Abstract
Purpose This study was conducted to assess the level of patient satisfaction with the eye care services received from different tertiary eye hospitals, running under Nepal Nepal Netra Jyoti (NNJS) Sangh, of Madhesh Province, Nepal over a 3-month period (October-December) 2017.
Methods A Cross-sectional based study with client exit interviews were done, using pretested Likert scale tool in sample of 1190 (P=0.5, and 95% CI) consenting patients after receiving the ophthalmic care enrolled in the mentioned tertiary eye hospitals of Madhesh Province. Data on Behavior of the service provider, Services and facilities provided by the hospital was analyzed with the level of patient’s satisfaction. A Pearson’s chi-square test was used to examine the relationship between overall satisfaction and the dependent variables.
Results Only 3.8 % of patients reported visiting the hospital more than four times. The main reasons for choosing their respective hospital was the ‘quality of services’ delivered through modern equipment at affordable costs (53 %) followed by easy access to hospital (39%). The average waiting time was 58 min, with a range of 5-240 min. Level of education (P<0.05), Socioeconomic status (P<0.05), Waiting time (P<0.05), Hospital operating hours (P<0.05), Cleanliness (P<0.05) and Cost of Service (P<0.05) were significantly associated with the overall satisfaction with the services. Behavior of the service providers did not play a statistically significant role in overall satisfaction.
Conclusion Patient satisfaction is a highly desirable outcome of clinical care and may even be an element of health status itself. Our data showed that a significant proportion (95%) of patients were satisfied, or highly satisfied overall (across all parametric measures), and that personal experience, beliefs and background may play a confounding factor in satisfaction. As a result, it can be safely concluded that perceived quality and performance in the hospitals are exceptional.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Grant reference Number: 1564 Dr. Sailesh Kumar Mishra Nepal Health Research Council https://nhrc.gov.np/
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical Review Board of NHRC
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
The dataset will be available through corresponding author.
