRP >2mg/L was only associated with the presence of napkin ring sign.

View this table:
Table 1: Baseline characteristics in patients with and without HRP

High-sensitivity Troponin I

Troponin I was measured in 1,604 patients (99.3%), and median TnI was <3 ng/l. Low, moderate, and high TnI levels were observed in 816 (50.9%), 428 (26.7%), and 360 (22.4%) patients, respectively (supplemental figure 1). Patients with moderate and high TnI levels were more likely to be men and older than patients with low TnI (supplemental table 3).

Association of high-sensitivity Troponin I with plaque burden and stenosis

Troponin I correlated positively but weakly with total plaque burden and plaque burden subtypes; total plaque burden rs=0.14, p<0.001; total non-calcified plaque burden rs=0.14, p<0.001; total necrotic core plaque burden rs=0.13, p <0.001, and CACS rs = 0.15, p <0.001 (supplemental table 4). Moreover, the presence of a high total plaque burden and stenosis were both associated with higher TnI levels (p<0.001 for all comparisons) (figure 3a).

Figure 3:
Figure 3: High total plaque burden and stenosis prevalence with increasing TnI (a) and CRP (b) levels.

High total plaque burden were defined as total plaque burden >75th percentile, Stenosis was defined as ≥ 50% luminal diameter stenosis.

In multivariate analyses, high TnI was independently associated with the presence of stenosis (OR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.03-1.99, p=0.034) but not high total plaque burden (OR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.69-1.28, p=0.690) (table 2).

View this table:
Table 2: Multivariate regression high-sensitivity TnI and high-sensitivity CRP

Association of high-sensitivity Troponin I with high-risk plaques

Overall, the proportion of patients with HRP increased with rising TnI levels; 60/816 (7.4%) of patients with low TnI had HRP, 58/428 (13.5%) of patients with moderate TnI had HRP, and 62/360 (17.2%) of patients with high TnI had HRP (p = <0.001). Similar findings were present for all individual risk feature except for napkin ring sign (figure 4a).

Figure 4:
Figure 4: High-risk plaque and individual risk feature prevalence with increasing TnI (a) and CRP (b) levels.

A high-risk plaque was defined as a plaque with at least two of the individual risk features.

In univariate analyses, patients with moderate and high TnI levels were at higher risk of having a HRP compared to low TnI level patients. Overall odds for having any individual risk feature were higher in moderate and high TnI groups (supplemental table 5). In multivariate analyses, high TnI was associated with having HRP (OR 1.79, 95% CI: 1.17– 2.74, p = 0.008) (table 2). For the individual risk features, high TnI levels were associated with low attenuation plaque, positive remodeling, and spotty calcification, however napkin ring sign was not (table 2).

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein

C-reactive protein was measured in 1,615 patients (100%), and median CRP was 1.2 mg/l. Overall, low, moderate, and high CRP was present in 698/1615 (43.2%), 415/1615 (25.7%), and 502/1615 (31.1%) patients, respectively (supplemental figure 2). Similar to TnI, patients with moderate and high CRP levels were more likely to be men and were older than those with low CRP (supplemental table 6).

Association of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein with plaque burden and stenosis

C-reactive protein correlated positively but weakly with total plaque burden and plaque burden subtypes: total plaque burden (rs =0.08, p<0.001); total non-calcified plaque burden (rs=0.09, p<0.001); total necrotic core plaque burden (rs=0.07, p<0.001); and CACS (rs=0.07, p <0.001) (supplemental table 4). Moreover, the presence of a high total PAV and stenosis were both associated with increasing CRP levels (p<0.05 for all comparisons) (figure 3b).

In multivariate analyses, high CRP levels were associated with stenosis (OR 1.38, 95% CI: 1.03-1.85, p=0.032) but not high total plaque burden (OR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.81-1.40, p=0.644) (table 2).

Association of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein with high-risk plaques

Overall, the proportion of patients having HRPs increased with increasing CRP levels; 66/698 (9.5%) of patients with low CRP having HRP, 49/415 (11.8%) of patients with moderate CRP having HRP, and 66/502 (13.2%) of patients with high CRP having HRP (p=0.044). Similar findings were present of a per HRP-feature basis except for spotty calcification (figure 4b).

