Abstract
Objectives Depressive disorders are common in the primary care setting. Primary care practitioners must deal with different disorders and keep up with evidence-based treatment. Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) offer accessible information about up-to-date care but are poorly implemented. Research on the implementation of CPGs has focused on the practitioners’ perspective but has neglected the patients’ perspective largely.
This scoping review aimed to identify terms related to the concept of ‘patients’ perspectives on depression treatment in primary care building a comprehensive framework and to identify researched barriers and facilitators to partaking in care.
Methods We conducted a scoping review on Medline and Psycinfo. Eligible publications contained information from the patients’ point of view on depression treatment in primary care in OECD member states. We used the PCC-framework to obtain inclusion criteria. Publications until August 2nd 2023 were considered.
Results We included 232 publications. Current literature focuses on behavioral and easily collected measures like satisfaction and on patient-sided barriers and facilitators to adherence. Other treatment-related behaviors are less researched. Patients often report exclusively or mainly physical symptoms in their visits which can impede diagnosis.
Conclusion This review provides a comprehensive framework for the concept. Research on the patients’ perspective on depression treatment in primary care is still inconclusive.
Registration This review is registered via OSF (https://osf.io/p9rnc).
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data for the evidence synthesis is given in the appendix. Complete search and review files (Rayyan export files) can be acquired by emailing the corresponding author.
