Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Distinct longitudinal brain white matter microstructure changes and associated polygenic risk of common psychiatric disorders and Alzheimer’s disease in the UK Biobank

View ORCID ProfileMax Korbmacher, View ORCID ProfileDennis van der Meer, View ORCID ProfileDani Beck, Daniel E. Askeland-Gjerde, View ORCID ProfileEli Eikefjord, View ORCID ProfileArvid Lundervold, View ORCID ProfileOle A. Andreassen, View ORCID ProfileLars T. Westlye, View ORCID ProfileIvan I. Maximov
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.19.23297257
Max Korbmacher
1Department of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
2NORMENT Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
3Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre (MMIV), Bergen, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Max Korbmacher
  • For correspondence: max.korbmacher{at}hvl.no ivan.maximov{at}hvl.no
Dennis van der Meer
2NORMENT Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
4Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dennis van der Meer
Dani Beck
2NORMENT Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
5Department of Psychiatric Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
6Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dani Beck
Daniel E. Askeland-Gjerde
2NORMENT Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eli Eikefjord
1Department of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
3Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre (MMIV), Bergen, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Eli Eikefjord
Arvid Lundervold
1Department of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
3Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre (MMIV), Bergen, Norway
7Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
8Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Arvid Lundervold
Ole A. Andreassen
2NORMENT Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
9KG Jebsen Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ole A. Andreassen
Lars T. Westlye
2NORMENT Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
6Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
9KG Jebsen Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lars T. Westlye
Ivan I. Maximov
1Department of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
2NORMENT Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ivan I. Maximov
  • For correspondence: max.korbmacher{at}hvl.no ivan.maximov{at}hvl.no
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

During the course of adulthood and ageing, white matter (WM) structure and organisation are characterised by slow degradation processes such as demyelination and shrinkage. An acceleration of such ageing process has been linked to the development of a range of diseases. Thus, an accurate description of healthy brain maturation, in particular, in terms of WM features, provides a cornerstone in the understanding of ageing. We use longitudinal diffusion magnetic resonance imaging to provide an overview of WM changes at different spatial and temporal scales in the UK Biobank (UKB) (N=2,678; agescan1=62.38±7.23 years; agescan2=64.81±7.1 years). To examine the genetic overlap between WM structure and common clinical conditions, we tested the associations between WM structure and polygenic risk scores (PGRS) for the most common neurodegenerative disorder, Alzheimer’s disease, and common psychiatric disorders (uniand bipolar depression, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, autism, schizophrenia, attention-deficit-hyperactivity) in longitudinal (N=2,329) and crosssectional UKB validation data (N=31,056). Global and regional single and multi-compartment fractional anisotropy, intra-axonal water fraction, and kurtosis metrics decreased Embedded Image, whereas diffusivity metrics, and free water increased with age Embedded Image, with the annual rate of WM change (ARoC) accelerating at higher ages for both global Embedded Image and regional WM metrics Embedded Image. Voxel-level trends indicated decreasing anisotropy, and variable spatial patterns for other diffusion metrics, suggesting differential changes in frontal compared to other brain regions. Although effect sizes were small Embedded Image, ARoC in middle cerebral peduncle WM had the strongest association with PGRS, especially for Alzheimer’s: Embedded Image. PGRS were more strongly related to ARoC than cross-sectional measures (dscan1=0.03, dscan2=0.03, dvalidation=0.03). Our findings indicate spatially distributed WM changes across the brain, as well as distributed associations of PGRS with WM. Importantly, brain longitudinal changes reflected the genetic risk for disorder development better than the utilised cross-sectional measures, with regional differences giving more specific insights into gene-brain change associations than global averages.

Introduction

White matter microstructure (WMM) changes significantly throughout the lifespan. Recent large-scale studies suggest a strong association between WMM and age during both healthy and diseased ageing (1–7). Previous findings demonstrated general trends of tissue anisotropy increases and water diffusivity decreases throughout childhood (8–10), and, as reversal dynamics of these trends, throughout adulthood (3, 11). Importantly, abnormal white matter (WM) development has been associated with the development of neurocognitive skills and mental health symptoms in childhood and adolescence (12) and brain disorders later in life (13, 14). A person’s genetically determined propensity to develop a certain disorder can also be summarised by polygenic risk scores (PGRS) (15–23). Combining brain imaging and genetics opens the opportunity to associate the elevated genetic risk for disorders with specific brain features (24) in terms of scalar imaging metrics (25, 26). This allows to identify which brain regions might be more prone to disease developments based on the genetic makeup, and provide additional biological detail to the observed WM changes. An advantage of using WMM for such associations is the level of detail provided by biophysical models, such as intraand extra axonal diffusion processes (27–31). WM-specific changes are associated with various common psychiatric disorders (13, 14), and precede, for example, the symptom onset in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) (32). This outlines WMM as an important aspect for further investigation in disease formation and outcomes.

As the temporal aspect matters when investigating tissue changes, longitudinal designs are required (6). Hence, longitudinal changes in WM are informative when examining PGRS-tissue associations as they allow to connect PGRS with actual WM change and not only cross-sectional “snapshots” of brain structure at a given moment of an individual’s life.

In order to estimate ageing effects on WM alterations, studies commonly focus on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) (33). While DTI is useful for mesostructural characterisations, DTI is also limited in addressing certain common phenomena in WM such as crossing fibre bundles, non-Gaussian diffusion, and differences between intra- and extra-axonal water compartments (34). Recent achievements in advanced diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) techniques offer a spectrum of biophysical models (27–31) addressing these issues, for example, by differentiating between intra and extra-axonal space (27, 29, 31), or by capturing non-Gaussian diffusion (27, 28). In turn, there are few longitudinal studies observing WMM changes (10, 35, 36), and even fewer also utilising advanced diffusion approaches beyond DTI (6, 10). In order to fill this gap, we assess the metrics of a series of dMRI approaches in a large longitudinal mid-to-late life adult sample provided by the UKB (37) and identify the spatio-temporal patterns of ageing-related WMM changes on a global, regional, and voxel-level scale. To further investigate potential genetic underpinnings of these WMM changes, we estimate PGRS informed by previous genome-wide association studies for AD, the most common neurodegenerative disorder, and common psychiatric disorders, including Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Bipolar Disorder (BIP), Anxiety Disorder (ANX), Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Schizophrenia (SCZ), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). PGRS capture an individual’s genetic propensity for a trait by aggregating the estimated effects of risk variants across the entire genome. Together with brain structure and brain structural changes, PGRS may be informative for the development of disease. For example, these gene-brain associations can help identify concrete spatial patterns for different diseases (38, 39). For further inference on the generalisability of the associations between PGRS and WM in the longitudinal sample with available PGRS (after exclusions: N = 2,329), we estimated the same associations for independent participants from the cross-sectional portion of the UKB (after exclusions: N = 31,056) (37). Based on previous findings (3, 40), we expected near-linear age associations of diffusion metrics, generally outlining lower fractional anisotropy, intra-axonal water fraction, and kurtosis at higher ages, but higher diffusivity, extra-axonal free water fraction. More-over, we expected to observe PGRS-WMM associations for AD globally and in most age-sensitive regions.

Methods

A. Sample characteristics

We obtained UKB data (37), including the longitudinal dMRI data of N = 4,871 participants at two time points. Participant data were excluded when consent had been withdrawn, and when dMRI data were not meeting quality control (QC) standards using the YTTRIUM method (41) (see also Supplement 1). Additionally, we excluded participants which were diagnosed with any mental and behavioural disorder (ICD-10 category F), disease of the nervous system (ICD-10 category G), and disease of the circulatory system (ICD-10 category I). Remaining data sets after exclusions were applied were N = 2,678 participants (52.99% females). At baseline, participants were on average 62.26±7.19 years old (range: 46.12-80.30 years) and at time point two, mean age was 64.70±7.07 years (range: 49.33-82.59 years), indicating an average age difference as Δage =2.44±0.73 years (range: 1.12-6.90 years). The data were collected at three sites: (1) in Cheadle (57.36%), (2) Newcastle (37.04%), and (3) Reading (5.60%). PGRS data were available for N = 2,329 of these longitudinal data sets and for N = 31,056 cross-sectional validation data sets (after exclusions).

B. MRI acquisition and post-processing

UKB MRI data acquisition procedures are described elsewhere (37, 42, 43).

After obtaining access to the raw dMRI data, we preprocessed it using an optimised pipeline (41). The pipeline includes corrections for noise (44), Gibbs ringing (45), susceptibility-induced and motion distortions, and eddy currents artefacts (46). Isotropic 1 mm3 Gaussian smoothing was carried out using FSL’s (47, 48) fslmaths. Employing the multi-shell data, Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging (DKI) (28) and White Matter Tract Integrity (WMTI) (27) metrics were estimated using Matlab 2017b code (https://github.com/NYU-DiffusionMRI/DESIGNER). Spherical mean technique SMT (30), and multi-compartment spherical mean technique (mcSMT) (29) metrics were estimated using original code (https://github.com/ekaden/smt) (29, 30). Estimates from the Bayesian Rotational Invariant Approach (BRIA) were evaluated by the original Matlab code (https://bitbucket.org/reisert/baydiff/src/master/) (31).

