Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

The effects of community treatment orders (CTOs) on readmission to hospital using electronic health records

View ORCID ProfileJustin C Yang, View ORCID ProfileJohan H Thygesen, Nomi Werbeloff, David Kelsey, Dominique Merlande, View ORCID ProfileJoseph Hayes, View ORCID ProfileDavid PJ Osborn
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.27.23298057
Justin C Yang
1Division of Psychiatry, University College London
2Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Justin C Yang
  • For correspondence: justin.yang{at}ucl.ac.uk
Johan H Thygesen
1Division of Psychiatry, University College London
2Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust
3Institute of Health Informatics, University College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Johan H Thygesen
Nomi Werbeloff
4The Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar-Ilan University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Kelsey
2Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust
5Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dominique Merlande
2Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust
6East London NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph Hayes
1Division of Psychiatry, University College London
2Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joseph Hayes
David PJ Osborn
1Division of Psychiatry, University College London
2Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David PJ Osborn
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Community treatment orders (CTOs) are used to manage community-based care for individuals with severe mental health conditions who have been discharged from inpatient care. Evidence examining whether CTOs are successful at reducing rehospitalisation has been mixed.

Methods Using deidentified electronic health records from 2009-21, we compared patients who had ever been placed on a CTO (n=836) and two other groups of patients who had never been placed on CTO: patients admitted under Section 3 of the Mental Health Act (n=1,182) and outpatients with severe mental health issues (n=7,651). We examined the association between CTOs and rehospitalisation using within-individual stratified multivariable Cox regression.

Results Patients on CTO were more likely to be male, single, of Black or Mixed ethnicity, and have a severe mental illness diagnosis than patients in the comparison groups. Time spent on CTO was associated with a lower risk of hospitalisation compared to time spent off CTO for the same individual (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.56-0.64). This decreased risk of hospitalisation remained when we restricted analysis to individuals with a single CTO episode (HR 0.05; 95% CI 0.02-0.11) and when we restricted follow-up time to a patient’s first CTO episode (HR 0.20; 95% CI 0.17-0.25). However, there was no difference in re-hospitalisations when we observed patients starting from the first CTO (HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.00-1.16).

Conclusions We found that patients on CTO were at lower risk of hospitalisation, though this pattern was not observed when we excluded time prior to the first CTO. Further research should consider whether CTOs provide genuine clinical benefit.

Competing Interest Statement

JCY, JHT, NWB, DK, DM, and DPJO have no conflicts to disclose. JFH has received consultancy fees from Wellcome Trust and juli Health.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (MR/W014386/1). David P.J. Osborn is also supported by the University College London Hospitals NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and the NIHR North Thames Applied Research Collaboration. Joseph F. Hayes is supported by UKRI grant MR/V023373/1, the University College London Hospitals NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and the NIHR North Thames Applied Research Collaboration. The funder had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical approval for use of the C&I CRIS database was obtained from the East of England - Cambridge Central Research Ethics Committee (19/EE/0210) and the project was approved by the C&I Research Oversight Committee.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Authorship Statement JCY: Conception or design of the work; data collection; data analysis and interpretation; drafting the article, final approval of the version to be published, JHT: Conception or design of the work; initial data analysis, drafting the article; critical revision of the article; final approval of the version to be published, NW: Critical revision of the article; final approval of the version to be published DK: Critical revision of the article; final approval of the version to be published DM: Critical revision of the article; final approval of the version to be published, JH: Data analysis and interpretation; critical revision of the article; final approval of the version to be published, DPJO: Critical revision of the article; final approval of the version to be published

  • Funding This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (MR/W014386/1). David P.J. Osborn is also supported by the University College London Hospitals NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and the NIHR North Thames Applied Research Collaboration. Joseph F. Hayes is supported by UKRI grant MR/V023373/1, the University College London Hospitals NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and the NIHR North Thames Applied Research Collaboration. The funder had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care.

  • Declaration of Conflicts JCY, JHT, NWB, DK, DM, and DPJO have no conflicts to disclose. JFH has received consultancy fees from Wellcome Trust and juli Health.

  • Data Availability The data that support the findings of this study are available to approved researchers through Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust. The data are not publicly available due to restrictions on data access by the Data Controller in the interest of patient confidentiality.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available to approved researchers through Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust. The data are not publicly available due to restrictions on data access by the Data Controller in the interest of patient confidentiality.

https://www.candi.nhs.uk/health-professionals/research/ci-research-database

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 27, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The effects of community treatment orders (CTOs) on readmission to hospital using electronic health records
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The effects of community treatment orders (CTOs) on readmission to hospital using electronic health records
Justin C Yang, Johan H Thygesen, Nomi Werbeloff, David Kelsey, Dominique Merlande, Joseph Hayes, David PJ Osborn
medRxiv 2023.11.27.23298057; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.27.23298057
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The effects of community treatment orders (CTOs) on readmission to hospital using electronic health records
Justin C Yang, Johan H Thygesen, Nomi Werbeloff, David Kelsey, Dominique Merlande, Joseph Hayes, David PJ Osborn
medRxiv 2023.11.27.23298057; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.27.23298057

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)