Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Characterizing Treatment Non-responders vs. Responders in Completed Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Trials

Dulin Wang, Yaobin Ling, Kristofer Harris, Paul E. Schulz, Xiaoqian Jiang, Yejin Kim
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.27.23297685
Dulin Wang
1McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Center at Houston, Houston, TX, U.S
M.S
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yaobin Ling
1McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Center at Houston, Houston, TX, U.S
M.S
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristofer Harris
2Department of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
MPH, RN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul E. Schulz
2Department of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
M.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaoqian Jiang
1McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Center at Houston, Houston, TX, U.S
Ph.D
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yejin Kim
1McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Center at Houston, Houston, TX, U.S
Ph.D
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Yejin.Kim{at}uth.tmc.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients have varying responses to AD drugs and there may be no single treatment for all AD patients. Trial after trial shows that identifying non-responsive and responsive subgroups and their corresponding moderators will provide better insights into subject selection and interpretation in future clinical trials. We aim to extensively investigate pre-treatment features that moderate treatment effect of Galantamine, Bapineuzumab, and Semagacestat from completed trial data. We obtained individual-level patient data from ten randomized clinical trials. Six Galantamine trials and two Bapineuzumab trials were from Yale University Open Data Access Project and two Semagacestat trials were from the Center for Global Clinical Research Data. We included a total of 10,948 subjects. The trials were conducted worldwide from 2001 to 2012. We estimated treatment effect using causal forest modeling on each trial. Finally, we identified important pre-treatment features that determine treatment efficacy and identified responsive or nonresponsive subgroups. As a result, patient’s pre-treatment conditions that determined the treatment efficacy of Galantamine differed by dementia stages, but we consistently observed that non-responders in Galantamine trials had lower BMI (25 vs 28, P < .001) and increased ages (74 vs 68, P < .001). Responders in Bapineuzumab and Semagacestat trials had lower Aβ42levels (6.41 vs 6.53 pg/ml, P < .001) and smaller whole brain volumes (983.13 vs 1052.78 ml, P < .001). 6 ‘positive’ treatment trials had subsets of patients who had, in fact, not responded. 4 “negative” treatment trials had subsets of patients who had, in fact, responded. This study suggests that analyzing heterogeneity in treatment effects in “positive” or “negative” trials may be a very powerful tool for identifying distinct subgroups that are responsive to treatments, which may significantly benefit future clinical trial design and interpretation.

Competing Interest Statement

XJ is CPRIT Scholar in Cancer Research (RR180012), and he was supported in part by Christopher Sarofim Family Professorship, UT Stars award, UTHealth startup, the National Institute of Health (NIH) under award number R01AG066749, R01AG066749-03S1, R01LM013712, R01LM014520, R01AG082721, R01AG066749, U01AG079847, U01TR002062, U01CA274576 and the National Science Foundation (NSF) #2124789. YK is supported in part by UTHealth startup and the National Institute of Health (NIH) under award number R01AG082721 and R01AG066749. PS is funded by the McCord Family Professorship in Neurology, the Umphrey Family Professorship in Neurodegenerative Disorders, multiple NIH grants, several foundation grants, and contracts with multiple pharmaceutical companies related to the performance of clinical trials. He serves as a consultant and speaker for Eli Lilly, Biogen, and Acadia Pharmaceuticals. No other authors have declarations to disclose.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by US NIH (R01AG066749 and U01TR002062); NSF (#2124789), Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RR180012).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 30, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Characterizing Treatment Non-responders vs. Responders in Completed Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Trials
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Characterizing Treatment Non-responders vs. Responders in Completed Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Trials
Dulin Wang, Yaobin Ling, Kristofer Harris, Paul E. Schulz, Xiaoqian Jiang, Yejin Kim
medRxiv 2023.10.27.23297685; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.27.23297685
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Characterizing Treatment Non-responders vs. Responders in Completed Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Trials
Dulin Wang, Yaobin Ling, Kristofer Harris, Paul E. Schulz, Xiaoqian Jiang, Yejin Kim
medRxiv 2023.10.27.23297685; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.27.23297685

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Informatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)