In total, we obtained 26 WM metrics from six diffusion approaches (DTI, DKI, WMTI, SMT, mcSMT, BRIA; see for overview in Supplement 2). In order to normalise all metrics, we used Tract-based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) (49), as part of FSL (47, 48). In brief, initially all brain-extracted (50) fractional anisotropy (FA) images were aligned to MNI space using non-linear transformation (FNIRT) (48). Following, the mean FA image and related mean FA skeleton were derived. Each diffusion scalar map was projected onto the mean FA skeleton using TBSS. To provide a quantitative description of diffusion metrics at a region level, we used the John Hopkins University (JHU) atlas (51), and obtained 30 hemisphere-specific white matter (WM) regions of interest (ROIs) based on a probabilistic WM atlas (JHU) (52) for each of the 26 metrics. Altogether, 1,794 diffusion features were derived per individual [26 metrics × (48 ROIs + 20 tracts + 1 global mean value)].

C. Polygenic Risk Scores

We estimated PGRS for each participant with available genomic data, using PRSice2 (53) with default settings. As input for the PGRS, we used summary statistics from recent genome-wide association studies of ASD (15), MDD (19), SCZ (22), ADHD (16), BIP (21), OCD (17), ANX (18), and AD (20). We used a minor allele frequency of 0.05, as most commonly used threshold across PRS studies of psychiatric disorders.

While psychiatric disorders were p-values thresholded at α = 0.05 (15–23), recommendations for AD (α = 1.07−4 (54)) lead to the application of a lower threshold of α = 0.0001, with the goal of optimising signal to noise in comparison to previously used α = 0.001 (55). The goal with the estimation of the PGRS was to relate cross-sectional WMM metrics and WMM changes to disease-related genetic profiles to examine to which degree these genetic risk profiles can explain WMM changes in midlife to senescence.

Statistical Analyses

All statistical analyses were carried out using R version 4.2.0 (www.r-project.org), and FSL version 6.0.1 (48).

First, we assessed unadjusted time point differences by using paired samples t-tests on a set of cognitive measures, and each of the global and regional scalar diffusion metrics F (such as FA from DTI) and present Cohen’s d indicating the effect size: Embedded Image describing the difference between means Embedded Image over an estimate of the sample standard deviation of the data Embedded Image.

We then used linear mixed effects regression models (LMER) adjusting F for age, sex, the sex-age interaction (sex × age), time point (TP) and scanner site (Site). ID was treated as random intercept (RRI), and y the y-intercept: Embedded Image For comparison of age-relationships between time points, we utilised simple linear and generalised additive models (GAMs) on each single time point (treating the data as crosssectional), with the linear models taking the following form: Embedded Image and the GAMs this form (including a spline function of age S(Age) to model non-linear associations): Embedded Image We also estimated the annual rate of change (ARoC) of each global feature by taking the difference in WMM features F between time points over the time passed between time points (scan1&2) indicated by the Δage = agescan2 − agescan1: Embedded Image Global ARoC was corrected for sex, sex × age, and scanner site (as RI): Embedded Image for which then age-correlations were estimated. For regional features, we used simple linear models to support model convergence: Embedded Image For the voxel-level analysis, we estimated one-sample t-tests on the contrast between each time point’s maps within the FA skeleton accounting for age, Δage, scanner site and sex using FSL randomise with 10,000 permutations (H0: Difference = 0).

Finally, we assess the associations between ARoC and PGRS for global and regional WMM metrics adjusting for age, age×sex, and site using simple linear models: Embedded Image For voxel-level analyses, we used TBSS randomise with permutation-based statistics (running 10,000 permutations) (?). Mean maps and between-time-point contrast maps served for the computation of one-sample t-tests for each of the observed metric, while accounting for age, sex and site (i.e., random intercept models): Embedded Image P-values were adjusted for multiple comparison using Bonferroni-correction(56) for global and region-averaged metrics, and family-wise error (FWE)-corrections were used for voxelwise inferential statistics (using Threshold-Free Cluster Enhancement(57)). We report conditional variance explained in the main text Embedded Image, which refers to variance explained by fixed factors.

Results

Cognitive changes

Our analysis suggested no significant time point differences in cognitive measures for the inter-scan interval of Δ =2.44±0.73 (Supplement 16).

Global WMM changes

The globally averaged WMM metrics differed between time points (Cohen’s Embedded Image, dmin = −0.248, dmax = 0.159), with the exception of BRIA - micro ADC, all SMT metrics, and SMTmc - diffusion coefficient (Supplement 3-4).

Congruently, LMER (Eq. 2) outline the effect of time point, in addition to age and sex (Supplement 5a-b). While the effects of time point (Embedded Image, βmin = −0.107, βmax = 0.113), age (Embedded Image, βmin = −0.063, βmax = 0.067), and sex × age (Embedded Image, βmin = −0.619, βmax = 0.197) were significant (p < .001; Supplement 6-7), and modelling diffusion metrics well Embedded Image (Supplement 8), only two diffusion metrics showed significant sensitivity to sex (BRIA micro FA: β = −0.642, p = 0.034, DKI radial kurtosis: β = −0.785, p = 0.022, both lower in males)), and presented large variability (Supplement 5c-d, Supplement 9-10). Moreover, WMM metrics’ age-associations were better modelled as non-linear Embedded Image than linear associations Embedded Image, considering variance explained (Fig. 1). Yet, this difference in model fit was non-significant (p = 0.557). We show decreases in FA, and kurtosis (Embedded Image, βmin = −0.063, βmax = −0.035). At the same time, water diffusivity and extra-axonal water fraction, including free water (mainly cerebro-spinal fluid) increase (Embedded Image, βmin = 0.025, βmax = 0.067). Notably, the intra-axonal water fraction, estimated by different diffusion approaches, exhibit the same behaviour independent of the diffusion approach (lower at higher ages). Finally, we present accelerations of the annual rate of change (ARoC) at higher ages for most global WMM metrics (Fig. 2). Large age-group differences were observed at Cohen’s Embedded Image, |dmin| = 0.015, |dmax| = 1.920 (when including also non-significant findings: Embedded Image, |dmin| = 0.010, |dmax| = 1.92 (see Supplement 18 for details on test statistics, including effect size estimates). Decelerating ARoC were observed for BRIA-DAX intra and extra, and DKI-AK, and relatively stable ARoC for SMT - longitudinal coefficient. See also Supplement 19 for ARoC-age-trends indicating accelerated ageing at Embedded Image, Supplement 20 for uncorrected age-stratification, Supplement 21 for corrected sex-stratification, respectively.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 1.

Global WMM ageing trajectories. WMM values were standardised, mean-centred, and adjusted for covariates of no interest using LMERs. Second, age-WMM relationships were described by linear and non-linear functions.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 2.

Age-stratified annual WMM change. WMM were corrected for age, sex, age×sex and site, and standardized for comparability (without mean-centering). We present p-values for Wilcoxon tests, which were significant at the Bonferroni-corrected * α < 0.05/(26*6) = 3.21 ×10−4, ** α < 0.01/(26*6) = 6.41×10−5, *** α < 0.001/(26*6) = 6.41×10−6, NS = non-significant. The red lines were added as a visual help to identify trends of accelerated or decelerated annual change.

Regional white matter microstructure changes

Estimating paired-samples tests indicate that 47.57% of white matter features decreased (Embedded Image, |dmin| = −0.825, |dmax| = −0.030), 32.30% increased (Embedded Image, |dmin|= 0.283, |dmax| = 0.516) and 20.13% did not change between time points. Most extreme p-values among these unadjusted time-point differences were observed in Fornix (DTI-RD: Embedded Image and the body of the corpus callosum (DTI-FA: Embedded Image, and largest effect sizes of Cohen’s |d| > 0.5 found in the middle cerebellar peduncle (BRIA microAX: dmax = −0.825, 95%CI[−0.875, −0.775]; Fig. 3a).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 3.

Regional white matter microstructure changes between time points and age-associations. Panel (a) presents unadjusted effect sizes (Cohen’s d) versus Bonferroni-adjusted -log10 p-values. Labelling was done using a medium effect size threshold of Cohen’s |d| > 0.5 (also marked with vertical lines) as well as extreme Bonferroni-adjusted p-values of −10log(p) > 500. Panel (b) presents adjusted WMM associations with age. Age-WMM were adjusted for sex, sex×age, scanner site and time point (Eq. 2). The plot presents standardised slopes (β) versus Bonferroni-adjusted -log10 p-values. Labelling was done using a large association of |β| > 0.5 (also marked with vertical lines). BodyCC = body of the corpus callosum, SCP(R) = right superior cerebellar peduncle. MCP = middle cerebellar peduncle, ICP = inferior cerebellar peduncle. SLTF(R) = right superior longitudinal temporal fasciculus. StTer(R) = right stria terminalis. Dotted lines were inserted as visual aid: the lower horizontal dotted line represent the significance level of p = .05 and the upper horizontal line −10log(p) = 500. The vertical lines represented labelling borders based on a medium effect size of Cohen’s |d| > 0.5 (panel a) and large associations of |β| > 0.5 (panel b). Tables with test statistics are available at https://github.com/MaxKorbmacher/Long_Diffusion/.

