Abstract
Objectives A routine nursing task is providing explanations to patients, their families, and other healthcare professionals. Inaccurate explanations can adversely affect the quality of healthcare and patient safety. Despite the significance of good explanatory skills in nursing, supporting empirical data are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a psychological scale and investigate the impact of explanatory skills on incidents.
Methods In the preliminary investigation, responses obtained from experienced nurses were analyzed to compile 87 scale items. Study 1 involved an online explanatory skills survey with a sample of 1,000 nursing professionals. Study 2 comprised a field survey involving 159 nursing staff members working in a comprehensive hospital.
Results Nine sub-skills were identified and categorized under two factors: “compassion” and “mental model sharing.” Seven of these sub-skills were found to be shared, and the remaining two were specific to interactions with patients/families or healthcare professionals. Clinical ladder progression was associated with both compassion and mental model sharing, whereas years of practical experience was only related to mental model sharing. Furthermore, compassion was identified as a factor that increased the probability of the occurrence of various incidents through interactional failures. In contrast, mental model sharing enhanced the probability of severe incidents stemming from judgmental failures and minor incidents from conceptual failures.
Conclusions This study developed a psychological scale to measure nursing professionals’ explanation skills in communication with patients, their families, and other medical staff. It elucidated their impact on incident occurrence through miscommunication. The findings need to be practically verified through fieldwork in nursing education.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP 18K10180
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This research was conducted following established ethical guidelines and received approval from Human Research Ethics Committee of Ritsumeikan University.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The authors have no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this article. This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP 18K10180. The authors have no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years, and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Changed the format of the abstract and in-text citation numbers to change the submission address and added acknowledgments.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
