Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

The implications of using maternity care deserts to measure progress in access to obstetric care: A mixed-integer optimization analysis

Meghan E. Meredith, View ORCID ProfileLauren N. Steimle, View ORCID ProfileStephanie M. Radke
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.31.23297779
Meghan E. Meredith
1H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauren N. Steimle
2H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia, USA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lauren N. Steimle
  • For correspondence: steimle{at}gatech.edu
Stephanie M. Radke
3Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics Iowa City, Iowa, USA
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephanie M. Radke
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Lack of access to risk-appropriate maternity services, particularly for rural residents, is thought to be a leading contributor to disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality. There are several existing measures of access to obstetric care in the literature and popular media. In this study, we explored how current measures of obstetric access inform the number and location of additional obstetric care facilities required to improve access.

Methods We formulated two facility location optimization models to determine the number of new facilities required to minimize the number of reproductive-aged women who lack access to obstetric care. We define regions with a lack of access as either maternity care deserts, designated by the March of Dimes to be counties with no obstetric care facility or obstetric providers, or regions further than 50 miles from critical care obstetric (CCO) services. We gathered information on hospitals with obstetric services from Georgia Department of Public Health public reports and estimated the female reproductive-age population by census block group using the American Community Survey.

Results Out of the 1,910,308 reproductive-aged women who live in Georgia, 104,158 (5.5%) live in maternity care deserts, 150,563 (7.9%) reproductive-aged women live further than 50 miles from CCO services, and 38,202 (2.0%) live in both maternity care desert and further than 50 miles from CCO services. Our optimization analysis suggests that at least 56 new obstetric care facilities (a 67% increase) would be required to eliminate maternity care deserts in Georgia. However, and the expansion of 8 facilities would ensure all women in Georgia live within 50 miles of CCO services.

Conclusions Current measures of access to obstetric care may not be sufficient for evaluating access and planning action toward improvements. In a state like Georgia with a large number of small counties, eliminating maternity care deserts would require a prohibitively large number of new obstetric care facilities. This work suggests that additional measures and tools are needed to estimate the number and type of obstetric care facilities that best match practical resources to meet obstetric care needs.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Research reported in this publication was supported in part by Imagine, Innovate and Impact (I3) from the Emory School of Medicine, Georgia Tech, by the Georgia CTSA NIH award (UL1-TR002378; Steimle) and by the National Science Foundation under grant number DGE-2039655 (Meredith); any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Georgia hospital data is available in public records from Georgia's Department of Public Health from 2017.27 All Georgia block group population counts data are publicly available from the U.S. Census Bureau. Link: https://data.census.gov/all?q=acs&g=040XX00US13$1500000&y=2017. Georgia block group population centroids are publicly available from the U.S. Census Bureau. Link: https://www.census.gov/geographies/reference-files/time-series/geo/centers-population.2010.html#list-tab-ZWAU50627XERV1TT2V. March of Dimes maternity care desert data is available in the March of Dimes report15 and the March of Dimes maternity care deserts dashboard. Link: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/life-sciences-and-health-care/articles/march-of-dimes-maternity-care-deserts-dashboard.html.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Definitions of obstetric deserts clarified. Manuscript editted for clarity.

Data Availability

Code used in the the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. Georgia hospital data is available in public records from Georgia’s Department of Public Health from 2017. (See reference 27) All Georgia block group population counts data are publicly available from the U.S. Census Bureau. Link: https://data.census.gov/all?q=acs&g=040XX00US13$1500000&y=2017. Georgia block group population centroids are publicly available from the U.S. Census Bureau. Link: https://www.census.gov/geographies/reference-files/time-series/geo/centers-population.2010.html#list-tab-ZWAU50627XERV1TT2V. March of Dimes maternity care desert data is available in the March of Dimes report (see reference 15) and the March of Dimes maternity care deserts dashboard. Link: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/life-sciences-and-health-care/articles/march-of-dimes-maternity-care-deserts-dashboard.html.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 29, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The implications of using maternity care deserts to measure progress in access to obstetric care: A mixed-integer optimization analysis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The implications of using maternity care deserts to measure progress in access to obstetric care: A mixed-integer optimization analysis
Meghan E. Meredith, Lauren N. Steimle, Stephanie M. Radke
medRxiv 2023.10.31.23297779; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.31.23297779
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The implications of using maternity care deserts to measure progress in access to obstetric care: A mixed-integer optimization analysis
Meghan E. Meredith, Lauren N. Steimle, Stephanie M. Radke
medRxiv 2023.10.31.23297779; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.31.23297779

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)