LMER (Eq. 2), outlined strongest age-associations in fornix WMM (|d| > 0.5; Fig. 3b, see Supplement 13 for distribution of β-values). We also identify various regions sensitive to sex differences and smaller sex age-interaction effects, with repeated occurrence of significant fornix, cerebral peduncle, corticospinal tract, and medial lemniscus differences (Supplement 11,12). Across regions, time point was a non-significant fixed effect (β < 1.5× 10−5, p > .05). For comparability across regions, we used |ARoCs| in association with age, adjusting for age × sex, sex, and site effects, showing accelerated ageing (Embedded Image; Supplement 17).

Voxelwise white matter microstructure changes

When investigating voxelwise changes of WMM between time points (adjusted for age, sex, and scanner site), we find two major patterns examining both increases and decreases in WMM: 1) a global decrease in fractional anisotropy metrics (with the exception of SMT-FA showing distributed changes, including frontal increase and posterior decrease), and 2) an overall decrease in radial, axial and mean diffusivity metrics in orbitofrontal, occipital and brain-stem and cerebellum and increase in superior frontal areas (Table 1). For an overview of the voxelwise WMM maps at corrected α = 0.05 see Supplement 25.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1. Trends in WMM changes.

PGRS Associations

Although annual change in the cerebral peduncle showed the strongest associations with PGRS of AD and global WMM with ADHD, both global Embedded Image and regional Embedded Image WMM-PGRS associations were non-significant after adjusting the α-level for multiple comparisons (Fig. 4a-b). Nevertheless, a highly brain-region-specific pattern of associations between WMM ARoC and PGRS was observed (Fig. 4b) with the medial cerebral peduncle (Fig. 4c) showing the strongest consistent associations with PGRS and specifically associations with AD (|βmax| = 0.053, Embedded Image), and MDD (|βmax| = 0.051, Embedded Image; Fig. 4b-c, see for all peduncle-PGRS associations Supplement 22, indicating strongest ARoC-PGRS Embedded Image associations but weaker non-replicating associations for cross-sectional assessments Embedded Image). Fornix, the most age-sensitive region related strongest to ANX (|βmax| = 0.011, Embedded Image), and OCD PGRS (|βmax| = 0.008, Embedded Image; Supplement 23).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 4.

Associations of PGRS with the rate of white matter change. Panel (a) presents the global associations between PGRS and WMM change. Colours indicate the strength of association (standardised β-coefficients). Panel (b) presents the regional associations between PGRS and WMM change. The dotted line indicates an uncorrected α < 0.001. Labels presenting the respective regions and metrics are supplied above this α-threshold, as well as at |β| > 0.05. Panel (c) presents the regional associations exclusively for the medial cerebral peduncle, the region where the strongest ARoC-PGRS associations were observed. Boxes in panels (a) and (c) indicate the statistical significance at an uncorrected α < 0.05. Note: All associations were adjusted for age, sex, the age × sex interaction, and site. None of the presented associations survived the adjustment of the α-level for multiple comparisons.

Similarly, observing each time point separately, both global and regional WMM were non-significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. However, WMM-PGRS associations were highly similar at the two time points in the longitudinal sample, yet highlighted BIP and SCZ associations (considering puncorrected < 0.05, Fig. 5a-b), did however not replicate in an independent cross-sectional validation sample of N = 31, 056 UKB participants (Fig. 5c). Noteworthy, WMM-PGRS associations were strongest for AD Embedded Image and ANX Embedded Image in the longitudinal sample, but strongest for ADHD Embedded Image, and ASD in the cross-sectional validation sample Embedded Image, Fig. 5d-f).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 5.

Cross-sectional associations between PGRS and WMM in longitudinal and cross-sectional validation data. Panel (a) shows PGRS-associations of globally averaged WMM for time point one in the longitudinal sample N = 2, 329, and panel (b) for time point two, respectively. Panel (c) shows the global WMM-PGRS associations for the cross-sectional validation sample N = 31, 056. Boxes indicate significance at an uncorrected α < 0.05. For simplicity, standardised regression coefficients with |β|< 0.005 were rounded down to β = 0. Panel (d) shows PGRS-associations of regionally averaged WMM for time point one in the longitudinal sample, and panel (e) for time point two. Panel (f) presents the regional associations for the cross-sectional validation sample. The dotted line in panels (d-f) indicates an uncorrected α < 0.001. Labels presenting the respective regions and metrics are supplied above this α threshold, and |β| > 0.001. Note: All associations were adjusted for age, sex, age × sex as fixed effects, and site as random effect, and none of the associations survived the adjustment of the α-level for multiple comparisons.

Overall, ARoC-PGRS association Embedded Image were significantly stronger than cross-sectional effects Embedded Image, d = 0.028, 95%CI[0.004, 0.051], p < .001, Embedded Image, d = 0.001 ± 0.001, d = 0.026, 95%CI[0.003, 0.049], p < 0.031, 95%CI[0.008, 0.054], p < .001 (see Supplement 24 for distribution of effects).

Discussion

We investigated WMM changes using longitudinal UKB diffusion data using a series of diffusion approaches and their associations with PGRS. The comparison between two time points, with an average inter-scan interval of Embedded Image years, was performed at different spatial scales in order to localise the strongest ageing effect and its correlations with other covariates. Unadjusted time point differences in global WMM metrics (Supplement 3) resembled closely the covariate-adjusted time point differences, as well as age effects (Supplement 5a-b). These ageing effects largely confirmed previous findings showing a global decrease of fractional anisotropy and the increase in axial, radial and mean diffusivity for both intra- and extra-axonal space(3, 6, 40, 58– 60), whereas kurtosis metrics decrease with age(3, 6). Note-worthy, we provided evidence for the intra-axonal water fraction estimated by different diffusion approaches demonstrating age-related decrease, accompanied by opposite trends for the extra-axonal water fraction and the CSF water fraction (also known as free water in other diffusion approaches).

We observed accelerated change in global and regional WMM at higher ages. Observed inconsistencies in age dependencies of the annual change in axonal diffusivity stand in contrast to a previous longitudinal study analysing DTI data on the voxel-level(36). Such difference in the localisation of the increased acceleration and in findings on axial diffusivity might be driven by methodological variations: here, we focused on global and regional averages of annual WMM change. Yet, in contrast to the mentioned study(36), another longitudinal investigation did also not detect accelerated axial diffusivity changes(61). However, our study provides larger statistical power than previous longitudinal investigations on the rate of change in WMM (e.g.,(36, 61)), and is hence bench-marking global and regional increases in the rate of WM change at a higher age.

Region-wise investigations allowed for more differentiated results and presented larger ageing effects compared to global WMM metrics (Fig. 3, Supplement 13). Region-level assessments further underlined the strong effect of age on WMM(3, 6, 40, 60, 61). Differences between unadjusted and adjusted associations gave more detail to dependencies of regional WMM age associations on sex and scanner site. Unadjusted associations outlined the cerebellar peduncle, and the superior longitudinal temporal fasciculus as regions with largest age-association, and corpus callosum and fornix as statistically most significantly age-associated regions. After corrections, the fornix was identified as the most significant and strongest age-associated region, which is congruent with previous cross-sectional findings on limbic WMM age associations(3, 4, 40, 62). These WMM age associations also followed the described global pattern of fractional anisotropy metrics decreasing at higher ages, and axial, radial, and mean diffusivity metrics increasing during ageing.

The observed regional fornix changes were moreover clearly delineated in the voxel-level analysis. Additionally, a more general pattern was observed: radial, axial and mean diffusivity metrics increased in superior frontal areas but decreased in more posterior and inferior areas (Table 1, Supplement 25). While previous findings show consistent DTI AD, RD and MD increases and FA decreases across the brain for global and tract measures throughout ageing(60, 63), or particularly in the brain stem(36), no study has yet outlined such differential, non-homogeneous spatial patterns of WMM changes across the brain. Only one other study(64) revealed a similar pattern for DTI when examining cross-sectional AD, RD, and MD tract-age-associations in the UKB, and recent reviews which highlight the frontal lobes as most susceptible to white matter deterioration(65, 66). Potentially, our findings provide additional evidence for the “last-in-first-out” retrogenesis hypothesis, which states that brain areas that develop slowest (such as the prefrontal cortex) are more vulnerable to negative ageing effects, such as degeneration(67). On the other hand, the observed WMM changes might simply map onto frontal GM areas which are most affected by normal ageing processes instead of areas with higher evolutionary expansion(67). Yet, as the age-dependence of frontal WM seems to be partly explained by cognitive ability(68), and cerebrovascular factors(69), frontal WM might be particularly interesting for further clinical dMRI examinations.