In univariate analyses, high CRP levels were associated with HRP (supplemental table 5). However, in multivariate analyses, high CRP levels were not associated with the presence of HRP. For the individual high-risk features, high CRP levels were associated with presence of napkin ring sign alone (table 2).

DISCUSSION

This study is the first of its size to investigate both qualitative and quantitative measures of CAD, assessed as plaque burden and specific plaque features on CCTA, in relation to TnI and CRP. In patients with symptoms suggestive of suspected CAD referred for a primary investigation by CCTA, we found TnI to be associated with the presence of stenosis and HRP, mainly based on an increased prevalence of low attenuation plaques, positive remodeling, and spotty calcification in patients with higher ranges of TnI. Furthermore, we found that CRP was associated with the presence of stenosis and the napkin ring sign feature. Interestingly, high total plaque burden was not linked to TnI and CRP. Our findings indicate that biomarkers of myocardial ischemia and inflammation may be important indicators for identifying patients with stenosis and HRP to improve prognosis.

Association of high-sensitivity Troponin I with plaque burden and diameter stenosis

Overall, we found no association between elevated TnI and high total plaque burden, and previous studies are ambiguous on the association.15, 24–26

In line with our findings, the Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain study (PROMISE) investigators reported an association between elevated levels of TnI and the presence of stenosis. However, their thresholds for high TnI (>1.5 ng/L) were lower compared to our criteria (6 ng/L) which could be due to different detection limits (0.5 ng/L vs. 3.0 ng/L). Similar to our findings, the PROMISE investigators evaluated stenosis as ≥50% diameter stenosis on CCTA which generally overestimates stenosis severity compared to invasive assessment.27 However, studies in high-risk cohorts with invasive coronary angiography report a similar association between elevated levels of TnI and presence of stenosis.28

Association of high-sensitivity Troponin with high-risk plaques and individual risk features

Our findings support the PROMISE trial’s evidence of a positive association between increasing TnI levels and specific HRP features, namely the presence of low attenuation and positive remodeling.12 In addition, we found TnI levels associated with the presence of spotty calcification which the PROMISE investigators did not include in the HRP feature definition. The PROMISE investigators defined presence of HRP as having just one HRP feature on qualitative CCTA assessment which would improve the ability of TnI to discriminate patients with HRP compared to our definition.

Despite the differences outlined, we similarly found no association between TnI and the presence of napkin ring signs, suggesting that especially low attenuation features and positive remodeling seem associated with elevated TnI levels which previously was confirmed by a small study (N=99) using intravascular ultrasound.15

Association of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein with plaque burden and diameter stenosis

Consistent with prior research, other studies reported proportional increasing CRP-levels with increasing diameter stenosis, supporting inflammatory biomarkers as possible predictors of obstructive CAD.29, 30 Notably, we found no association between CRP and high total plaque burden (table 2) which other authors also confirm.12, 24, 26 Yet, others have associated CRP with specifically non-calcified plaque burden.24 Overall, whether a link between inflammatory markers and potentially obstructive CAD is caused by systemic inflammation or low-grade ischemia remains unknown. As anti-inflammatory agents successfully decrease the risk of CAD,11, 31 a theory of inflammatory markers being important elements in CAD genesis is plausible, and CRP cannot be dismissed when considering CAD extent.

Association of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein with high-risk plaques and individual risk features

We found no association in multivariate analyses between high CRP and the presence of HRP. On a single-feature basis, only the presence of napkin ring sign was associated with CRP. These results differ from the association reported by the CAPIRE authors between CRP and the presence of low attenuation and positive remodeling.26 This could partly be explained by differences in populations and improved ability to adjust for confounders based on larger sample size in our multiple regression analysis. Additionally, the CAPIRE investigator did not associate CRP and the presence of the napkin ring sign which can be explained by a reported low feature prevalence and a rather labile definition of low attenuation defined the presence of any voxel <30 HU.26

The PROMISE investigators found no association between IL-6 and the presence of HRP which is similar to CRP in our study.12

Clinical implications

Using CCTA, our findings direct the focus toward plaque characteristics rather than just overall plaque burden, outlining that the presence of stenosis and specifically HRPs may be more important in CAD risk evaluation than the amount of atherosclerosis alone. Our findings suggest that biomarkers can help identify patients with HRP features, which previously was shown to increase risk of future events.3, 32 An ongoing prospective cohort, Troponin in Acute Chest Pain to Risk Stratify and Guide Effective Use of Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (TARGET-CTCA trial; NCT03952351), investigates if patient outcomes are improved by offering CCTA to acute chest pain patients with elevated TnI levels after myocardial infarction is rule out. Likewise, TnI may have a place in pre-test evaluation of patients with stable chest pain by introducing biomarkers to a pre-test clinical likelihood model.

