ABSTRACT
Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a devastating type of stroke, leading to high mortality and morbidity rates. Cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) are common complications following SAH and contribute significantly to the poor outcomes observed in these patients. Intrathecal (IT) nicardipine delivered via an existing external ventricular drain has been shown to be correlated with reduced DCI and improved patient outcomes. The current study aims to characterize population pharmacokinetic (popPK) properties of intermittent IT nicardipine. Following informed consent, serial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were obtained from 16 SAH patients (50.4 ± 9.3 years old; 12 females) treated with IT nicardipine every 6 hours (n=8) or every 8 hours (n=8), which were subject to high-performance liquid chromatography for measurement of its CSF concentration. Our popPK analysis showed that the CSF PK of IT nicardipine in the cohort was adequately described by a two-compartment model with a lag time, with reliable parameter estimates (relative standard error < 50%). The intracranial pressure influenced both the total clearance and the central volume. Calculated PK parameters were similar between q6h and q8h dosing regimens. Despite a small cohort of SAH patients, we successfully developed a popPK model to describe the nicardipine disposition kinetics in the CSF following IT administration. These findings may help inform future clinical trials designed to examine the optimal dosing of IT nicardipine.
Competing Interest Statement
This study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01NS13003601 (OS). It was also supported in part by the Emory HPLC Bioanalytical Core (EHBC), which was supported by the Department of Pharmacology, Emory University School of Medicine and the Georgia Clinical & Translational Science Alliance of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UL1TR002378. Drs. Jeong and Jusko were supported by NIH grant R35 GM131800. EVDs for the in-vitro experiment were contributed by the manufacturer (Codman). The supplier did not intervene in study design, analysis or writing of the manuscript.
Funding Statement
This study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01NS13003601 (OS). It was also supported in part by the Emory HPLC Bioanalytical Core (EHBC), which was supported by the Department of Pharmacology, Emory University School of Medicine and the Georgia Clinical & Translational Science Alliance of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UL1TR002378. Drs. Jeong and Jusko were supported by NIH grant R35 GM131800. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the official views of the National Institutes of Health. EVDs for the in-vitro experiment were contributed by the manufacturer (Codman). The supplier did not intervene in study design, analysis or writing of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Emory University institutional review board (IRB00107474)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