In accordance with our previous findings(3, 40), we found that the fornix is highly sensitive to ageing-related changes. The fornix – a C-shaped bundle of nerve-fibres that acts as a major output tract of the hippocampus – is a brain region implicated in various neurological and psychiatric disorders, such as, mild cognitive decline(70), impairment(71, 72), Parkinson’s disease(73), arguably Alzheimer’s disease (compare(74–78), and bipolar disorder(79). Moreover, the genetic architecture of fornix WMM is related to various neurological and psychiatric disorders(80). Bridging such genetics and imaging findings indicates that there are genetic underpinnings for the accelerated ageing of the fornix and other regions, which might explain pathology development. While our findings render the fornix as a promising marker of ageing, future studies need to explore this region as potential therapeutic target.

We identified general patterns of WM changes when applying diffusion approaches at voxelwise scale; namely, 1) global fractional anisotropy metric decreases, and 2) superior axial, radial and mean diffusivity metric increases in superior frontal brain regions, but 3) decreases in posterior regions, the brain stem and the cerebellum. Fractional anisotropy (DTI-FA and BRIA-microFA) decreases suggest different potential biological processes such as a seizing myelination or cell death across the brain (with microFA adding information on the fibre orientation coherence(81), Table 1, Supplement 25) or axonal degradation(82, 83) in combination with intra-axonal water fraction metric. The other diffusion metrics contain information on axial, radial and mean diffusivity and coherently suggested WMM degeneration with increasing age in superior frontal lobes and potential cell-swelling in posterior and subcortical regions where diffusivity decreases. This is congruent with multi-compartment metrics from BRIA, SMT, and WMTI (see Supplement 25). Potentially, the decreases in diffusivity metrics in posterior and subcortical regions depict compensatory mechanisms, accounting for the frontal lobe deterioration. Additional examination of diffusion properties (e.g., using tractography) leveraging both single and multi-shell dMRI might provide further insight into the differential developments of white matter across the adult lifespan.

Finally, this study presents a comprehensive overview of WM association with PGRS of common psychiatric disorders and Alzheimer’s Disease. Moreover, we differentiated between global and regional WM metrics at each time point and the annual rate of change, which led to different association patterns. However, the associations of both WM and annual WM-change with PGRS were non-significant when correcting for multiple comparisons. Previous results demonstrate small associations between WM and PGRS in the UKB for MDD(39), SCZ, BIP(84), and AD(38), as well as in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study(24). For the further highlighting of key associations, we considered uncorrected p-values, examining the PGRS-WM associations as suggestive for potential associations of WM and genetic risk.

Surprisingly, the global annual rate of WMM change associated only with ADHD PGRS. WMM at each time point provided a more nuanced association pattern including ANX, OCD, and AD, similar to previous findings on AD PGRS-WM associations(38). Additionally, similarities between ANX and OCD PGRS associations with WMM might originate from large symptom overlap between these diagnoses(85). This association pattern was however not replicated in an independent cross-sectional portion of the UKB which instead outlined associations with ASD and BIP. Hence, whether these differential association patterns speak to sample-specific gene-brain relationships, or are simply noise due to a lack of statistical power (as a function of small effect sizes) requires follow-up with larger samples, more time points, and larger inter-scan-intervals.

Observing relationships of PGRS with both WMM and its annual rate of change in single regions highlight the brain stem, cerebral peduncle, and the limbic system as potential PGRS-association targets. Importantly, PGRS associations were orders of magnitude stronger for WMM rate of change than for cross-sectional metrics, which underlines the importance of examining the genetic underpinnings of WM in longitudinal data. Notably, areas outlined as most age-sensitive (the fornix and cerebral peduncle) were also the strongest related in their annual change to ANX, ADHD, OCD, and SCZ PGRS. Yet, more longitudinal research is needed to validate the presented findings. Genetic overlaps between fornix WMM and the listed disorders(80), as well as the involvement of the cerebellum, which is connected with the cortex via the cerebral peduncles, in various psychiatric disorders, gives additional insight into the role of genetic makeup for WMM development(86). Furthermore, the cerebral peduncles were particularly associated with AD, ADHD, and OCD PGRS, but also with ANX, BIP, MDD, and SCZ PGRS. This spatially specific pattern of PGRS associations emphasises the usefulness of regional investigations, due to highly spatially distributed influence of genetics. While the small effect sizes limit inferences on WMM-PGRS associations, the highlighted associations of PGRS and WMM change are worth further investigation.

There are several limitations to be mentioned in the context of this study. First, the age range was limited to individuals older than 40 years, allowing only for generalisations across mid-to-late adulthood. Future studies should consider large samples to cover the whole lifespan, particularly when the objective is to investigate WM ageing or to investigate generalisable associations of WM with genotypes and phenotypes. Second, the inter-scan interval was relatively short Embedded Image years). Longer inter-scan intervals might reveal clearer information on accelerated WMM ageing processes at different ages and their genetic underpinnings. Longer intervals are also useful to examine the relationship of cognitive decline and WMM. Third, we used a relatively homogeneous, non-diverse sample including nearly exclusively white UK citizens, which limits the generalisability beyond white Northern Europeans and US Americans in their midlife to older age. Additionally, although the sample size was larger than in previous longitudinal WMM investigations, power was still limited to find PGRS associations (presenting small effects). The volunteer-based sampling of the UKB participants might additionally have introduced bias, reducing generalisability to the UK population(87). Yet, the imaging sample of the UKB shows an additional positive health bias (better physical and mental health) over the rest of the UKB sample(88), rendering this sub-sample as even less representative of the UK population. However, this might not necessarily be a disadvantage considering the objective of this study, which was to map WM change in healthy mid-to-late life adults and associate polygenic risk with the observed WM changes. Fourth, conservative corrections of the α-level using Bonferroni corrections might have led to false negatives, especially for the small observed effects of PGRS on the annual change in regional WMM where many associations were explored. Finally, the fornix, the key region of the presented regional WMM changes, is a region susceptible of free water contamination due to its closeness to the cerebrospinal fluid(2) and has previously been suspected of partial volume effects(62). Hence, findings on this region need to be interpreted carefully.

To conclude, our findings provide insight about short-term WM changes indicating degradation processes indicated by lower FA, kurtosis, intra-axonal water fraction, and higher diffusivity, free water, and extra axonal water fraction. These changes are associated with the de-myelination and structural disintegration across the adult brain as a consequence of ageing without strong or detectable cognitive decline. Demyelination and WM features degradation primarily affect frontal brain regions, whereas posterior regions as well as brain stem and cerebellum show opposing trends. Further investigations should focus on fornix WMM changes throughout the lifespan to investigate health and disease outcomes, and the role in such of the genetic architecture of the cerebellar peduncle in such white matter changes and disease development.

Data Availability

Data are available from the UK Biobank (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/).

https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Max Korbmacher: Study design, Software, Quality control, Formal analysis, Visualizations, Project administration, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. Dennis van der Meer: Software, Writing – review & editing. Eli Eikefjord: Funding acquisition. Dani Beck: Writing—review & editing. Daniel E. Askeland-Gjerde: Writing—review & editing. Ole A. Andreassen: Writing—review & editing, Funding acquisition. Lars T. Westlye: Writing—review & editing, Funding acquisition. Ivan I. Maximov: Supervision, Study design, Software, Data preprocessing and quality control, Writing—review & editing, Funding acquisition.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

OAA has received a speaker’s honorarium from Lundbeck and is a consultant to Coretechs.ai.

DATA AND CODE AVAILABILITY

All raw data are available from the UKB5 (www.ukbiobank.ac.uk). Analysis code and extended supplementary files will be made available at the time of publication at https://github.com/MaxKorbmacher/Long_Diffusion.

Supplementary Note 1 The utilized white matter quality control pipeline

In brief, YTTRIUM (41) converts dMRI scalar metrics into 2D format, using a structural similarity (89, 90) extension of each scalar map to their mean image in order to create a 2D distribution of image and diffusion parameters. These quality assessments are based on a 2-step clustering algorithm applied to identify subjects located out of the main distribution. Additionally, rows including impossible values, such as diffusion coefficients d: 0 < d < 4 μm2 · ms, kurtosis values K 0 < K < 3, and FA values 0 < FA < 1 were excluded. QC of the mean skeleton values rendered N = 622 datasets of the BRIA metric extra-axonal radial diffusivity (DRADextra) as such impossible values, and examining regional and tract averages N = 643 of the WMTI metric axial extra-axonal diffusivity (axEAD). Due to the relatively large share of these outliers on the total sample, we excluded these metrics from the analyses.

