Abstract
Objective To co-design, implement, evaluate acceptability and refine an optimised antenatal education session to improve birth preparedness.
Design There were four distinct phases: co-design (focus groups and co-design workshops with parents and staff); implementation of intervention; evaluation (interviews, questionnaires, structured feedback forms), and systematic refinement.
Setting A single maternity unit with approximately 5,500 births annually.
Participants Postnatal and antenatal women/birthing people, birth partners and clinicians. Outcome measures: To establish whether the optimised session is deliverable, acceptable, meets the needs of women/birthing people and partners, and refine it with input from parents, clinicians and researchers.
Results The co-design was undertaken by 35 women, partners and clinicians. Five midwives were trained and delivered 19 Antenatal education (ACE) sessions to 142 women and 94 partners. 121 women and 33 birth partners completed the feedback questionnaire. Women/birthing people(79%) and birth partners(82%) felt more prepared after the class with most participants finding the content very helpful or helpful. Women/birthing people perceived classes were more useful and engaging than their partners. Interviews with 21 parents, a midwife focus group and a structured feedback form resulted in 38 recommended changes: 22 by parents, 5 by midwives and 11 by both. Suggested changes have been incorporated in the training resources to achieve an optimised intervention.
Conclusions Engaging stakeholders (women and staff) in co-designing an evidence informed curriculum resulted in an antenatal class designed to improve preparedness for birth, including assisted birth, that is acceptable to women and their birthing partners, and has been refined to address feedback and is deliverable within NHS resource constraints. A nationally-mandated antenatal education curriculum is needed to ensure parents receive high-quality antenatal education that targets birth preparedness.
What is already known Antenatal education is used to prepare women/birthing parents for labour, birth and the postnatal period, but it has been eroded. Antenatal education has potential to support women/birthing parents in developing their expectations around labour and the postnatal period, via improved health literacy. Improving antenatal education could be impactful as the expectation-experience gap is linked to post traumatic stress disorder.
What this study adds We have shown that a co-designed, optimised antenatal class can provide information helpful to parents and important to staff, within the constraints of the NHS resources
How this study might affect research, practice or policy This study can be used to understand what parents need from antenatal education, and how to begin to address the expectation-experience gap.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a Health Foundation Innovating for Improvement award, a David Telling Award and the Elizabeth Blackwell Institute, University of Bristol, and funded in whole, or in part, by the Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund [Grant number - 204813/Z/16/Z]. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. AM/MT/ADe were funded by the NIHR for this research project. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR, NHS or the UK Department of Health and Social Care.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by Wales Research Ethics Committee 6 (reference: 21/WA/0091).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request with appropriate ethical approvals in place.
