Abstract
The ‘agentic demand’ of population health interventions may influence intervention effectiveness and equity, yet the absence of an adequate framework to classify agentic demands limits the fields’ advancement. We systematically developed the DEmands for PopulaTion Health Interventions (DePtH) framework identifying three constructs influencing agentic demand - exposure (initial contact with intervention), mechanism of action (how the intervention enables or discourages behaviour), and engagement (recipient response), combined into twenty classifications. We conducted expert qualitative feedback and reliability testing, revised the framework and applied it in a proof-of-concept review, combining it with data on overall effectiveness and equity of dietary and physical activity interventions. Intervention components were concentrated in a small number of classifications; DePtH classification appeared to be related to intervention equity but not effectiveness. This framework holds potential for future research, policy and practice, facilitating the design, selection, evaluation and synthesis of evidence.
Competing Interest Statement
RAM worked part-time as a clinical investigator for Medhealth Research and Analytics ltd, a research and development company between Oct 2020-Feb 2023. Responsibilities included assisting in the research and writing up of clinical trial proposals on various medical conditions, including Alzheimer's disease, lower back pain, depression during menopause, and brain-computer interface (BCI) for stroke rehabilitation. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Clinical Protocols
Funding Statement
This work was funded by the Public Health Policy Research Unit (PH-PRU) (Project 05 G109750). The PH-PRU is commissioned and funded by the National Institute for Health and Social Care Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme. The views expressed in this study are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health and Social Care Research, the Department of Health and Social Care or its arms length bodies, and other Government Departments. KG, DO, JP, CPJ, CF, EL, EI, RP, DVT, RAM, MW and JA are supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC; Unit Programme number MC_UU_12015/6 & MC_UU_00006/7). The funders had no role in study design; collection, analysis and interpretation of data; writing the report; and the decision to submit the report for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics Committee of University of Cambridge School of Humanities and Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee gave ethical approval for this work [21.284]
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