Supplementary Note 2 Description of white matter features by diffusion approaches

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Supplementary Note 3 Effect sizes for unadjusted microstructure changes between time points

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 4 Test statistics for time point differences for global diffusion metrics

The table presents mean (M), standard deviation (SD) for each time point (TP), T-statistic (T), uncorrected p-value (p), Bonferroni-corrected p-value pBonf, and Cohen’s d with 95% CI as effect size.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Supplementary Note 5 Effects of age, time point, sex and the age-sex interaction on global diffusion metrics in LMER

Standardized β values ± Standard Error indicating the fixed effects of (a) age, (b) time point, (c) sex, and (d) sex×age on global diffusion metrics. The colour indicates the metric’s corresponding diffusion approach.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 6 Test statistics for the effect of age on global diffusion metrics in LMER

βstd refers to the standardized slopes and SE to the standard error.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Supplementary Note 7 The effect of time point on global diffusion metrics in mixed linear models

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Supplementary Note 8 Mixed linear model diagnostics

The following table shows the model diagnostics when predicting diffusion metrics from age, sex, age × sex, and time point, while accounting for the participants nested in scanner site as random intercept.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Supplementary Note 9 The effect of sex on global diffusion metrics in LMER

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Supplementary Note 10 The effect of the sex-age interaction on global diffusion metrics in LMER

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Supplementary Note 11 The effect of the sex on regional WMM metrics

Increases refer to higher WMM values for males compared to females and decrease to lower WMM values, respectively.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 12 The effect of the sex-age interaction on regional WMM metrics

Increases refer for higher WMM values for males at higher ages compared to females and decrease to lower WMM values, respectively.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 13 Distribution of the effect of age on regional WMM metrics

Estimating average slopes from all β-values results in the following meta-statistics for negative β-values (left side of 0): Mean = -0.21±0.13, Median = -0.23± 0.12. For positive β-values (right side of 0) the following averages were estimated: Mean = 0.25±0.13, Median = 0.27± 0.14.

Estimating average slopes from significant effects only (right panel) results in similar meta-statistics for negative β-values (left side of 0): Mean = -0.21±0.13, Median = -0.24± 0.12, as well as for positive β-values (right side of 0): Mean = 0.25±0.13, Median = 0.27± 0.15.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 14 Adjusted cross-sectional associations between global WMM and age at time point 1

Age-WMM relationships were adjusted for sex, the sex-age interaction, and site with the fit indicated for each time point.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 15 Adjusted cross-sectional associations between global WMM and age at time point 1

Age-WMM relationships were adjusted for sex, the sex-age interaction, and site with the fit indicated for each time point.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 16 Cognitive test differences between time points

Pair matches refers to incorrectly solved pair matches (executed in 3 rounds). Digits refers to the maximum number of digits remembered; intelligence to fluid intelligence; memory to prospective memory; health to a rating of the own overall health; matrix RTs refer to matrix puzzle completion times; matrix correct to the number of correctly solved matrix puzzles; matrix viewed to the number of viewed matrix puzzles; tower correct to the number of correctly solved tower puzzles; and Sym/Dig matches to the number of correct symbol-digit matches.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Supplementary Note 17 Distribution of the relationship between age and the absolute annual rate of white matter microstructure change

The Figure shows the distribution of adjusted |ARoC|-age associations across brain regions Embedded Image. Mean associations were smaller when including non-significant associations Embedded Image.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 18 Age-stratified annual rate of WMM change group-comparisons

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2 Age-stratified annual rate of WMM change group-comparisons

Supplementary Note 19 Adjusted annual rate of WMM change throughout ages

WMM are standardised for comparability without mean centering for a better understanding of onset values. Non-linear curves were fitted, using splines of generalized additive models, and Pearson’s correlation coefficients were estimated (top left in each plot). We present uncorrected p-values, which were significant at the Bonferroni-corrected α < 0.05/26 = 0.0019. Additionally, we estimated associations between |ARoC| and age (to meaningfully estimate meta-statistics), showing a higher |ARoC| at higher ages Embedded Image, with a slightly lower average slopes when considering non-significant age-|ARoC| associations Embedded Image

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 20 Unadjusted annual rate of WMM change throughout ages

WMM are standardised for comparability without mean centering for a better understanding of onset values. Red lines were implemented as visual aid.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 21 Corrected sex- and age-stratified annual rate of WMM change

WMM are standardised for comparability (including mean centering). Red colours indicate females and blue colours males.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 22 Regional associations between WMM change in the Cerebral Peduncle and PGRS

Panel (a) presents the associations between PGRS and WMM change. Panel (b) presents the regional associations between PGRS and cross-sectional regional WMM at time point one. Panel (c) presents the cross-sectional regional WMM associations with PGRS at time point two. Panel (d) presents cross-sectional regional associations between WMM and PGRS for the validation sample. Boxes the statistical significance at an uncorrected α < 0.05. Colours indicate the association strength (standardised β-coefficients). Note: All associations were adjusted for age, sex, the age × sex interaction, and site. None of the presented associations survived the adjustment of the α-level for multiple comparisons.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 23 Regional associations between WMM change in the Fornix and PGRS

Panel (a) presents the associations between PGRS and WMM change. Panel (b) presents the regional associations between PGRS and cross-sectional regional WMM at time point one. Panel (c) presents the cross-sectional regional WMM associations with PGRS at time point two. Panel (d) presents cross-sectional regional associations between WMM and PGRS for the validation sample. Boxes the statistical significance at an uncorrected α < 0.05. Colours indicate the association strength (standardised β-coefficients). Note: All associations were adjusted for age, sex, the age × sex interaction, and site. None of the presented associations survived the adjustment of the α-level for multiple comparisons.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 24 Distribution of the relationship between PGRS and both the annual rate of WMM change as well as cross-sectional WMM

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 25 Voxel-level changes in BRIA - DAX extra

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ± 4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 26 Voxel-level changes in BRIA - DAX intra

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ± 4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 27 Voxel-level changes in BRIA - DAX intra

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 28 Voxel-level changes in BRIA - microADC

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ± 4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 29 Voxel-level changes in BRIA - microAX

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ± 4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 30 Voxel-level changes in BRIA - microFA

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 31 Voxel-level changes in BRIA - microRD

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 32 Voxel-level changes in BRIA - Vcsf

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 33 Voxel-level changes in BRIA - Vextra

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 34 Voxel-level changes in BRIA - Vintra

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 35 Voxel-level changes in DKI - AK

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 36 Voxel-level changes in DKI - MK

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 37 Voxel-level changes in DKI - RK

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 38 Voxel-level changes in DTI - AD

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 39 Voxel-level changes in DTI - FA

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ± 4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 40 Voxel-level changes in DTI - MD

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 41 Voxel-level changes in DTI - RD

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 42 Voxel-level changes in SMTmc - diffusion coefficient

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 43 Voxel-level changes in SMTmc - extra MD

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 44 Voxel-level changes in SMTmc - extra trans

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 45 Voxel-level changes in SMTmc - intra

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 46 Voxel-level changes in WMT - AWF

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 47 Voxel-level changes in WMTI - axEAD

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 48 Voxel-level changes in WMTI - radEAD

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 49 Voxel-level changes in SMT - FA

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 50 Voxel-level changes in SMT - MD

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 51 Voxel-level changes in SMT - longitudinal diffusion coefficient

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Supplementary Note 52 Voxel-level changes in SMT - transverse diffusion coefficient

Red to yellow colour indicate increases, dark to light blue colours decreases in, respectively, where the scale is determined by the α-level ranging from 0.05 towards 0. MNI152 X:0, Y:-18, Z: 18 are indicated by the cursor with slices spacing of ±4 steps along the z-axis in the coordinate system.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study has been conducted using UKB data under Application 27412. UKB has received ethics approval from the National Health Service National Research Ethics Service (ref 11/NW/0382). The work was performed on the Service for Sensitive Data (TSD) platform, owned by the University of Oslo, operated and developed by the TSD service group at the University of Oslo IT-Department (USIT). Computations were performed using resources provided by UNINETT Sigma2 – the National Infrastructure for High Performance Computing and Data Storage in Norway. Finally, we want to thank all UKB participants and facilitators who made this research possible.

This research was funded by the Research Council of Norway (#223273, #300767); the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (#2022080, #2019101); and the European Union’s Horizon2020 Research and Innovation Programme (#847776, #802998).

