ABSTRACT
Objectives Substance use disorder has been associated with increased morbidity in COVID-19 infection. However, less is known about the impact of active substance use and medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) on COVID-19 outcomes. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the impact of substance use, namely cannabis, cocaine, alcohol, sedative and opioid use as well as buprenorphine or methadone = on COVID-19 morbidity and mortality.
Methods Using electronic-health record data at a large urban hospital system, patients who tested positive for COVID-19 between January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021 were included. Substance use was identified from urine toxicology and MOUD prescriptions within 90 days prior to admission. COVID-19 outcomes included mortality, ICU admission, need for ventilatory support, number and duration of hospitalizations. Multivariable logistic regression was performed controlling for variables such as age, sex, medical comorbidity, tobacco use, and social disadvantage.
Results Among COVID-19 positive patients (n=17,423), sedative, cannabis, cocaine, and opioid use was associated with statistically significant increases in need for ICU care, need for ventilatory support, number of hospitalizations and duration of hospitalization. Substance use was not associated with an increase in all-cause mortality. There were no statistically significant differences between methadone, buprenorphine and other opioids on COVID-19 outcomes.
Conclusions Active substance use were associated with increased morbidity in COVID-19 infection. MOUD was not associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes compared to OUD. Future studies focused on MOUD treatments that reduce morbidity may help improve clinical outcomes in COVID-19.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Nicholaus Christian's effort was sponsored by HSR&D post-doctoral fellowship through the VA Office of Academic Affairs. Rajiv Radhakrishnan's effort was supported by NIDA grant (R21DA057540).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved for exemption of full-review and waiver of written informed consent by Yale University Institutional Review Board (IRB).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding/sources of support: none
Conflicts of interest: none
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
