The effects of inhaled corticosteroids on healthy airways

INTRODUCTION

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the cornerstone of asthma treatment. They attenuate eosinophilic airway inflammation(1,2), improve lung function, and reduce asthma symptoms, exacerbations, and mortality(3). However, their use is also associated with an increased risk of pneumonia(4). Corticosteroids modulate the expression of many molecular pathways at the level of gene transcription, through direct upregulation of anti-inflammatory molecules and β-adrenoceptors (transactivation), and suppression of pro-inflammatory genes, either through direct DNA-binding or via inhibition of pro-inflammatory transcription factor binding (transrepression)(5). In people with severe asthma, ICS are relatively ineffective even at high doses, but the mechanisms behind this corticosteroid insensitivity are poorly understood and likely multi-factorial(6,7).

When considering the underlying molecular pathways driving both severe asthma and relative corticosteroid insensitivity, it is unclear to what extent this is driven by pathways that are not responsive to corticosteroids, as opposed to inhibition of corticosteroid signalling. Gene expression profiling in asthmatic epithelial bronchial brushings and bronchial biopsies has identified several molecular pathways present in subgroups of patients with mild, moderate and severe asthma(8,9). Approximately 80% of people with steroid-naïve “mild” asthma demonstrate evidence of blood or airway eosinophilia, with a concomitant increase in the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO)(10,11). This phenotype is characterised by increased expression of an airway gene expression signature driven by IL-4 and IL-13(8,9,12,13); tissue eosinophilia is also dependent on IL-5(14). Together these cytokines are described as Th2 or type-2 cytokines (T2). T2 expression and the accompanying eosinophilia are suppressed by ICS in mild asthma(15). In severe asthma, a persistent T2 gene signature is evident in about 25% of patients, suggesting corticosteroid insensitivity(8,9). In addition, in severe asthma, about 25% of patients have evidence of an IL-17-dependent gene signature, which is seen only in people on ICS(8,9), and mutually exclusive with the T2 signature. It is therefore not clear whether this IL-17 activity represents an independent corticosteroid-insensitive pathway driving severe asthma or a consequence of ICS therapy. Approximately 50% of people with severe asthma have neither a T2- or IL-17-dependent airway gene signature, and the mechanisms driving their persistent disordered airway physiology remains unknown. So, while gene expression profiling provides insight into the abnormalities present in severe asthmatic airways, the multiple effects of ICS on airway gene expression make it difficult to disentangle the changes due to the disease as opposed to the treatment, and whether corticosteroid activity is inhibited or not.

The effects of ICS on healthy airways are poorly defined. We hypothesise that gene expression data in severe asthma will be more interpretable if we can delineate and thus allow for the effects of high dose ICS therapy. We have therefore performed a randomised open label bronchoscopy study of high dose ICS therapy in healthy adult volunteers, with the aim of understanding transcriptional consequences of ICS therapy without the confounding effects due to disease-related processes.

METHODS

Detailed methods are provided in the online data supplement.

This prospective study was approved by the East Midlands-Leicester Central Research Ethics Committee (reference:15/EM/0313) and registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02476825). Participants gave written informed consent.

RESULTS

Effects of ICS on airway inflammatory and structural cells

Suitable paired samples for immunohistochemical analysis of the lamina propria were available from 17 participants receiving ICS and 8 undergoing observation (Figure 1 and Supplementary Figure E2). Although there was no significant change in lamina propria eosinophil counts within either group from the 1^st to 2^nd bronchoscopy, there was a significant between-group difference in the changes (p=0.01), due to a non-significant increase in the observation group (Figure 1A). There was no correlation between the change in blood eosinophils versus tissue eosinophils in the observation group (r_s= −0.024, p=0.97). Comparing the changes in measurements from the 1^st to 2^nd bronchoscopy for the ICS versus the observation group, there were no significant differences between treatment groups for lamina propria neutrophil, tryptase+ or chymase+ mast cell counts, airway smooth muscle (ASM) and epithelial area expressed as a percentage of biopsy area, or reticular basement membrane depth (Figure 1B-G)(Supplementary Figure E2).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1