References

  1. 1.↵
    Sheelakumari Raghavan, Robert I Reid, Scott A Przybelski, Timothy G Lesnick, Jonathan Graff-Radford, Christopher G Schwarz, David S Knopman, Michelle M Mielke, Mary M Machulda, Ronald C Petersen, et al. Diffusion models reveal white matter microstructural changes with ageing, pathology and cognition. Brain communications, 3(2):fcab106, 2021.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    Rafael Neto Henriques, Richard Henson, Marta Morgado Correia, et al. Unique information from common diffusion mri models about white-matter differences across the human adult lifespan. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09942, 2023.
  3. 3.↵
    Max Korbmacher, Ann Marie de Lange, Dennis van der Meer, Dani Beck, Eli Eikefjord, Arvid Lundervold, Ole A Andreassen, Lars T Westlye, and Ivan I Maximov. Brain-wide associations between white matter and age highlight the role of fornix microstructure in brain ageing. Human brain mapping, 44(10), 2023.
  4. 4.↵
    Ahmed Salih, Ilaria Boscolo Galazzo, Zahra Raisi-Estabragh, Elisa Rauseo, Polyxeni Gkontra, Steffen E Petersen, Karim Lekadir, André Altmann, Petia Radeva, and Gloria Menegaz. Brain age estimation at tract group level and its association with daily life measures, cardiac risk factors and genetic variants. Scientific Reports, 11(1):20563, 2021.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.
    Oktay Agcaoglu, R Miller, Andy R Mayer, Kenneth Hugdahl, and Vince D Calhoun. Lateralization of resting state networks and relationship to age and gender. Neuroimage, 104: 310–325, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Dani Beck, Ann-Marie G de Lange, Ivan I Maximov, Geneviève Richard, Ole A Andreassen, Jan E Nordvik, and Lars T Westlye. White matter microstructure across the adult lifespan: A mixed longitudinal and cross-sectional study using advanced diffusion models and brainage prediction. NeuroImage, 224:117441, 2021.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    Dani Beck, Lia Ferschmann, Niamh MacSweeney, Linn B Norbom, Thea Wiker, Eira Aksnes, Valerie Karl, Fanny Dégeilh, Madelene Holm, Kathryn L Mills, et al. Puberty differentially predicts brain maturation in male and female youth: A longitudinal abcd study. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, page 101261, 2023.
  8. 8.↵
    Stine K Krogsrud, Anders M Fjell, Christian K Tamnes, Håkon Grydeland, Lia Mork, Paulina Due-Tønnessen, Atle Bjørnerud, Cassandra Sampaio-Baptista, Jesper Andersson, Heidi Johansen-Berg, et al. Changes in white matter microstructure in the developing brain—a longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging study of children from 4 to 11 years of age. Neuroimage, 124:473–486, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.
    Christian K Tamnes, David R Roalf, Anne-Lise Goddings, and Catherine Lebel. Diffusion mri of white matter microstructure development in childhood and adolescence: Methods, challenges and progress. Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 33:161–175, 2018.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    Catherine Lebel, Sarah Treit, and Christian Beaulieu. A review of diffusion mri of typical white matter development from early childhood to young adulthood. NMR in Biomedicine, 32(4):e3778, 2019.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    Lars T Westlye, Kristine B Walhovd, Anders M Dale, Atle Bjørnerud, Paulina Due-Tønnessen, Andreas Engvig, Håkon Grydeland, Christian K Tamnes, Ylva Østby, and Anders M Fjell. Life-span changes of the human brain white matter: diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and volumetry. Cerebral cortex, 20(9):2055–2068, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Rikka Kjelkenes, Thomas Wolfers, Dag Alnæs, Linn B Norbom, Irene Voldsbekk, Madelene Holm, Andreas Dahl, Pierre Berthet, Christian K Tamnes, Andre F Marquand, et al. Deviations from normative brain white and gray matter structure are associated with psychopathology in youth. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 58:101173, 2022.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    Moriah E Thomason and Paul M Thompson. Diffusion imaging, white matter, and psychopathology. Annual review of clinical psychology, 7:63–85, 2011.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    Raza Sagarwala and Henry A Nasrallah. White matter pathology is shared across multiple psychiatric brain disorders: Is abnormal diffusivity a transdiagnostic biomarker for psychopathology? Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry, 2:100010, 2020.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    Autism Spectrum Disorders Working Group of The Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. Meta-analysis of gwas of over 16,000 individuals with autism spectrum disorder highlights a novel locus at 10q24. 32 and a significant overlap with schizophrenia. Molecular autism, 8:1–17, 2017.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    Ditte Demontis, Raymond K Walters, Joanna Martin, Manuel Mattheisen, Thomas D Als, Esben Agerbo, Gísli Baldursson, Rich Belliveau, Jonas Bybjerg-Grauholm, Marie Bækvad-Hansen, et al. Discovery of the first genome-wide significant risk loci for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Nature genetics, 51(1):63–75, 2019.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Paul D Arnold, Kathleen D Askland, Cristina Barlassina, Laura Bellodi, OJ Bienvenu, Donald Black, Michael Bloch, Helena Brentani, Christie L Burton, Beatriz Camarena, et al. Revealing the complex genetic architecture of obsessive-compulsive disorder using meta-analysis. Molecular psychiatry, 23(5):1181–1181, 2018.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    Takeshi Otowa, Karin Hek, Minyoung Lee, Enda M Byrne, Saira S Mirza, Michel G Nivard, Timothy Bigdeli, Steven H Aggen, Daniel Adkins, Aaron Wolen, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of anxiety disorders. Molecular psychiatry, 21(10):1391–1399, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Naomi R Wray, Stephan Ripke, Manuel Mattheisen, Maciej Trzaskowski, Enda M Byrne, Abdel Abdellaoui, Mark J Adams, Esben Agerbo, Tracy M Air, Till MF Andlauer, et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify 44 risk variants and refine the genetic architecture of major depression. Nature genetics, 50(5):668–681, 2018.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Douglas P Wightman, Iris E Jansen, Jeanne E Savage, Alexey A Shadrin, Shahram Bahrami, Dominic Holland, Arvid Rongve, Sigrid Børte, Bendik S Winsvold, Ole Kristian Drange, et al. A genome-wide association study with 1,126,563 individuals identifies new risk loci for alzheimer’s disease. Nature genetics, 53(9):1276–1282, 2021.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    Niamh Mullins, Andreas J Forstner, Kevin S O’Connell, Brandon Coombes, Jonathan RI Coleman, Zhen Qiao, Thomas D Als, Tim B Bigdeli, Sigrid Børte, Julien Bryois, et al. Genome-wide association study of more than 40,000 bipolar disorder cases provides new insights into the underlying biology. Nature genetics, 53(6):817–829, 2021.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Vassily Trubetskoy, Antonio F Pardiñas, Ting Qi, Georgia Panagiotaropoulou, Swapnil Awasthi, Tim B Bigdeli, Julien Bryois, Chia-Yen Chen, Charlotte A Dennison, Lynsey S Hall, et al. Mapping genomic loci implicates genes and synaptic biology in schizophrenia. Nature, 604(7906):502–508, 2022.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    Jean-Charles Lambert, Carla A Ibrahim-Verbaas, Denise Harold, Adam C Naj, Rebecca Sims, Céline Bellenguez, Gyungah Jun, Anita L DeStefano, Joshua C Bis, Gary W Beecham, et al. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for alzheimer’s disease. Nature genetics, 45(12):1452–1458, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    Sara Fernandez-Cabello, Dag Alnæs, Dennis van der Meer, Andreas Dahl, Madelene Holm, Rikka Kjelkenes, Ivan I Maximov, Linn B Norbom, Mads L Pedersen, Irene Voldsbekk, et al. Associations between brain imaging and polygenic scores of mental health and educational attainment in children aged 9–11. NeuroImage, 263:119611, 2022.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    Dennis van der Meer and Tobias Kaufmann. Mapping the genetic architecture of cortical morphology through neuroimaging: progress and perspectives. Translational Psychiatry, 12 (1):447, 2022.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    Dennis Van der Meer, Alexey A Shadrin, Kevin O’Connell, Francesco Bettella, Srdjan Djurovic, Thomas Wolfers, Dag Alnæs, Ingrid Agartz, Olav B Smeland, Ingrid Melle, et al. Boosting schizophrenia genetics by utilizing genetic overlap with brain morphology. Biological psychiatry, 92(4):291–298, 2022.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. 27.↵
