Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Evaluating community knowledge, attitude, and practices toward implementation of telemedicine in Saudi Arabia

View ORCID ProfileMustafa Mohammed Mustafa, Mohammed Al-Mohaithef
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.27.23296248
Mustafa Mohammed Mustafa
1Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mustafa Mohammed Mustafa
  • For correspondence: mm.mohammed{at}seu.edu.sa
Mohammed Al-Mohaithef
1Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The urgent need to provide fast, low-cost, affordable, and high-quality medical services is one of the requirements of today’s modern world, which is characterized by a fast pace and search for the best services, especially regarding medical consultation and treatment. These demands have led to the invention of new ways that medical services can be provided to patients in their homes.

Methods A cross-sectional study, conducted in February 2022 and ended in June 2023 with a representative sample of different categories of citizens. The study population included 281 (81.9%) males and 62 (18.1%) females (SD.385, mean 1.18). The study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Saudi citizens in the Riyadh region regarding telemedicine.

Results The study revealed that only 30.3% of respondents were able to select the correct definition of the term telemedicine from three alternatives, which may reflect poor knowledge about telemedicine. A total of 19.5% of our participants said that they used telemedicine services only for medical consultations, while 13.7 said they used it for diagnosis and treatment. A total of 104 (88.9) out of 117 of the respondents believed that telemedicine has a positive impact on reducing costs and saving time.

Conclusion The study concluded that the main barriers that limit the use of telemedicine services are a lack of confidence in accessing telemedicine, difficulty in communicating due to the use of different languages and dialects, and the fact that services are not suitable for uneducated people.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee of Saudi Electronic University. (SEUREC-220019-, 17.2.2022).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 28, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluating community knowledge, attitude, and practices toward implementation of telemedicine in Saudi Arabia
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Evaluating community knowledge, attitude, and practices toward implementation of telemedicine in Saudi Arabia
Mustafa Mohammed Mustafa, Mohammed Al-Mohaithef
medRxiv 2023.09.27.23296248; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.27.23296248
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Evaluating community knowledge, attitude, and practices toward implementation of telemedicine in Saudi Arabia
Mustafa Mohammed Mustafa, Mohammed Al-Mohaithef
medRxiv 2023.09.27.23296248; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.27.23296248

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Primary Care Research
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)