Immunohistochemical analysis of the lamina propria biopsies showing cell counts and remodelling features on participants with available paired data, before and after 4 weeks treatment with inhaled fluticasone or without treatment. The change in numbers of A) eosinophils, with atopic participants shown in red, B) tryptase-positive mast cells, C) chymase-positive mast cells, or D) neutrophils, expressed in absolute counts/mm². Changes in area of E) epithelium or F) airway smooth muscle (ASM), expressed as a percentage of biopsy area or of G) reticular basement membrane (RBM) thickness. Horizontal bars represent mean (SD)(mast cells, neutrophils, ASM, epithelium, RBM) or median (IQR) (eosinophils), analysed by unpaired t test or Mann Whitney U respectively.

Effects of ICS on airway gene expression

Suitable paired brush and biopsy samples were available for 15 and 20 participants respectively receiving ICS. We observed significant differential expression of genes amongst participants at week 4 compared with baseline in the ICS-treatment group, with upregulation of 72 genes in brushings and 53 genes in biopsies, and downregulation of 82 genes in brushings and 416 genes in biopsies (Figure 2, Supplementary Tables E1-E4, Supplementary Figures E3, E4). Amongst participants in the observation-only group there were no significant changes in gene expression observed between baseline and week 4 (Supplementary Figure E5). There was a close correlation between epithelial brush and bronchial biopsy gene expression, with 20 genes common to the top 24 most significantly differentially upregulated genes in both airway compartments (Table 2) and 20 genes common to the top 41 most significantly downregulated genes in both compartments (Table 3).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2

Changes in gene expression measured by RNAseq in response to 4 weeks treatment with inhaled fluticasone. A) Bronchial brush volcano plot. B) Bronchial biopsy volcano plot.

View this table:

• View inline
• View popup
• Download powerpoint

Table 2 Top upregulated differentially expressed genes

View this table:

• View inline
• View popup
• Download powerpoint

Table 3 Top downregulated differentially expressed genes

The most significantly upregulated genes were predominantly those involved in steroid metabolism (HSD11B2, FKBP5, SULT2B1, SYT8, and SLCO1B3), cellular proliferation (PSCA, TFCP2L1, IFITM10, ANPEP), cellular metabolism (GRAMD2A, PRODH, GNMT) and cytoskeletal changes (PHACTR3, FAM107A). By contrast genes which were most significantly downregulated in both brushings and biopsies were key components of T2-driven inflammation (FCER1A, CPA3, IL33, CLEC10A, SERPINB10 and CCR5) and T cell-mediated adaptive immunity (TARP, TRBC1, TRBC2, PTPN22, TRAC, CD2, CD8A, HLA-DQB2, CD96, PTPN7) and (Table 3). All other top 20 common downregulated genes were involved with innate or adaptive immunity, including the transcription factor Hobit (ZNF683) which promotes lymphocyte tissue residency, the chemokine RANTES (CCL5), the antigen presentation-associated molecule Langerin (CD207), and the growth factor GFI1 which is involved in haematopoiesis, especially of neutrophils. In addition, there was downregulation of genes associated with B cell function and immumunoglobulin production (CD20/79, most heavy and variable light chains for IgA, IgG and IgM, JCHAIN), protective innate immunity (e.g. CD48, CD163), mast cell proteases (TPSB1, TPSAB1, CPA3), the beta chain of the high affinity IgE receptor (MS4A2), and prostaglandin D2 synthase (PTGDS1).

