Abstract
Introduction Economic research in the field of pelvic floor rehabilitation is lacking in transparency of methodology and consideration of indirect costs. Service use questionnaires collect cost data with the broad approach needed for the societal perspective of health economic studies. Nevertheless, these questionnaires are seldom validated. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a questionnaire to assess healthcare costs of females with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in Switzerland.
Methods A questionnaire was developed to measure direct medical, direct non-medical and indirect costs in females with stress urinary incontinence living in the larger Bern area in Switzerland. Participants were recruited out of a prior study sample, where they had already completed the cost questionnaire. Administrative databases’ cost data were obtained for the investigation period. The agreement between the reported direct medical costs of the questionnaire with those from the providers’ billings was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient (r), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for agreement, Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (LINCCC) and limits of agreement (LOA).
Results Fourteen participants were eligible for this study. Agreement between the two methods presented a Pearson’s r of 0.64 [95%CI 0.16 to 1.00], ICC of 0.79 [95% CI 0.33 to 0.93] and LINCCC 0.75 [95% CI 0.19 to 0.86]. LOA results showed no evidence for systematically under- or overreporting.
Conclusions The developed questionnaire seemed to be an acceptable representative for direct medical costs in females with stress urinary incontinence in Switzerland. However, direct non-medical and indirect costs were not compared to an external criterion.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Prof. Dr. med. Christian Seiler of "Kantonale Ethikkommission Bern" gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
