Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Patient and Clinician Perceptions of a “People-Like-Me” Tool for Personalized Rehabilitation after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Qualitative Interview Study

View ORCID ProfileLaura Churchill, View ORCID ProfileJeremy Graber, Meredith Mealer, View ORCID ProfileCharles A. Thigpen, Dan D. Matlock, Michael J. Bade, Jennifer E. Stevens-Lapsley
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.23.23297404
Laura Churchill
2Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
PT PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laura Churchill
Jeremy Graber
1VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO, USA
2Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
PT PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jeremy Graber
Meredith Mealer
3Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
4Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO, USA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles A. Thigpen
5ATI Physical Therapy, Greenville, South Carolina
PT ATC PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Charles A. Thigpen
Dan D. Matlock
1VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO, USA
2Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
MD MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael J. Bade
1VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO, USA
2Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
PT PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer E. Stevens-Lapsley
1VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO, USA
2Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
PT PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective We developed a decision support tool to help physical therapists (PTs) address the varied expectations and recoveries of the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) population. The tool enables a “people-like-me” approach to rehabilitation, which centers around “using historical outcomes data from similar (past) patients as a template of what to expect for a new patient”. The purpose of this study was to explore patients’ and clinicians’ perceptions and experiences with the tool during rehabilitation after TKA.

Methods We piloted the tool in 2 outpatient physical therapy clinics. We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 1) patients who underwent TKA and were exposed to the tool during rehabilitation and 2) clinicians who used the tool with patients after TKA. Two members of the research team coded the interview data using a descriptive content analysis.

Results 16 patients and 10 clinicians were interviewed. We identified 4 common themes: 1) Expectations: most patients and clinicians felt the tool provided patients with valuable feedback for managing recovery expectations; 2) Motivation: patients and clinicians felt the tool motivated patients to participate in rehabilitation by providing positive reinforcement and/or a form of competition; 3) Influence on practice: some patients and clinicians indicated that the tool helped guide treatment decisions or provided opportunities for patient education, but most felt it did not influence clinical decision making; and 4) Clarity and comprehension: the majority of patients understood the tool’s “take-home” message, however, some patients and clinicians felt the use of percentiles, line graphs, and medical jargon decreased patients’ clarity and comprehension of the tool.

Conclusions Overall, participants reported that the tool helped to shape patients’ expectations for postoperative recovery and increase patient motivation to participate in rehabilitation. Participants had mixed perceptions on how the tool influenced clinical care. Finally, participants identified some limitations in patient comprehension of the tool, which will inform future revisions to the tool to accommodate varying levels of health literacy.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This project was supported by the Agency for Healthcare and Research Quality (AHRQ) R01:HS025692 (Stevens-Lapsley). The funder played no role in the design, conduct, or reporting of this study.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Colorado Multiple Institute Review Board of University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, gave ethical approval for this work

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • - More detailed description of data analysis-Supplemental materials include interview guides

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

  • Abbreviations

    total knee arthroplasty
    (TKA)
    physical therapist
    (PT)
    range of motion
    (ROM)
    Timed Up and Go
    (TUG)
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted June 15, 2024.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Patient and Clinician Perceptions of a “People-Like-Me” Tool for Personalized Rehabilitation after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Qualitative Interview Study
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Patient and Clinician Perceptions of a “People-Like-Me” Tool for Personalized Rehabilitation after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Qualitative Interview Study
    Laura Churchill, Jeremy Graber, Meredith Mealer, Charles A. Thigpen, Dan D. Matlock, Michael J. Bade, Jennifer E. Stevens-Lapsley
    medRxiv 2023.10.23.23297404; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.23.23297404
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Patient and Clinician Perceptions of a “People-Like-Me” Tool for Personalized Rehabilitation after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Qualitative Interview Study
    Laura Churchill, Jeremy Graber, Meredith Mealer, Charles A. Thigpen, Dan D. Matlock, Michael J. Bade, Jennifer E. Stevens-Lapsley
    medRxiv 2023.10.23.23297404; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.23.23297404

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)