Consistent with these findings, pathway analysis of bronchial brushings with Reactome showed strong ICS-related downregulation of innate and adaptive pathways, including ‘Immunoregulatory interactions between a lymphoid and non-lymphoid cell’, five pathways related to TCR signaling, the immunological synapse or co-stimulation, with weaker signals for ‘Generation of second messenger molecules’, ‘PD-1 signaling’, and ‘Chemokine receptors bind chemokines’, showing the potent ability of ICS to suppress local adaptive T cell immunity (Supplementary Figures E6, Supplementary Table E5). Parallel analysis of the bronchial biopsies again showed effects on lymphoid – non-lymphoid interactions and TCR signaling, but also strong suppression of ‘Extracellular matrix organization’, ‘Cell surface interactions at the vascular wall’ and ‘Integrin cell surface interactions’, suggesting the potential for suppression of inflammatory cell recruitment to the mucosa (Supplementary Figure E7, Supplementary Table E6). ICS did not upregulate the IL-17-dependent gene signature identified previously in people with moderate-severe asthma (Supplementary Fig.E8)

Next we compared our set of differentially upregulated genes with a set of 26 genes previously reported as induced by 10 weeks of inhaled fluticasone in bronchial brushings from participants with mild asthma(19). Geneset enrichment analysis profiles showed very close agreement between genesets (Supplementary Figure E9), particularly for brushings, which were directly comparable between studies, showing very similar ICS-induced gene induction in health and mild asthma.

DISCUSSION

In this open label, randomised study in healthy adult volunteers, we have defined genes that are altered directly by medium-term (4 weeks), twice daily high-dose ICS therapy independent of the confounding effect of asthma pathophysiology. Changes in airway cellularity were minimal between ICS treatment and no treatment, and there were no measurable biologically significant effects on the airway microbiome or DNA methylation.

By contrast, we observed widespread changes in gene expression following ICS use in these healthy individuals, which predominantly comprised downregulated genes. A striking finding was that the most significantly downregulated genes statistically were canonical markers of T2-driven inflammation. Notably the most highly downregulated gene, in both airway brushes, which predominantly sample the airway epithelium, and mucosal biopsies, was FCER1A which encodes the α chain of the high affinity IgE receptor, a key effector component of mast cell activation by allergens and of T2 immunity, which is highly upregulated in asthma (20,21). In addition, there was downregulation of genes encoding mast cell tryptases (TPSB1, TPSAB1) and carboxypeptidase A3 (CPA3), the beta chain of the high affinity IgE receptor (MS4A2), and prostaglandin D2 synthase (PTGDS1). We did not see a reduction in mast cell numbers in the airway mucosa of these healthy individuals, so the predominant effect of ICS appears to be on gene transcription, rather than mast cell survival, but nevertheless suggests that ICS have a potentially important dampening effect on mast cell function. In biopsies, there was also downregulation of the important mast cell chemoattractants CXCL10 and CXCL11 which promote mast cell migration to the ASM in mild steroid-naive asthma through the airway mast cell chemokine receptor CXCR3(22). In people with severe asthma using high dose ICS +/− oral corticosteroids, mast cells are not increased within the ASM (23,24), suggesting suppression of mast cell chemoattractants from ASM may remain corticosteroid-sensitive in severe disease. This is in contrast to the release of mast cell-derived proteases and autacoids which demonstrate ongoing release in severe disease(23,25).

Other highly downregulated T2-related genes included IL33, an airway epithelial cell alarmin which acts to promote initiation of T2 responses(26), CLEC10A which is a marker for alternatively activated macrophages(27), SERPINB10 which is highly upregulated on airway epithelium by IL-13 and inhibits Th2 cell apoptosis, and CCR5 whose ligands include CCL5 (RANTES), a chemoattractant for eosinophils and mast cells. Moreover PTGS1, which encodes cyclooxygenase-1 was the 7^th most downregulated gene in brushings. This enzyme converts arachidonate to prostaglandins and its dysregulation or inhibition is implicated in salicylate-sensitive asthma and sino-nasal eosinophilic inflammation(28). Similarly in biopsies, periostin (POSTN), an IL-13-induced epithelial gene associated with T2 high asthma(29), was also downregulated.

