Abstract
As climate change raises global temperatures, there remains a notable gap in understanding the body’s mechanism of the heat stress defense exhibited by Heat Shock Protein (HSP) within the populations. This study aims to evaluate the expression of heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) in vulnerable populations living in urban and rural areas in response to heat exposure. A comparative cross-sectional study involved 54 urban and 54 rural participants from Klang Valley, Malaysia. This study comprises four methods: Part I involves conducting face-to-face interviews questionnaire; Part II involves monitoring indoor heat exposure and classifying thermal stress using the Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI); Part III involves using the reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and Part IV involves using the HSP70 High Sensitivity Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). The findings revealed that urban areas have a higher heat level, classified as strong UTCI thermal stress (32.1°C), whereas rural areas have moderate UTCI thermal stress (31.0°C). In response to heat stress, the urban vulnerable populations exhibited higher HSP70 gene expression (0.167 ± 0.86) compared to the rural (0.154 ± 0.28). A significant difference (p<0.001) in HSP70 protein expression was observed in the plasma of urban compared to rural vulnerable populations. There was a strong association between UTCI heat exposure level and the expression of the HSP70 gene and protein in both vulnerable population groups (p<0.001). Although susceptible to vulnerabilities, the populations demonstrated HSP70 expressions in response to varying levels of heat exposure as a coping mechanism at the cellular level.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://www.abcam.com/products/elisa/hsp70-high-sensitivity-elisa-kit-ab133061.html
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study obtained ethical approval from the Ethics Committee for Research Involving Human Subjects of Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) (Ref. No.: JKEUPM-2022-222). Permission from the respondents was obtained through written informed consent.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
