Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Liver discard rate due to conservative estimations of steatosis: an inference-based approach

View ORCID ProfileHao Guo, View ORCID ProfileBoris L. Gala-Lopez, View ORCID ProfileIan P.J. Alwayn, Kevin C. Hewitt
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.04.23299406
Hao Guo
1Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, 6310 Coburg Road, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
2Department of Medical Physics, Nova Scotia Health Authority, 5820 University Avenue Halifax, NS B3H 1V7, Canada
BSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hao Guo
Boris L. Gala-Lopez
3Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, 6-300 Victoria Building, 1276 South Park Street, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Boris L. Gala-Lopez
Ian P.J. Alwayn
4Department of Surgery, LUMC Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ian P.J. Alwayn
Kevin C. Hewitt
1Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, 6310 Coburg Road, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kevin.hewitt{at}dal.ca
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background On-site conservative estimations of steatosis could result in the unnecessary discard of donor livers. This study applied the body mass index (BMI) as an independent statistical indicator to determine the extent of this problem. We explored two hypotheses: (I) that because of varying levels of expertise and protocols (reputational risk for pathologists), biopsies at transplant centers overestimate hepatic steatosis (HS), and (ii) that non-biopsy donor liver assessments are more conservative than biopsy-based evaluations.

Methods The study processed cross-database and intra-database comparisons using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) spanning January 2017 to March 2020 in the United States. Post-matching BMI was applied as an independent indicator of statistical risk of HS.

Results Contrary to our first hypothesis, biopsies at transplant centers did not overestimate HS - biopsy-classified donor livers were found in similar or lower risk categories. Consistent with our second hypothesis, absent biopsies, evaluations before and during organ procurement were observed to be more conservative, leading to the discard of 11.9% (373) of potential donor livers.

Conclusions The study concludes that there was a significant (11.9%) disparity caused by on-site non-biopsy assessments of HS, leading to the unnecessary discard of potential donor livers. The findings emphasize the need to develop more accurate intraoperative techniques for assessing HS to optimize donor liver procurement.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

H.G. is support by the Vitamin Scholarship, Dalhousie University and the Research Nova Scotia Doctoral Award, Research Nova Scotia.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study used (or will use) ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/default.aspx?Cycle=2017-2020 https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/view-data-reports/request-data/

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Disclosure: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

  • Funding: H.G. is support by the Vitamin Scholarship, Dalhousie University and the Research Nova Scotia Doctoral Award, Research Nova Scotia.

Data Availability

All data produced are available online at: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/default.aspx?Cycle=2017-2020 https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/view-data-reports/request-data/

https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/default.aspx?Cycle=2017-2020

https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/view-data-reports/request-data/

  • Abbreviations used in this paper

    ALT
    alanine aminotransferase
    AST
    aspartate aminotransferase
    BMI
    body mass index
    CAP
    controlled attenuation parameter
    HS
    hepatic steatosis
    IQR
    interquartile range
    IQRc
    interquartile range of final controlled attenuation parameter
    LT
    liver transplantation
    M
    medium
    MaS
    macrovesicular steatosis
    MiS
    microvesicular steatosis
    NHANES
    National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
    OPTN
    Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network
    SD
    standard deviation
    XL
    extra-large
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted December 05, 2023.
    Download PDF
    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Liver discard rate due to conservative estimations of steatosis: an inference-based approach
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Liver discard rate due to conservative estimations of steatosis: an inference-based approach
    Hao Guo, Boris L. Gala-Lopez, Ian P.J. Alwayn, Kevin C. Hewitt
    medRxiv 2023.12.04.23299406; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.04.23299406
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Liver discard rate due to conservative estimations of steatosis: an inference-based approach
    Hao Guo, Boris L. Gala-Lopez, Ian P.J. Alwayn, Kevin C. Hewitt
    medRxiv 2023.12.04.23299406; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.04.23299406

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Epidemiology
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)