Taken together, the ability of ICS to downregulate this extensive set of T2-related genes implies that homeostasis in health involves a low level of tonic T2 signalling in the airway mucosa that is very sensitive to ICS. This would be consistent with the observation that IL-4- and IL-5-positive cells are present in healthy airways(30), as are mast cells and dendritic cells expressing FcεRIα(31). Constitutive T2 signalling is also evident in primary epithelial cell cultures grown at air-liquid interface, where we previously observed that STAT6-dependent genes including POSTN, CLCA1 and SERPINB2 were repressed by NFκΒ-dependent cytokine stimulation or dexamethasone(32). Thus differentiated bronchial epithelial cells have a low level of tonic STAT6 dependent signalling in the absence of exogenous IL-4 or IL-13. However, FeNO was not reduced by ICS in these healthy volunteers, and NOS2, which regulates FeNO production, was not altered by ICS therapy, suggesting tonic T2 signalling is below the threshold required for pathological FeNO generation.

The role of low-level, tonic, constitutive T2 signalling in the airways is uncertain but likely beneficial for tissue homeostasis. T2 immunity exhibits many host-protective functions, including maintaining metabolic homeostasis, suppressing excessive T1 inflammation, maintenance of barrier defence and regulation of tissue regeneration(33–36). For example, IL-33 is pleiotropic and can promote type 2 inflammation but in other contexts it can be immunoregulatory(26), and preserves epithelial integrity during influenza infection in a mouse model(37,38). Thus the effects of type 2 immunity may be context specific and affected by the cellular source and concomitant inflammatory milieu, and at steady state may promote airway epithelial barrier function. Inhibition of homeostatic tonic T2 signalling might therefore have deleterious effects which may have an impact clinically, and might explain an enhanced propensity to proteobacterial colonisation or infection, as was observed in the MEX(39) and RASP-UK(40) studies amongst participants with very low T2 biomarkers.

In addition to the inhibition of T2-driven genes, there was marked suppression of molecules involved in both protective innate immunity (e.g. CD48, CEACAM5) and adaptive immunity, with suppression of genes related to dendritic cells (CD207), T cells (e.g. CD2/3/6/8/96, TRBC1/2, TRAC), and B cell function (e,g, CD20/79, most heavy and variable light chains for IgA, IgG and IgM, JCHAIN). This potential impairment of innate, cell-mediated and antibody-dependent immunity likely explains the reproducible dose-dependent increased pneumonia risk in people with asthma and COPD who are using ICS(4). A subgroup of people with asthma also become colonised with certain fungi(41), and it is possible that this is also a consequence of the mucosal immunosuppression observed here.

An important aim of this study was to provide information on the activity of ICS in healthy airways, to remove the confounding that might occur due to disease-related changes in gene expression or inherent ICS responsiveness, which should facilitate analyses of gene expression changes in asthma. Studies of severe asthma to-date (42) have attempted to account for the effects of ICS based on gene expression changes derived from in vitro cell cultures, from an interventional study of gene expression changes in people administered ICS for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and from one previous intervention study which used microarrays to assess acute airway transcriptional consequences 6 hours after a single inhaled dose of budesonide (1600 µg) in 12 healthy, steroid-naïve men(43). Our findings are complementary to the previous budesonide study in that some differentially regulated genes are common to our two studies (including upregulation of FKBP5, ZBTB16, PHACTR3, TSC22D3 and downregulation of CD207, FCER1A, IL33), but there is a striking difference in the overall consequences of a single dose versus 4 weeks twice daily ICS use. The predominant effect of a single large acute dose of ICS was upregulation of genes (transactivation), with 68 genes upregulated and only 28 downregulated. Many of the upregulated genes were proinflammatory including growth factors, chemokines, chemokine receptors, cytokines, growth factors, and coagulation factors. By comparison in our chronic high dose exposure study only 53 genes were upregulated in biopsies, whilst 416 genes were downregulated (transrepression). This highlights the critical and often overlooked importance of the complex temporal dynamics of corticosteroid effects. Early during an acute infectious or traumatic challenge a surge in endogenous corticosteroids will tend to enhance protective inflammatory and procoagulant responses, but as time passes these responses will attenuate and slower but potent transrepressive effects will dominate to curtail uncontrolled inflammatory cell recruitment and activation, to prevent bystander tissue damage, and to direct resolution of tissue homeostasis. It is this latter situation which is of greatest clinical relevance to long term asthma management. Of note, comparing our data to the study by Woodruff(12), where people with mild asthma received inhaled placebo or fluticasone propionate (500 µg) twice daily for 8 weeks, there was a strong correlation between the studies for ICS-inducible genes, suggesting that in mild asthma at least, ICS-dependent transactivation is preserved.

