Abstract
Background Chronic pain in inflammatory arthritis (IA) reflects a complex interplay between active disease in a peripheral joint and central pro-nociceptive mechanisms. Since intra-articular lidocaine may be used to abolish joint-specific peripheral input to the central nervous system, we aimed to validate its use as a clinical tool to identify those IA patients whose pain likely incorporates centrally mediated mechanisms.
Methods In this two-armed randomised placebo-controlled trial, IA patients requiring an intra-articular steroid injection were 1:1 randomised to additionally receive intra-articular lidocaine or control (0.9% saline). Pain numerical rating scale (NRS) scores were collected at baseline and 3, 5, and 10 minutes post injection. Between group differences in NRS scores at each post-randomisation assessment were estimated using linear mixed-models. Heterogeneity in lidocaine effect was evaluated by baseline painDETECT (grouped ‘high’ (>18) or ‘low’ (≤18)). Analysis in a second cohort validated the painDETECT analysis and included additional markers of centrally mediated pain.
Results The placebo effect of intra-articular injection was low. Post lidocaine injection, those in the high painDETECT group had an NRS score 2.2 points higher than those in the low painDETECT group (p=0.03). In the replication sample, post lidocaine NRS scores were significantly higher in those with a high painDETECT score, fibromyalgia, and low-pressure pain threshold at the trapezius (p=0.002, p=0.001, p=0.005 respectively).
Conclusion Persistent high pain post intra-articular lidocaine injection could potentially be used as an indicator of pro-nociceptive mechanisms that are centrally mediated, informing centrally-targeted analgesic strategies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT05302232
Funding Statement
ZRL (Doctoral Fellowship, NIHR301674) is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) for this research project. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR, NHS or the UK Department of Health and Social Care. FD and LST acknowledge funding from the Wellcome Trust (collaborative award reference 224257/Z/21/Z).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Yorkshire & The Humber-Sheffield research ethics committee (REC reference 22/YH/0051) granted, Bromley research ethics committee and the Health Research Authority (REC 21/LO/0712) granted.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵# S. McMahon passed away during the completion of this study
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
