Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Uromonitor®: Clinical Validation and Performance Assessment of a Urinary Biomarker for Recurrence Surveillance in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients

Pedro Ramos, João Paulo Brás, Carolina Dias, Mafalda Bessa-Gonçalves, Hugo Prazeres, Francisco Botelho, João Silva, Carlos Silva, Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.02.23297958
Pedro Ramos
1Departamento de Urologia, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal
2Instituto de Investigação em Ciências da Vida e Saúde - ICVS/3bs Laboratório Associado, Escola de Medicina, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
João Paulo Brás
3Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
4Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular, Universidade do Porto (Ipatimup), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolina Dias
3Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
4Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular, Universidade do Porto (Ipatimup), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mafalda Bessa-Gonçalves
3Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
4Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular, Universidade do Porto (Ipatimup), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hugo Prazeres
3Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
4Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular, Universidade do Porto (Ipatimup), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francisco Botelho
1Departamento de Urologia, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal
2Instituto de Investigação em Ciências da Vida e Saúde - ICVS/3bs Laboratório Associado, Escola de Medicina, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
João Silva
1Departamento de Urologia, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal
5Departamento de Cirurgia e Fisiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlos Silva
1Departamento de Urologia, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal
5Departamento de Cirurgia e Fisiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo
2Instituto de Investigação em Ciências da Vida e Saúde - ICVS/3bs Laboratório Associado, Escola de Medicina, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal
6Departamento de Urologia, Hospital Privado Braga Sul – Grupo Trofa Saúde, Braga, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: luis.pachecofigueiredo{at}gmail.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Introduction Bladder cancer (BC) remains the most common malignancy of the urinary tract, with non-muscle invasive BC (NMIBC) representing the vast majority of bladder cancer patients. The current standard of care (SOC) follow-up in NMIBC patients demands an intensive schedule and requires costly and burdensome methods, driving the development of alternative, non-invasive, cost-effective methods that may complement or serve as substitutes to cystoscopy and cytology. Uromonitor® is a urine biomarker test that detects hotspot mutations in three genes (TERT, FGFR3, and KRAS) for the evaluation of disease recurrence. The aim of the current study was to assess its performance comparing it to the current SOC methods.

Materials and Methods A total of 528 NMIBC surveillances from 439 individual patients were enrolled from December 2021 to June 2023. All subjects underwent SOC methods and provided an urine sample before undergoing cystoscopy for Uromonitor® analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for recurrence and compared to the gold-standard cystoscopy plus trans-urethral resection (TURBT) pathology.

Results Uromonitor® displayed a sensitivity of 87.2%, with only 6 recurrences failing to be detected by the urinary biomarker test, a specificity of 99.2%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 93.2% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.8%. Cystoscopy showed a total of 22 (31,88%) false positives not confirmed by TURBT, while Uromonitor® presented only 3 positive tests where no suspected lesions were found in cystoscopy. Sensitivity, specificity and NPV values for Uromonitor® also remained high across all NMIBC grades and stages.

Conclusion In the present study, we confirmed that the Uromonitor® biomarker test represents a reliable tool in the detection of NMIBC recurrence in patients undergoing routine surveillance, regardless of stage and grade. It offers either an alternative or a complement to the current SOC methods, providing rapid results and a non-invasive option, potentially improving patients’ quality of life and helping reduce the economic burden of NMIBC follow-up. To our knowledge, this is the largest single-center study assessing Uromonitor®’s performance and thus validating its usefulness in clinical practice.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients participating in the study. Procedures were previously approved by Ethical Review Committee in University Hospital Centre of São João.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • A Table with Descriptive data of the cohort of 439 NMIBC cases was added, As well as a table of Distribution of hotspot mutations identified by Uromonitor.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 15, 2024.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Uromonitor®: Clinical Validation and Performance Assessment of a Urinary Biomarker for Recurrence Surveillance in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Uromonitor®: Clinical Validation and Performance Assessment of a Urinary Biomarker for Recurrence Surveillance in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients
Pedro Ramos, João Paulo Brás, Carolina Dias, Mafalda Bessa-Gonçalves, Hugo Prazeres, Francisco Botelho, João Silva, Carlos Silva, Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo
medRxiv 2023.11.02.23297958; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.02.23297958
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Uromonitor®: Clinical Validation and Performance Assessment of a Urinary Biomarker for Recurrence Surveillance in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients
Pedro Ramos, João Paulo Brás, Carolina Dias, Mafalda Bessa-Gonçalves, Hugo Prazeres, Francisco Botelho, João Silva, Carlos Silva, Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo
medRxiv 2023.11.02.23297958; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.02.23297958

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Urology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)