As lipid-lowering medicine has been associated with reduced progression of HRP features33, offering CCTA to patients with elevated TnI levels in stable chest pain patients may play an important role as it is unknown if all patients with elevated TnI or CRP will benefit from preventive therapy or only those with HRP or other adverse CAD features, Still, trials on biomarker-guided diagnostic testing and medical therapy in de novo stable chest pain patients are warranted.

Large clinical trials showed that anti-inflammatory therapy reduced the rate of recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with CRP ≥2mg/L.11 The fact that anti-inflammatory therapy reduces cardiovascular events indicates that CRP levels could guide clinicians to introduce anti-inflammatory therapy as a preventive measure for patients with CAD. However, clinical trials testing anti-inflammatory therapy in de novo chest pain patients are warranted.

Strengths and limitations

The study had limitations. Firstly, categorical data was used as opposed to continuous data and no definite cut-off values for TnI and CRP for identifying stenosis and plaque risk features have been proposed. Our approach validates suggested thresholds from previous studies,11, 15, 16 and the stratification represents a pragmatic use of cut-offs which is helpful in clinical decision-making and structured risk stratification tools. Secondly, a large proportion of patients had undetectable biomarker levels despite highly sensitive assays. A more sensitive analysis could have improved accuracy, but the current approach used commercial assays and clinically relevant cut-offs for real-world relevance. Thirdly, while CRP is the most utilized inflammatory marker in clinical practice, it is also organ-nonspecific; at baseline sampling, reporting on signs of infection might have reduced the risk of competing reasons for elevated CRP. Fourthly, assessment of plaque burden, stenosis, and HRPs is observer-dependent but the applied approach has been validated against intravascular ultrasound and has shown good inter- and intra-observer agreement and reproducibility.17, 34, 35 Additionally, a blinded expert-reader reviewed all lesions with any risk feature to ensure consistency with the pre-defined criteria. Fifthly, we did not have the opportunity to investigate long term outcomes which could have demonstrated the stipulated risk of cardiovascular events for patients with HRPs and whether elevations in biomarkers independent of plaque risk features can predict cardiovascular events. Finally, our population consisted of symptomatic patients referred to non-invasive CCTA and results are only applicable in patients with low and medium risk of CAD and not the general asymptomatic population or in patients with very high-risk.

CONCLUSION

In de novo chest pain patients, TnI is associated with the presence of stenosis, high-risk plaque, and the individual risk features low attenuation, positive remodeling, and spotty calcification. The presence of stenosis was associated with CRP, and on a per-risk feature basis CRP was only associated with the presence of the napkin ring sign.

Data Availability

The data that support the results of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

FUNDING

This study was financed by the Novo Nordisk Foundation Clinical Emerging Investigator grant (NNF21OC0066981) and the Independent Research Fund Denmark (1149-00015B).

DISCLOSURES

Nothing to disclose.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Figures S1-S2.

Tables S1–S6.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors acknowledge all the trial site staff, the investigators, and patients who participated in the trial.

Abbreviations

CAD
Coronary artery disease
CCTA
Coronary computed tomography angiography HRP High-risk plaque
TnI
Troponin I
CRP
C-reactive protein
FFR
Fractional flow reserve
CACS
Coronary artery calcium score
HU
Hounsfield units
PAV
Percentage atheroma volume

