Summary
This study evaluates the efficacy of GPT-4 in screening for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) in the elderly, comparing it with junior neurologists. MCI is a precursor to dementia, presenting a significant public health concern due to the rising global aging population. With over 55 million people affected by dementia worldwide, early detection is essential for timely intervention. Common screening tools, while effective, are resource-intensive, highlighting the need for more efficient methods. The study used an exploratory design with 174 participants, comparing the performance of GPT-4 against three junior neurologists. The GPT-4 model was trained using a set of language analysis indicators to evaluate the severity of MCI. Participants’ test texts and voices were grouped and independently assessed by the neurologists and the GPT-4 model. The neurologists and the GPT-4 model independently assessed the participants’ test corpus. The neurologists assessed both the text and voice of the test, while the GPT model assessed the text only. Results showed that the GPT-4 model had higher accuracy (0.81) compared to the neurologists (ranging from 0.41 to 0.49). GPT-4 demonstrated better discrimination of MCI with significant statistical difference (p < 0.001). The study also developed a clinical risk assessment nomogram based on the top ten weighted features from GPT-4’s analysis, aiding in MCI patient evaluation. In conclusion, the GPT-4 model shows promise as a diagnostic aid for MCI, potentially improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare burdens. However, its practical applicability in real-world scenarios requires further investigation and clinical validation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The DementiaBank dataset utilized in this study is secured by a password and access is limited to members of the DementiaBank Consortium Group. To obtain permission to access this dataset, one must become a member of the DementiaBank Consortium Group. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects in accordance with the DementiaBank guidelines.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The DementiaBank dataset utilized in this study is secured by a password and access is limited to members of the DementiaBank Consortium Group. To obtain permission to access this dataset, one must become a member of the DementiaBank Consortium Group. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects in accordance with the DementiaBank guidelines.
