Abstract
Introduction Education is recognized as an effective and necessary method in chronic low back pain. Nevertheless, the data on the effectiveness of education in physical activity in the medium or long term are not yet well known, nor the factors that could lead to practice such or such education. Our study aims to measure the effectiveness of a pain neuroscience education compared to a back school on physical activity three months and one year after educational sessions coupled with a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. The study also seeks to measure the effects of these two types of education on several other factors including the intensity of pain and psycho-behavioral factors. Finally, it aims to identify the determinants of the success of the educational sessions coupled with the rehabilitation program.
Methods and analysis The study will involve eighty-two adults with chronic low back pain. The study will be monocentric, prospective, open, controlled, and randomized, of superiority, with two parallel arms with an experimental group “pain neuroscience education” and a control group “back school”. The primary outcome will be the average number of steps taken at home over a week measured by an actigraph. Secondary outcomes include behavioral assessments. Descriptive and inferential analysis will be carried out on the primary and secondary judgment criteria. Multivariate modeling will be carried out using actimetric data and data from the main and secondary outcomes.
Ethics and dissemination a favorable opinion was given by the Committee for Personal Protection of Ile de France VII on June 22, 2023 (National number: 2023-A00346-39). The study was previously registered with the National Agency or the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (IDRCB : 2023-A00346-39). This protocol is the version submitted to the Committee for Personal Protection of Ile de France VII entitled “Protocol Version N°1 of 03/29/2023”.
Trial Registration NCT05840302.
Article Summary Strengths and limitations of this study
The use of an actigraph as a measuring tool of physical activity in ecological context to evaluate effectiveness of an education in low back pain.
The follow-up at three months and one year after the rehabilitation program.
The study includes an analysis of actimetric data, behavioral, occupational and psychological variables to determine the predictive factors for the success of educational sessions.
The monocentric design of this study is a limitation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT05840302
Funding Statement
This study is supported by the Ministry of Solidarity and Health as part of a hospital nursing and paramedical research program (grant number: PHRIP-20-0259) and by the National Council of the Order of Physiotherapists (CNOMK) (grant number: 2022-03).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Ile de France VII Personal Protection Committee gave its agreement on June 22, 2023 for this work (National number: 2023-A00346-39) The National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products approved this work (CRDI: 2023-A00346-39)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Email addresses: guillaume.thebault{at}hopital-lamalou.fr, c-duflos{at}chu-montpellier.fr, gael.leperf{at}hopital-lamalou.fr
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
