Abstract
Background Although predominantly preventable and treatable, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of death globally. Guidelines for managing the condition are widely available, yet COPD care remains suboptimal in many settings, including high and middle-income countries (HICs and MICs). Several approaches are used to diagnose and manage COPD, resulting in substantial variation in its care pathways. This study aimed to explore how barriers to optimal COPD care vary across HICs and MICs by identifying common and unique barriers to COPD care in six countries to inform global policy initiatives for better care while addressing specific challenges.
Methods Based on international and national guidelines, we mapped COPD care pathways for Australia, Spain, Taiwan, Argentina, Mexico, and Russia. Country-specific pathways were populated with published epidemiological, health economic, and clinical data identified through a pragmatic literature review. Semi-structured interviews with 17 respiratory care clinicians further informed and validated the pathways, data inputs, and key issues arising in each country. Thematic content analysis was used to analyse common and unique barriers across countries.
Results Six themes were common in most HICs and MICs: “Challenges in COPD diagnosis”, “Strengthening the role of primary care”, “Fragmented healthcare systems and coordination challenges”, “Inadequate management of COPD exacerbations”; “Limited access to specialised care” and, “Impact of underfinanced and overloaded healthcare systems”. One theme, “Insurance coverage and reimbursement challenges”, was more relevant for MICs.
HICs and MICs differ in patient and healthcare provider awareness, primary care involvement, spirometry access, and specialised care availability. Both face issues with healthcare fragmentation, guideline adherence, and COPD exacerbation management. MICs also grapple with resource limitations and healthcare infrastructure challenges.
Conclusion Many challenges to COPD care are the same in both HICs and MICs, underscoring the pervasive nature of these issues. While country-specific issues require customised solutions, there are untapped possibilities for implementing global respiratory strategies that motivate countries to manage COPD effectively. In addition to healthcare system-level initiatives, there is a crucial need for political prioritisation of COPD to secure the essential resources it requires.
Competing Interest Statement
OS, AM, KPS, RGA, and EA worked at Aquarius Population Health at the time of the project. Aquarius Population Health receives consultancy and research fees from other pharmaceutical and MedTech companies unrelated to this work. Abelardo Elizondo Rios has served on boards for trials sponsored by AstraZeneca, Bayern, Novartis and GSK. Alexis Cazaux has no conflict of interest in relation to the topic of this research. Outside of the submitted work, Sergey Avdeev reports receiving consulting fees and/or fees for attending lectures, meetings and conferences and/or travel expenses and/or research grants from AstraZeneca, Novartis, GSK, Teva, Sanofi, and Chiesi. Peter Wark has no conflict of interest in relation to the topic of this research.
Funding Statement
Aquarius Population Health was funded by AstraZeneca to carry out this research. The study design, data gathering, data analysis, results and interpretation were carried out independently by the authors. AstraZeneca reviewed the manuscript once for medical and scientific accuracy. The authors confirm they had full access to all the data in this study and take complete responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the analysis.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics review was not required for this study as no individual level data was used.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are confidential and cannot be shared; a selection on anonymised data are available in the manuscript.
