Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Effectiveness of Bivalent Boosters Over Nine and Half Months in Nebraska

Sai Paritala, Yangjianchen Xu, Yi Du, Matthew Donahue, Patrick Maloney, Dan-Yu Lin
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.03.23299338
Sai Paritala
1Division of Public Health, Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, Lincoln, NE, USA
2Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yangjianchen Xu
3Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yi Du
1Division of Public Health, Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, Lincoln, NE, USA
2Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Donahue
1Division of Public Health, Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, Lincoln, NE, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Maloney
1Division of Public Health, Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, Lincoln, NE, USA
2Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: pamaloney{at}unmc.edu lin{at}bios.unc.edu
Dan-Yu Lin
3Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: pamaloney{at}unmc.edu lin{at}bios.unc.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

On September 1, 2022, Moderna and Pfizer–BioNTech bivalent vaccines replaced existing monovalent vaccines as booster doses against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) for persons aged 12 and older in the United States. We assessed the effectiveness of these bivalent boosters against Omicron infection and severe outcomes (COVID-19 hospitalization and death) over a 9.5-month period using line-level data from the state of Nebraska. We found that the relative effectiveness of bivalent boosters, compared with one fewer vaccine dose, against Omicron infection and subsequent death was 39.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.7 to 42.2) and 70.0% (95% CI, 38.8 to 85.3), respectively, at four weeks post administration and gradually waned afterward. Vaccine effectiveness was broadly similar against different Omicron subvariants.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

None

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The University of Nebraska Institutional Review Board

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data available upon request from the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 04, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effectiveness of Bivalent Boosters Over Nine and Half Months in Nebraska
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Effectiveness of Bivalent Boosters Over Nine and Half Months in Nebraska
Sai Paritala, Yangjianchen Xu, Yi Du, Matthew Donahue, Patrick Maloney, Dan-Yu Lin
medRxiv 2023.12.03.23299338; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.03.23299338
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Effectiveness of Bivalent Boosters Over Nine and Half Months in Nebraska
Sai Paritala, Yangjianchen Xu, Yi Du, Matthew Donahue, Patrick Maloney, Dan-Yu Lin
medRxiv 2023.12.03.23299338; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.03.23299338

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)