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Knuuti J, Revenco V. 2019 esc guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. European heart journal. 2020;41:407–477
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    Winther S, Schmidt SE, Foldyna B, Mayrhofer T, Rasmussen LD, Dahl JN, et al. Coronary calcium scoring improves risk prediction in patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80:1965–1977
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    Williams MC, Moss AJ, Dweck M, Adamson PD, Alam S, Hunter A, et al. Coronary artery plaque characteristics associated with adverse outcomes in the scot-heart study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:291–301
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Senoner T, Plank F, Barbieri F, Beyer C, Birkl K, Widmann G, et al. Added value of high-risk plaque criteria by coronary cta for prediction of long-term outcomes. Atherosclerosis. 2020;300:26–33
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Williams MC, Kwiecinski J, Doris M, McElhinney P, D’Souza MS, Cadet S, et al. Low-attenuation noncalcified plaque on coronary computed tomography angiography predicts myocardial infarction: Results from the multicenter scot-heart trial (scottish computed tomography of the heart). Circulation. 2020;141:1452–1462
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Thomsen C, Abdulla J. Characteristics of high-risk coronary plaques identified by computed tomographic angiography and associated prognosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging. 2015;17:120–129
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    Samman Tahhan A, Sandesara P, Hayek SS, Hammadah M, Alkhoder A, Kelli HM, et al. High-sensitivity troponin i levels and coronary artery disease severity, progression, and long-term outcomes. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2018;7:e007914
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Shah PK. Biomarkers of plaque instability. Current Cardiology Reports. 2014;16:547
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Antonopoulos AS, Angelopoulos A, Papanikolaou P, Simantiris S, Oikonomou EK, Vamvakaris K, et al. Biomarkers of vascular inflammation for cardiovascular risk prognostication: A meta-analysis. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2022;15:460–471
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    Marston NA, Bonaca MP, Jarolim P, Goodrich EL, Bhatt DL, Steg PG, et al. Clinical application of high-sensitivity troponin testing in the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease framework of the current cholesterol guidelines. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:1255–1262
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    Ridker PM, Everett BM, Thuren T, MacFadyen JG, Chang WH, Ballantyne C, et al. Antiinflammatory therapy with canakinumab for atherosclerotic disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;377:1119–1131
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Ferencik M, Mayrhofer T, Lu MT, Bittner DO, Emami H, Puchner SB, et al. Coronary atherosclerosis, cardiac troponin, and interleukin-6 in patients with chest pain: The promise trial results. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2022
  13. 13.↵
    Nissen L, Winther S, Westra J, Ejlersen JA, Isaksen C, Rossi A, et al. Diagnosing coronary artery disease after a positive coronary computed tomography angiography: The dan-nicad open label, parallel, head to head, randomized controlled diagnostic accuracy trial of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19:369–377
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    Nissen L, Winther S, Isaksen C, Ejlersen JA, Brix L, Urbonaviciene G, et al. Danish study of non-invasive testing in coronary artery disease (dan-nicad): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:1–11
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Brown AJ, Shah AS, West NE, Costopoulos C, Orzalkiewicz M, Newby DE, et al. High-sensitivity troponin i is associated with high-risk plaque and mace in stable coronary artery disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2017;10:1200–1203
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    Rubin J, Chang HJ, Nasir K, Blumenthal RS, Blaha MJ, Choi EK, et al. Association between high-sensitivity c-reactive protein and coronary plaque subtypes assessed by 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography in an asymptomatic population. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:201–209
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Heinsen LJ, Pararajasingam G, Andersen TR, Auscher S, Sheta HM, Precht H, et al. High-risk coronary artery plaque in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes: Clinical risk factors and coronary artery calcium score. Cardiovascular Diabetology. 2021;20:164
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    Boogers MJ, Broersen A, Van Velzen JE, De Graaf FR, El-Naggar HM, Kitslaar PH, et al. Automated quantification of coronary plaque with computed tomography: Comparison with intravascular ultrasound using a dedicated registration algorithm for fusion-based quantification. European heart journal. 2012;33:1007–1016
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Gaur S, Øvrehus KA, Dey D, Leipsic J, Bøtker HE, Jensen JM, et al. Coronary plaque quantification and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomography angiography identify ischaemia-causing lesions. European heart journal. 2016;37:1220–1227
