Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Literature review of Diabetes noninvasive screening tools for previously undiagnosed. Scoping review

View ORCID ProfileTesfaye Haile
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.19.23300192
Tesfaye Haile
1CUNY Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy
MD, MS.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tesfaye Haile
  • For correspondence: tesfawork{at}gmail.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Diabetes is a severe chronic disease that needs due attention. Worldwide distribution of the disease is increasing in alarming trend marked by its pandemic nature. Numerous people are disabled and dead due to the complexity of the disease and its management. A recent CDC report revealed that in the USA, 37.3 million people have Diabetes (11.3% of the US population). Ninety-six million people aged 18 years and older have prediabetes (38.0% of the adult US population). Worldwide, the number of people with Diabetes rose from 108 million in 1980 to 422 million in 2014. WHO on its sustainable development goal (SDG) report made clear the existing diabetic patient evaluation, intervention, and monitoring method does not adequately address the problem. Paradoxically, the ambitious goal of the American Diabetes Association is: “A Future Without Diabetes.”

The current Diabetes screening method is invasive, provided that scarcity of resources and high cost of test kit makes it nonpractical to frequently checkup. We must proactively engage in its prevention by making screening cheap and easily accessible. So, this review is designed to answer the question: What is an available Diabetes noninvasive screening tool for undiagnosed?

Method The relevant Article was searched from PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and the CINHAL using a combination of the following key constructs: Diabetes screening, Diabetes noninvasive screening, Diabetes AND screening, Diabetes and (“noninvasive” or “non-invasive” or “non invasive”) and “screening tool,” Diabetes AND noninvasive AND screening AND Tool, “Diabetes noninvasive Screening Tool.” The selection process was conducted based on the PRISMA framework statement. Exclusion and inclusion criteria were applied to select the final relevant literature, after which 22 relevant studies were selected.

Result The review included studies conducted from 2013 to 2023, 36% in 2019 and 2022. The included articles are from 13 countries. The data sources for the articles are surveys, databanks, random sampling, and opportunity sampling. A total of 24 key predictors were used to develop 22 types of tools. The researchers used the logistic regression (LR) method while developing most studies, and ML in a couple of them. The Authors described the Tool’s performance using the ROC curve, and the AUC is 0.65-0.93. The developed tool predictive power of the screening Prediabetes used Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV metrics and the result is encouraging.

Conclusion Diabetes noninvasive Screening tests have the potential to identify prediabetes at an early stage and, thus, a more treatable disease that, as a result, saves lives. The developed tools had promising designate ability in pre-DM case findings, as shown by their ROC curve, AUC, sensitivity/specificity, and PPV/NPV. The Tool developed by these researchers looks promising for our goal of screening Diabetes by noninvasive method to answer this review research question using non-laboratory methods, which can be applied by common people regardless of the involvement of health professional skill. This review’s limitations are that the included article’s bias assessment was not performed, and non-English language articles were not included, so this could miss some pertinent tools. Finally, a systematic review, meta-analysis, and RCT on the Tool are recommended to identify any bias during the development of the Tool and possible generalizability of the best Tool for worldwide applicability.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • The 2nd Author is deleted from the Author list.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 29, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Literature review of Diabetes noninvasive screening tools for previously undiagnosed. Scoping review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Literature review of Diabetes noninvasive screening tools for previously undiagnosed. Scoping review
Tesfaye Haile
medRxiv 2023.12.19.23300192; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.19.23300192
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Literature review of Diabetes noninvasive screening tools for previously undiagnosed. Scoping review
Tesfaye Haile
medRxiv 2023.12.19.23300192; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.19.23300192

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)