    Els Fieremans, Jens H Jensen, and Joseph A Helpern. White matter characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging. Neuroimage, 58(1):177–188, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Jens H Jensen, Joseph A Helpern, Anita Ramani, Hanzhang Lu, and Kyle Kaczynski. Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 53(6):1432–1440, 2005.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    Enrico Kaden, Nathaniel D Kelm, Robert P Carson, Mark D Does, and Daniel C Alexander. Multi-compartment microscopic diffusion imaging. NeuroImage, 139:346–359, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Enrico Kaden, Frithjof Kruggel, and Daniel C Alexander. Quantitative mapping of the peraxon diffusion coefficients in brain white matter. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 75(4): 1752–1763, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    Marco Reisert, Elias Kellner, Bibek Dhital, Juergen Hennig, and Valerij G Kiselev. Disentangling micro from mesostructure by diffusion MRI: a Bayesian approach. Neuroimage, 147: 964–975, 2017.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    Miguel Ángel Araque Caballero, Marc Suárez-Calvet, Marco Duering, Nicolai Franzmeier, Tammie Benzinger, Anne M Fagan, Randall J Bateman, Clifford R Jack, Johannes Levin, Martin Dichgans, et al. White matter diffusion alterations precede symptom onset in autosomal dominant alzheimer’s disease. Brain, 141(10):3065–3080, 2018.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    Peter J Basser, James Mattiello, and Denis LeBihan. Mr diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophysical journal, 66(1):259–267, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    Adam R Pines, Matthew Cieslak, Bart Larsen, Graham L Baum, Philip A Cook, Azeez Adebimpe, Diego G Dávila, Mark A Elliott, Robert Jirsaraie, Kristin Murtha, et al. Leveraging multi-shell diffusion for studies of brain development in youth and young adulthood. Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 43:100788, 2020.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    Thomas R Barrick, Rebecca A Charlton, Chris A Clark, and Hugh S Markus. White matter structural decline in normal ageing: a prospective longitudinal study using tract-based spatial statistics. Neuroimage, 51(2):565–577, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    Claire E Sexton, Kristine B Walhovd, Andreas B Storsve, Christian K Tamnes, Lars T Westlye, Heidi Johansen-Berg, and Anders M Fjell. Accelerated changes in white matter microstructure during aging: a longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(46):15425–15436, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    Fidel Alfaro-Almagro, Mark Jenkinson, Neal K Bangerter, Jesper LR Andersson, Ludovica Griffanti, Gwenaëlle Douaud, Stamatios N Sotiropoulos, Saad Jbabdi, Moises Hernandez-Fernandez, Emmanuel Vallee, et al. Image processing and quality control for the first 10,000 brain imaging datasets from uk biobank. Neuroimage, 166:400–424, 2018.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    Xiao-Yu He, Bang-Sheng Wu, Kevin Kuo, Wei Zhang, Qing Ma, Shi-Tong Xiang, Yu-Zhu Li, Zi-yi Wang, Qiang Dong, Jian-Feng Feng, et al. Association between polygenic risk for alzheimer’s disease and brain structure in children and adults. Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy, 15(1):1–12, 2023.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.↵
    Miruna C Barbu, Yanni Zeng, Xueyi Shen, Simon R Cox, Toni-Kim Clarke, Jude Gibson, Mark J Adams, Mandy Johnstone, Chris S Haley, Stephen M Lawrie, et al. Association of whole-genome and netrin1 signaling pathway–derived polygenic risk scores for major depressive disorder and white matter microstructure in the uk biobank. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 4(1):91–100, 2019.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    Max Korbmacher, Dennis van der Meer, Dani Beck, Ann-Marie G de Lange, Eli Eikefjord, Arvid Lundervold, Ole Andreassen, Lars T Westlye, and Ivan I Maximov. Brain asymmetries from midlife to old adulthood and hemispheric brain age. bioRxiv, pages 2023–08, 2023.
  41. 41.↵
    Ivan I Maximov, Dennis van Der Meer, Ann-Marie G de Lange, Tobias Kaufmann, Alexey Shadrin, Oleksandr Frei, Thomas Wolfers, and Lars T Westlye. Fast qualitY conTrol meThod foR derIved diffUsion Metrics (YTTRIUM) in big data analysis: UK Biobank 18,608 example. Human brain mapping, 42(10):3141–3155, 2021.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.↵
    Karla L Miller, Fidel Alfaro-Almagro, Neal K Bangerter, David L Thomas, Essa Yacoub, Junqian Xu, Andreas J Bartsch, Saad Jbabdi, Stamatios N Sotiropoulos, Jesper LR Andersson, et al. Multimodal population brain imaging in the UK Biobank prospective epidemiological study. Nature neuroscience, 19(11):1523–1536, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    Cathie Sudlow, John Gallacher, Naomi Allen, Valerie Beral, Paul Burton, John Danesh, Paul Downey, Paul Elliott, Jane Green, Martin Landray, et al. UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS medicine, 12(3):e1001779, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    Jelle Veraart, Els Fieremans, and Dmitry S Novikov. Diffusion MRI noise mapping using random matrix theory. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 76(5):1582–1593, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    Elias Kellner, Bibek Dhital, Valerij G Kiselev, and Marco Reisert. Gibbs-ringing artifact removal based on local subvoxel-shifts. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 76(5):1574–1581, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    Jesper LR Andersson and Stamatios N Sotiropoulos. An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging. Neuroimage, 125: 1063–1078, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    Stephen M Smith, Mark Jenkinson, Mark W Woolrich, Christian F Beckmann, Timothy EJ Behrens, Heidi Johansen-Berg, Peter R Bannister, Marilena De Luca, Ivana Drobnjak, David E Flitney, et al. Advances in functional and structural mr image analysis and implementation as fsl. Neuroimage, 23:S208–S219, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    Mark Jenkinson, Christian F Beckmann, Timothy EJ Behrens, Mark W Woolrich, and Stephen M Smith. FSL. Neuroimage, 62(2):782–790, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    Stephen M Smith, Mark Jenkinson, Heidi Johansen-Berg, Daniel Rueckert, Thomas E Nichols, Clare E Mackay, Kate E Watkins, Olga Ciccarelli, M Zaheer Cader, Paul M Matthews, et al. Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage, 31(4):1487–1505, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    Stephen M Smith. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Human brain mapping, 17(3): 143–155, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    S Mori, S Wakana, LM Nagae-Poetscher, and PCM Van Zijl. MRI atlas of human white matter. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 27(6):1384, 2006.
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.↵
    Kegang Hua, Jiangyang Zhang, Setsu Wakana, Hangyi Jiang, Xin Li, Daniel S Reich, Peter A Calabresi, James J Pekar, Peter CM van Zijl, and Susumu Mori. Tract probability maps in stereotaxic spaces: analyses of white matter anatomy and tract-specific quantification. Neuroimage, 39(1):336–347, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    Shing Wan Choi and Paul F O’Reilly. Prsice-2: Polygenic risk score software for biobank-scale data. Gigascience, 8(7):giz082, 2019.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    Kaylyn Clark, Yuk Yee Leung, Wan-Ping Lee, Benjamin Voight, and Li-San Wang. Polygenic risk scores in alzheimer’s disease genetics: methodology, applications, inclusion, and diversity. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 89(1):1–12, 2022.
    OpenUrl
  55. 55.↵
    Jack Euesden, Cathryn M Lewis, and Paul F O’reilly. Prsice: polygenic risk score software. Bioinformatics, 31(9):1466–1468, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    Tyler J VanderWeele and Maya B Mathur. Some desirable properties of the bonferroni correction: is the bonferroni correction really so bad? American journal of epidemiology, 188(3):617–618, 2019.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  57. 57.↵
    Stephen M Smith and Thomas E Nichols. Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage, 44(1):83–98, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  58. 58.↵
    Live Eikenes, Eelke Visser, Torgil Vangberg, and Asta K Håberg. Both brain size and biological sex contribute to variation in white matter microstructure in middle-aged healthy adults. Human Brain Mapping, 44(2):691–709, 2023.
    OpenUrl
  59. 59.
    Jenna L Merenstein, María M Corrada, Claudia H Kawas, and Ilana J Bennett. Age affects white matter microstructure and episodic memory across the older adult lifespan. Neurobiology of aging, 106:282–291, 2021.
    OpenUrl
  60. 60.↵
    Kurt G Schilling, Derek Archer, Fang-Cheng Yeh, Francois Rheault, Leon Y Cai, Colin Hansen, Qi Yang, Karthik Ramdass, Andrea T Shafer, Susan M Resnick, et al. Aging and white matter microstructure and macrostructure: a longitudinal multi-site diffusion mri study of 1218 participants. Brain Structure and Function, 227(6):2111–2125, 2022.
    OpenUrl
  61. 61.↵
    Andrew R Bender, Manuel C Völkle, and Naftali Raz. Differential aging of cerebral white matter in middle-aged and older adults: a seven-year follow-up. Neuroimage, 125:74–83, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. 62.↵
    Yisu Yang, Kurt Schilling, Niranjana Shashikumar, Varuna Jasodanand, Elizabeth E Moore, Kimberly R Pechman, Murat Bilgel, Lori L Beason-Held, Yang An, Andrea Shafer, et al. White matter microstructural metrics are sensitively associated with clinical staging in alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, 15(2):e12425, 2023.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. 63.↵
    Haichao Zhao, Wei Wen, Jian Cheng, Jiyang Jiang, Nicole Kochan, Haijun Niu, Henry Brodaty, Perminder Sachdev, and Tao Liu. An accelerated degeneration of white matter microstructure and networks in the nondemented old–old. Cerebral Cortex, 33(8):4688–4698, 2023.
    OpenUrl
  64. 64.↵
