Abstract
Background Balance impairments commonly occur in patients after stroke. Research is warranted to improve the efficiency of rehabilitation by combining core stabilization training, such as trunk exercises, and real-time feedback. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of real-time feedback-based core stabilization training (RFCST) using a sling on the dynamic balance and gait of patients with stroke.
Methods Thirty-eight patients with stroke were randomly assigned to either RFCST using a sling group (n= 19) or a control group (n= 19). Each group was trained for 30 min daily, 3 times a week for 4 weeks. The Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS), Functional Reach Test (FRT), Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and gait parameters were assessed using the GAITRite system before and after the intervention.
Results The results showed a significant interaction between Group*Time effect F(1, 36)= 36.068, p<0.001, η²p= 0.5 in TIS; F(1, 36)= 63.890, p<0.001, η²p= 0.640 in FRT; F(1, 36)= 89.283, p<0.001, η²p= 0.713 in PASS, F(1, 36)= 150.893, p<0.001, η²p= 0.807 in TUG; F(1, 36)= 27.275, p<0.001, η²p= 0.431 in gait velocity; F(1, 36)= 54.401, p<0.001, η²p= 0.447 in cadence; F(1, 36)= 5.601, p=0.023, η²p= 0.135 in step length; F(1, 36)= 22.559, p<0.001, η²p = 0.385 in stride length; F(1, 36)= 15.516, p<0.001, η²p = 0.301 in swing phase rate; and F(1, 36)= 28.451, p<0.001, η²p = 0.441 in stance phase rate.
Conclusion Based on these results, it can be concluded that RFCST using a sling can improve dynamic balance and gait parameters in patients with stroke.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
The protocol of this trial was retrospectively registered in the Clinical Research Information Service of Korea (KCT0006552).
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was conducted by the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Sahmyook University in Korea (SYUIRB2-1040781-A-N-012021059HR).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
