Abstract
Background As a result of demographic change, a further increase in the number of people in need of care in Germany can be expected in the future. Nursing activities performed by family members are a central component of care provision. The assumption of support services is increasingly associated with an additional physical and psychological burden on informal caregivers. The aim of this study is to identify and characterize groups of informal caregivers with regard to their well-being.
Methodology The empirical study was based on a survey on home care in Saxony from 2019, which was intended as exploratory work to provide insights into the care situation in Saxony. The central component is a two-step cluster analysis with exclusively informal caregivers.
Results The net sample size for the cluster analysis comprised 178 subjects who were involved in caring for relatives. The cluster analysis revealed two groups of caregiving relatives in Saxony, which were differentiated by a different experience of stress and various sociodemographic factors.
Discussion Informal caregivers in Saxony are not a homogeneous group. Depending on various sociodemographic factors or the care effort and situation, they are confronted with different challenges in caring for relatives, which are directly reflected in their well-being. In order to achieve a targeted reduction in the burden on family caregivers, cooperation and constructive collaboration between political decision-makers, care and health insurers, and the various players in health and care provision is required.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This paper bases on the survey "home care in Saxony" wich was performed in 2019 an co-financed by taxed revenues from the budget that was decides by the parliament of Saxony. Link: https://www.smwk.sachsen.de The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical statement In Germany, health insurance funds may conduct patient surveys to determine the quality of care without the involvement of an ethics committee. This results from paragraph 92 and paragraph 137 of the Social Code Book V (SGB V) in conjunction with paragraph 4 of the Quality Management Guideline for Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (AeQM-RL). In a cover letter on the landing page, the patients were informed about the purpose of the survey; thus, participation in the study was voluntary and anonymous. In order to participate in the survey, the participants had to actively agree to participate after being informed about data protection, etc. The survey was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Declarations:
Funding: This measure is co-financed with tax funds on the basis of the budget passed by the Saxon state parliament.
Ethics approval: Not necessary, as it is not a collection of personal data and the data was collected via the registration offices.
Dataset is available at: Tim Tischendorf. (2023). Dataset - Characterization of groups of informal carers. A cluster analysis. [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8255875
Data Availability
Dataset is available at: Tim Tischendorf. (2023). Dataset - Characterization of groups of informal carers. A cluster analysis. [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8255875