When considering previous studies of gene expression in severe asthma, an IL-17-dependent gene signature is expressed in a subset of people, and mutually exclusive with a T2 gene signature(8,9). This IL-17-dependent signature was only seen in people using ICS, but it has been unclear whether this is disease- or treatment-related, and whether it is harmful or potentially protective. We did not see upregulation of this IL-17 signature after 4 weeks of ICS treatment in this study, thus it seems most likely a feature of disease. Similarly, there is upregulation of CEACAM family members in severe asthma, notably the IL-13-dependent gene CEACAM5(44,45), and CEACAM6 which was increased on both the epithelium and neutrophils in bronchial biopsies(44). Here we found that CEACAM6 expression did not change with ICS treatment, while CEACAM5 expression was reduced (tables E2, E4), in keeping with the inhibition of other T2-related genes. Therefore the upregulation of these CEACAMs in severe asthma appears to be a feature of the disease rather than treatment. In the recent U-BIOPRED bronchoscopy study(24), ICS-inducible genes such as FKBP5 were upregulated in severe asthma, suggesting that their participants were adherent to treatment, and importantly, that ICS transactivation appears to be preserved in severe asthma, but many pathological pathways that should be sensitive to transrepression by ICS such as T2 signalling are not responsive in a subset of patients(8,9,23).

There are some limitations to our work. Firstly the effects of ICS in healthy airways at 4 weeks, while likely representative of the steady state in long term therapy, might not be fully representative of longer term therapy. However it is not reasonable to ask healthy volunteers to take ICS for a year, and adherence would likely wane. Secondly our analyses use bulk sequencing of airway brushes and biopsies, and ICS effects are likely to be highly cell-specific, so future studies using spatial sequencing, from central and peripheral airways as well as nasal tissues and peripheral blood would be informative. For example, as we did not enumerate all of the cell types implicated in the transcriptomic analyses, we cannot conclude whether the changes in T- and B-lymphocyte related gene expression are due to transcriptional changes within lymphocytes, changes in the relative proportions of lymphocytes in the samples, or a combination of the two.

In summary, we defined genes altered directly by ICS therapy without confounding by disease. We provide evidence that IL-17-dependent signalling in asthma is disease-dependent rather than ICS-dependent, and demonstrate downregulation of canonical markers of T2 inflammation, implying that homeostasis in health involves tonic T2 signalling in the airway mucosa, which is exquisitely sensitive to ICS. There was also broad suppression of innate and adaptive immunity, in keeping with known immunosuppressive effects of corticosteroids.

Funding sources

This work was supported by an investigator-led grant from Genentech to the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, and supported in part by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory). EM is supported by Asthma+Lung UK (WADR22\100015). TSCH is supported by a Wellcome Trust Fellowship (211050/Z/18/z). RLC is supported by a University of Nottingham Anne McLaren Fellowship. All authors had full access to the data in the study and accept responsibility to submit for publication. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

Author contributions

All authors reviewed the data and contributed to its interpretation, edited the manuscript, and approved the final submitted version.