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Cury RC, Abbara S, Achenbach S, Agatston A, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, et al. Cad-rads(tm) coronary artery disease - reporting and data system. An expert consensus document of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography (scct), the american college of radiology (acr) and the north american society for cardiovascular imaging (nasci). Endorsed by the american college of cardiology. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10:269–281
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Bax AM, Yoon YE, Gianni U, van Rosendael AR, Lu Y, Ma X, et al. Vessel-specific plaque features on coronary computed tomography angiography among patients of varying atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging. 2022;23:1171–1179
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    Winther S, Schmidt SE, Rasmussen LD, Juárez Orozco LE, Steffensen FH, Bøtker HE, et al. Validation of the european society of cardiology pre-test probability model for obstructive coronary artery disease. European Heart Journal. 2020;42:1401–1411
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    Patel SM, Qamar A, Giugliano RP, Jarolim P, Marston NA, Park J-G, et al. Association of serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin t with subsequent cardiovascular events in patients stabilized after acute coronary syndrome: A secondary analysis from improve-it. JAMA cardiology. 2022
  24. 24.↵
    Karpouzas GA, Estis J, Rezaeian P, Todd J, Budoff MJ. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin i is a biomarker for occult coronary plaque burden and cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57:1080–1088
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.
    Januzzi Jr JL, Suchindran S, Coles A, Ferencik M, Patel MR, Hoffmann U, et al. High-sensitivity troponin i and coronary computed tomography in symptomatic outpatients with suspected cad: Insights from the promise trial. Cardiovascular Imaging. 2019;12:1047–1055
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    Conte E, Andreini D, Magnoni M, Masson S, Mushtaq S, Berti S, et al. Association of high-risk coronary atherosclerosis at ccta with clinical and circulating biomarkers: Insight from capire study. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. 2021;15:73–80
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    Butler J, Shapiro M, Reiber J, Sheth T, Ferencik M, Kurtz EG, et al. Extent and distribution of coronary artery disease: A comparative study of invasive versus noninvasive angiography with computed angiography. Am Heart J. 2007;153:378–384
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Zhang Q, Wang Y-F, Hu X, Tan Y-J, Gao C, Chen J, et al. Association of serum cardiac troponin i and severity of coronary stenosis in patients with varied renal functions: A retrospective cohort study. BMJ open. 2022;12:e054722
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    Liu H-H, Zhao D, Ma C-S, Liu X-H, Lv Q, Qi Y, et al. C-reactive protein predicts the severity of coronary artery disease beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Angiology. 2012;63:218–222
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Yang DH, Kang J-W, Kim H-K, Choe J, Baek S, Kim SH, et al. Association between c-reactive protein and type of coronary arterial plaque in asymptomatic patients: Assessment with coronary ct angiography. Radiology. 2014;272:665–673
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    Niu Y, Bai N, Ma Y, Zhong P-Y, Shang Y-S, Wang Z-L. Safety and efficacy of anti-inflammatory therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2022;22:84
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    Motoyama S, Ito H, Sarai M, Kondo T, Kawai H, Nagahara Y, et al. Plaque characterization by coronary computed tomography angiography and the likelihood of acute coronary events in mid-term follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:337–346
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    Piña P, Lorenzatti D, Paula R, Daich J, Schenone AL, Gongora C, et al. Imaging subclinical coronary atherosclerosis to guide lipid management, are we there yet? American Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2023;13:100451
    OpenUrl
  34. 34.↵
    Lee S-E, Park H-B, Xuan D, Lee BK, Hong M-K, Jang Y, et al. Consistency of quantitative analysis of coronary computed tomography angiography. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. 2019;13:48–54
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    De Graaf MA, Broersen A, Kitslaar PH, Roos CJ, Dijkstra J, Lelieveldt BP, et al. Automatic quantification and characterization of coronary atherosclerosis with computed tomography coronary angiography: Cross-correlation with intravascular ultrasound virtual histology. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging. 2013;29:1177–1190
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Posted September 16, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Biomarkers for Identification of High-Risk Coronary Artery Plaques in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
Gitte Pedersen, Jonathan Nørtoft Dahl, Laust Dupont Rasmussen, Anne-Birgitte Garm Blavnsfeldt, Sidsel Hauge Böttcher, Matias Hauge Böttcher, Mette Nyegaard, Louise Nissen, Simon Winther
medRxiv 2023.09.14.23295593; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.14.23295593
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area