ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION Medical education scholarship often lacks a strong theoretical underpinning, with this gap most often affecting early-career researchers and researchers in the Global South. Large language models (LLMs) have shown considerable promise to augment human writing and creativity in a variety of settings. In this study, we describe the development of MedEdMENTOR — an online platform for medical education research with a library of over 250 theories — and the development and evaluation of MedEdMENTOR AI, an LLM containing knowledge from MedEdMENTOR and the first AI mentor for medical education research.
METHODS From a postpositivist paradigm, we evaluated MedEdMENTOR AI by testing it against 6 months of qualitative research published in 24 core medical educational journals. In a blinded fashion, we presented MedEdMENTOR AI with only the phenomenon of the qualitative study, and asked it to recommend 5 theories that could be used to study that phenomenon.
RESULTS For 55% (29 of 53) of studies, MedEdMENTOR AI recommended the actual theoretical constructs chosen in the respective qualitative studies.
CONCLUSIONS Our data is preliminary, but it suggests that MedEdMENTOR AI and other LLMs can be highly effective in guiding medical education scholars towards theories that may be applicable in their research. Further research is needed to assess performance on other tasks in medical education research.
Competing Interest Statement
Dr. Ow and Dr. Stetson are co-founders of MedEdMENTOR. Dr. Stetson has received grant funding from the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation to study MedEdMENTOR and its impact. Dr. Rodman has received grant funding from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation.
Funding Statement
This study did not directly utilize any funding. However, Dr. Stetson has received grant funding from the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation to study MedEdMENTOR and its impact. Dr. Rodman has received grant funding from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
