Abstract
Background There is growing evidence for inflammatory mechanisms in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) that have been associated with blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption. Previous studies investigating the BBB in SSD focused on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) markers, that cannot adequately assess BBB integrity. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) represents a sensitive method for investigating subtle barrier breakdown in vivo. So far, only one pilot study has investigated BBB breakdown in SSD with DCE-MRI, in a relatively small cohort. We hypothesized higher leakage in SSD compared to HC, indicative of a clinical sub-phenotype of SSD.
Methods Forty-one people with SSD and 40 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC) were included in the final analyses of the cross-sectional study. DCE-MRI, clinical characterization, cognitive assessments, blood and CSF analyses were conducted. The volume transfer constant Ktrans was calculated with pharmacokinetic modelling (Patlak method), to estimate the rate of contrast agent transfer between blood and the brain’s extravascular space. Ktrans maps were compared between the groups to detect group differences in BBB leakage. Within the SSD cohort, the association between leakage and clinical characteristics was investigated with linear regression analyses.
Results Group comparisons of Ktrans maps showed higher leakage in SSD compared to HC on a whole brain level. The effect was more pronounced in first episode compared to multiple episode psychosis. No association was detected between leakage and measures of cognition, psychopathology, peripheral inflammation and albumin CSF/serum ratio.
Discussion This is the largest study to date investigating the BBB in SSD with DCE-MRI in a multimodal approach, allowing direct exploration of the BBB, compared to a HC group. The integrity of the BBB is crucial for maintaining the brain’s microenvironment, and its disruption could be associated with potential immune system abnormalities. The results of this study provide the first in vivo evidence of higher BBB leakage on a whole brain level compared to HC. The disruption of the BBB in SSD, as detected through DCE-MRI, may provide insights into the disease’s mechanisms and potential for targeted treatments. Further research in this area may clarify specific biological disease mechanisms and identify new therapeutic targets.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared that there are no conflicts of interest in relation to the subject of this study. General declaration of potential conflict of interests: EW has been invited to advisory boards from Recordati and Boehringer Ingelheim. PF received speaker fees by Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Otsuka, Lundbeck, Recordati, and Richter and was member of advisory boards of these companies and Rovi. All other authors report no potential conflicts of interest. AH was member of advisory boards of Boehringer-Ingelheim, Lundbeck, Janssen, Otsuka, Rovi and Recordati and received paid speakership by these companies as well as by AbbVie and Advanz. He is editor of the German schizophrenia guideline.
Funding Statement
This research was not supported by any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. JM was supported by the research funding program "Foerderprogramm fuer Forschung und Lehre (FoeFoLe)", University Hospital, LMU Munich (project number 1167).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of the Ludwig-Maximilian University gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
