Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Research Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Outcome of the 3D-Printed Patient-Specific-Instrument Assisted Lapidus Fusion vs Conventional Lapidus Fusion for Surgical Correction of Hallux Valgus Deformity

View ORCID ProfileSamuel Ka-Kin Ling, Rachel Xiaoyu Wei, Elvis Chun-Sing Chui, Boon Hor Chong, Michael Tim-Yun Ong, Pauline Po-Yee Lui, Patrick Shu-Hang Yung
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.05.23296589
Samuel Ka-Kin Ling
1Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong SAR, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Samuel Ka-Kin Ling
  • For correspondence: samuel.ling{at}link.cuhk.edu.hk
Rachel Xiaoyu Wei
1Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong SAR, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elvis Chun-Sing Chui
1Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong SAR, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boon Hor Chong
1Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong SAR, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Tim-Yun Ong
1Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong SAR, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pauline Po-Yee Lui
1Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong SAR, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Shu-Hang Yung
1Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong SAR, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Hallux valgus (HV) affects up to 30% of the population. Lapidus surgery with 1st tarsal-metatarsal joint arthrodesis is one of the most common surgical options for HV. Despite its popularity, the current procedure is not without complications. This investigation will be the world’s first Lapidus arthrodesis surgery utilising patient-specific instruments (PSI) as an assistive tool. We hypothesise that the PSI will enhance surgical precision, accelerate fusion rates, decrease non-unions, and reduce the need to use bone grafts.

Methods and analysis This is a single-blinded, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial comparing the outcome of the 3D-Printed PSI Assisted Lapidus Fusion (n=27) vs Conventional Lapidus Fusion (n=27) for HV deformity. Both groups will receive an identical postoperative rehabilitation of protected weight bearing and splinting. Outcomes will include foot function scores, radiological alignment and arthrodesis site assessment with X-ray and High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative-Computed Tomography, and foot pressure analysis.

Strengths

  • This will be the world’s first randomised control trial utilising PSI for hallux valgus surgery.

  • Surgeries are done by a team of experienced foot and ankle surgeons.

Limitations

  • A single-centre study with a follow-up of only 1 year. However, the authors believe that traditional Lapidus surgery has known term results, and the chief hypothetical benefit of PSI-assisted surgery is faster bony fusion and less surgical complications, which will be evident within 1 year.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05602844

Funding Statement

Yes

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Not Applicable

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Joint CUHK-NTEC CREC Ref 2020.633-T has granted ethics approval for this proposed study.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Not Applicable

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Not Applicable

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Not Applicable

Footnotes

  • Ethics: The study will comply with the Declaration of Helsinki and ICH-GCP. The Joint CUHK-NTEC CREC Ref 2020.633-T has granted ethics approval for this proposed study.

  • Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT05602844

  • Protocol Version: 28 Oct 2022 version 01

  • Principal Investigator: Samuel KK Ling, CUHK

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 05, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Research Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Outcome of the 3D-Printed Patient-Specific-Instrument Assisted Lapidus Fusion vs Conventional Lapidus Fusion for Surgical Correction of Hallux Valgus Deformity
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Outcome of the 3D-Printed Patient-Specific-Instrument Assisted Lapidus Fusion vs Conventional Lapidus Fusion for Surgical Correction of Hallux Valgus Deformity
Samuel Ka-Kin Ling, Rachel Xiaoyu Wei, Elvis Chun-Sing Chui, Boon Hor Chong, Michael Tim-Yun Ong, Pauline Po-Yee Lui, Patrick Shu-Hang Yung
medRxiv 2023.10.05.23296589; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.05.23296589
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Outcome of the 3D-Printed Patient-Specific-Instrument Assisted Lapidus Fusion vs Conventional Lapidus Fusion for Surgical Correction of Hallux Valgus Deformity
Samuel Ka-Kin Ling, Rachel Xiaoyu Wei, Elvis Chun-Sing Chui, Boon Hor Chong, Michael Tim-Yun Ong, Pauline Po-Yee Lui, Patrick Shu-Hang Yung
medRxiv 2023.10.05.23296589; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.05.23296589

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Orthopedics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)