Abstract
Analysing cough sounds is vital in pulmonary medicine. Recently, AI tools are being trained to analyse the acoustic signals of cough sounds so that more cases can be quickly tested, thereby reducing the patient load on primary healthcare systems. In this paper, we evaluate ”Swaasa”, our AI-based platform for rapid respiratory screening, highlighting its efficacy and ease of use. We applied our trained classifier to catch underlying pathologies from cough sound data collected from diverse sources. We then used a pattern classifier to identify specific respiratory conditions based on cough sound patterns. We tested the robustness of our methods by comparing our results with that of a pulmonary physician in 355 cases and show that Swaasa correctly predicted associated risk in 87.32% of those cases. Our platform has a sensitivity of 97.27% with a Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 88.54%, giving us the potential to revolutionise disease screening, especially for large populations and in isolated rural areas. Our rapid and easy-to-use Software as a Service (SaaS) solution efficiently diagnoses and conserves resources, improves patient outcomes, and establishes a comprehensive and accessible healthcare framework.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study is supported by the MietY (Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology), India. We would also like to acknowledge the team from Andhra Medical College Visakhapatnam for all the support provided.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The data was collected at multiple sites, including Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, India. The studies were registered under Clinical Trials Registry- India (CTRI/2021/07/035096), (CTRI/2021/09/036489) and (CTRI/2021/09/036609) were begun after getting the approval from the AMC- Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