    Wen-Yih Isaac Tseng, Yung-Chin Hsu, Chang-Le Chen, Yun-Jing Kang, Te-Wei Kao, Pin-Yu Chen, and Gordon D Waiter. Microstructural differences in white matter tracts across middle to late adulthood: a diffusion mri study on 7167 uk biobank participants. Neurobiology of Aging, 98:160–172, 2021.
    OpenUrl
  65. 65.↵
    Faith M Gunning-Dixon, Adam M Brickman, Janice C Cheng, and George S Alexopoulos. Aging of cerebral white matter: a review of mri findings. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: A journal of the psychiatry of late life and allied sciences, 24(2):109–117, 2009.
    OpenUrl
  66. 66.↵
    M Ethan MacDonald and G Bruce Pike. Mri of healthy brain aging: A review. NMR in Biomedicine, 34(9):e4564, 2021.
    OpenUrl
  67. 67.↵
    Anders M Fjell, Linda McEvoy, Dominic Holland, Anders M Dale, Kristine B Walhovd, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, et al. What is normal in normal aging? effects of aging, amyloid and alzheimer’s disease on the cerebral cortex and the hippocampus. Progress in neurobiology, 117:20–40, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. 68.↵
    Jan Willem Koten Jr, Karl Koschutnig, and Guilherme Wood. An attempt to model the causal structure behind white matter aging and cognitive decline. Scientific Reports, 13(1):10883, 2023.
    OpenUrl
  69. 69.↵
    Prashanthi Vemuri, Jonathan Graff-Radford, Timothy G Lesnick, Scott A Przybelski, Robert I Reid, Ashritha L Reddy, Val J Lowe, Michelle M Mielke, Mary M Machulda, Ronald C Petersen, et al. White matter abnormalities are key components of cerebrovascular disease impacting cognitive decline. Brain Communications, 3(2):fcab076, 2021.
    OpenUrl
  70. 70.↵
    Andrea T Shafer, Owen A Williams, Evian Perez, Yang An, Bennett A Landman, Luigi Ferrucci, and Susan M Resnick. Accelerated decline in white matter microstructure in subsequently impaired older adults and its relationship with cognitive decline. Brain communications, 4(2):fcac051, 2022.
    OpenUrl
  71. 71.↵
    Yumeng Ju, Wenwen Ou, Jingzhi Su, Christopher L Averill, Jin Liu, Mi Wang, Zhen Wang, Yan Zhang, Bangshan Liu, Lingjiang Li, et al. White matter microstructural alterations in posttraumatic stress disorder: An roi and whole-brain based meta-analysis. Journal of affective disorders, 266:655–670, 2020.
    OpenUrl
  72. 72.↵
    Junhong Yu, Charlene LM Lam, and Tatia MC Lee. White matter microstructural abnormalities in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: A meta-analysis of whole-brain and roi-based studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 83:405–416, 2017.
    OpenUrl
  73. 73.↵
    Xia Wei, Chunyan Luo, Qian Li, Na Hu, Yuan Xiao, Nian Liu, Su Lui, and Qiyong Gong. White matter abnormalities in patients with parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging using tract-based spatial statistics. Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 12: 610962, 2021.
    OpenUrl
  74. 74.↵
    John M Ringman, Joseph O’Neill, Daniel Geschwind, Luis Medina, Liana G Apostolova, Yaneth Rodriguez, Barbara Schaffer, Arousiak Varpetian, Benjamin Tseng, Freddy Ortiz, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in preclinical and presymptomatic carriers of familial alzheimer’s disease mutations. Brain, 130(7):1767–1776, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  75. 75.
    X Li, E Westman, AK Ståhlbom, S Thordardottir, Ove Almkvist, K Blennow, L-O Wahlund, and C Graff. White matter changes in familial alzheimer’s disease. Journal of internal medicine, 278(2):211–218, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  76. 76.
    Nhat Trung Doan, Andreas Engvig, Karin Persson, Dag Alnæs, Tobias Kaufmann, Jaroslav Rokicki, Aldo Córdova-Palomera, Torgeir Moberget, Anne Brækhus, Maria Lage Barca, et al. Dissociable diffusion mri patterns of white matter microstructure and connectivity in alzheimer’s disease spectrum. Scientific reports, 7(1):45131, 2017.
    OpenUrl
  77. 77.
    Fang Ji, Ofer Pasternak, Kwun Kei Ng, Joanna Su Xian Chong, Siwei Liu, Liwen Zhang, Hee Youn Shim, Yng Miin Loke, Boon Yeow Tan, Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian, et al. White matter microstructural abnormalities and default network degeneration are associated with early memory deficit in alzheimer’s disease continuum. Scientific reports, 9 (1):4749, 2019.
    OpenUrl
  78. 78.↵
    Lotte GM Cremers, Frank J Wolters, Marius de Groot, M Kamran Ikram, Aad van Der Lugt, Wiro J Niessen, Meike W Vernooij, and M Arfan Ikram. Structural disconnectivity and the risk of dementia in the general population. Neurology, 95(11):e1528–e1537, 2020.
    OpenUrl
  79. 79.↵
    Pauline Favre, Melissa Pauling, Jacques Stout, Franz Hozer, Samuel Sarrazin, Christoph Abé, Martin Alda, Clara Alloza, Silvia Alonso-Lana, Ole A Andreassen, et al. Widespread white matter microstructural abnormalities in bipolar disorder: evidence from mega-and meta-analyses across 3033 individuals. Neuropsychopharmacology, 44(13):2285–2293, 2019.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. 80.↵
    Ya-Nan Ou, Yi-Jun Ge, Bang-Sheng Wu, Yi Zhang, Yu-Chao Jiang, Kevin Kuo, Liu Yang, Lan Tan, Jian-Feng Feng, Wei Cheng, et al. The genetic architecture of fornix white matter microstructure and their involvement in neuropsychiatric disorders. Translational Psychiatry, 13(1):180, 2023.
    OpenUrl
  81. 81.↵
    Filip Szczepankiewicz, Samo Lasič, Danielle van Westen, Pia C Sundgren, Elisabet Englund, Carl-Fredrik Westin, Freddy Ståhlberg, Jimmy Lätt, Daniel Topgaard, and Markus Nilsson. Quantification of microscopic diffusion anisotropy disentangles effects of orientation dispersion from microstructure: applications in healthy volunteers and in brain tumors. Neuroimage, 104:241–252, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  82. 82.↵
    Elan J Grossman, Ivan I Kirov, Oded Gonen, Dmitry S Novikov, Matthew S Davitz, Yvonne W Lui, Robert I Grossman, Matilde Inglese, and Els Fieremans. N-acetyl-aspartate levels correlate with intra-axonal compartment parameters from diffusion mri. Neuroimage, 118: 334–343, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  83. 83.↵
    Andreana Benitez, Jens H Jensen, Kathryn Thorn, Siddhartha Dhiman, Stephanie Fountain-Zaragoza, William J Rieter, Maria Vittoria Spampinato, Eric D Hamlett, Paul J Nietert, Maria de Fatima Falangola, et al. Greater diffusion restriction in white matter in preclinical alzheimer disease. Annals of Neurology, 91(6):864–877, 2022.
    OpenUrl
  84. 84.↵
    Lianne M Reus, Xueyi Shen, Jude Gibson, Ella Wigmore, Lannie Ligthart, Mark J Adams, Gail Davies, Simon R Cox, Saskia P Hagenaars, Mark E Bastin, et al. Association of polygenic risk for major psychiatric illness with subcortical volumes and white matter integrity in uk biobank. Scientific reports, 7(1):42140, 2017.
    OpenUrl
  85. 85.↵
    Miriam K. Forbes, Bryan Neo, Omid Mohamed Nezami, Eiko I. Fried, Katherine Faure, Brier Michelsen, Maddison Twose, and Mark Dras. Elemental psychopathology: distilling constituent symptoms and patterns of repetition in the diagnostic criteria of the dsm-5. Psych Med, page 1–9, 2023. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723002544.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  86. 86.↵
    Joseph R Phillips, Doaa H Hewedi, Abeer M Eissa, and Ahmed A Moustafa. The cerebellum and psychiatric disorders. Frontiers in public health, page 66, 2015.
  87. 87.↵
    Tabea Schoeler, Doug Speed, Eleonora Porcu, Nicola Pirastu, Jean-Baptiste Pingault, and Zoltán Kutalik. Participation bias in the uk biobank distorts genetic associations and down-stream analyses. Nature Human Behaviour, pages 1–12, 2023.
  88. 88.↵
    Donald M Lyall, Terry Quinn, Laura M Lyall, Joey Ward, Jana J Anderson, Daniel J Smith, William Stewart, Rona J Strawbridge, Mark ES Bailey, and Breda Cullen. Quantifying bias in psychological and physical health in the uk biobank imaging sub-sample. Brain communications, 4(3):fcac119, 2022.
    OpenUrl
  89. 89.↵
    Zhou Wang, Alan C Bovik, Hamid R Sheikh, and Eero P Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE transactions on image processing, 13 (4):600–612, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  90. 90.↵
    Dominique Brunet, Edward R Vrscay, and Zhou Wang. On the mathematical properties of the structural similarity index. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 21(4):1488–1499, 2011.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 20, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Distinct longitudinal brain white matter microstructure changes and associated polygenic risk of common psychiatric disorders and Alzheimer’s disease in the UK Biobank
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Distinct longitudinal brain white matter microstructure changes and associated polygenic risk of common psychiatric disorders and Alzheimer’s disease in the UK Biobank
Max Korbmacher, Dennis van der Meer, Dani Beck, Daniel E. Askeland-Gjerde, Eli Eikefjord, Arvid Lundervold, Ole A. Andreassen, Lars T. Westlye, Ivan I. Maximov
medRxiv 2023.10.19.23297257; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.19.23297257
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Distinct longitudinal brain white matter microstructure changes and associated polygenic risk of common psychiatric disorders and Alzheimer’s disease in the UK Biobank
Max Korbmacher, Dennis van der Meer, Dani Beck, Daniel E. Askeland-Gjerde, Eli Eikefjord, Arvid Lundervold, Ole A. Andreassen, Lars T. Westlye, Ivan I. Maximov
medRxiv 2023.10.19.23297257; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.19.23297257

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)