Abstract
Research question Can artificial intelligence (AI) improve efficiency and efficacy of sperm searches in azoospermic samples?
Design This two-phase proof-of-concept study beginning with a training phase using 8 azoospermic patients (>10000 sperm images) to provide a variety of surgically collected samples for sperm morphology and debris variation to train a convolutional neural network to identify sperm. Secondly, side-by-side testing on 2 cohorts, an embryologist versus the AI identifying all sperm in still images (cohort 1, N=4, 2660 sperm) and then a side-by-side test with deployment of the AI model on an ICSI microscope and the embryologist performing a search with and without the aid of the AI (cohort 2, N=4, >1300 sperm). Time taken, accuracy and precision of sperm identification was measured.
Results In cohort 1, the AI model showed improvement in time-taken to identify all sperm per field of view (0.019±0.30 x 10-5s versus 36.10±1.18s, P<0.0001) and improved accuracy (91.95±0.81% vs 86.52±1.34%, P<0.001) compared to an embryologist. From a total of 688 sperm in all samples combined, 560 were found by an embryologist and 611 were found by the AI in <1000th of the time. In cohort 2, the AI-aided embryologist took significantly less time per droplet (98.90±3.19s vs 168.7±7.84s, P<0.0001) and found 1396 sperm, while 1274 were found without AI, although no significant difference was observed.
Conclusions AI-powered image analysis has the potential for seamless integration into laboratory workflows, and to reduce time to identify and isolate sperm from surgical sperm samples from hours to minutes, thus increasing success rates from these treatments.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IVFAustralia Research Ethics Committee (Ethics board number EC00346 - study 184) of IVFAustralia gave ethical approval for this work. Ethical approval for healthy sperm samples was received from the University of Technology Sydney ethics review board (ETH19-3677), and for the use of discarded testicular tissue samples from the IVFAustralia Human Research Ethics Committee (DG01192) and UTS ethics review board (ETH22-7189).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
