Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Educational interventions delivered to prescribing advisers to influence primary care prescribing: a very low-cost pragmatic randomised trial using routine data from OpenPrescribing.net

View ORCID ProfileHelen J Curtis, View ORCID ProfileBrian MacKenna, Bhavana Reddy, Alex J Walker, View ORCID ProfileSebastian Bacon, View ORCID ProfileRafael Perera, View ORCID ProfileBen Goldacre
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.05.24300907
Helen J Curtis
1The Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Helen J Curtis
  • For correspondence: helen.curtis{at}phc.ox.ac.uk
Brian MacKenna
1The Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
2NHS England, 80 London Road, London, England, SE1 6LH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Brian MacKenna
Bhavana Reddy
2NHS England, 80 London Road, London, England, SE1 6LH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex J Walker
1The Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sebastian Bacon
1The Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sebastian Bacon
Rafael Perera
3Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rafael Perera
Ben Goldacre
1The Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ben Goldacre
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background NHS England issued commissioning guidance on 18 low-priority treatments which should not be routinely prescribed in primary care. We aimed to monitor the impact of an educational intervention delivered to regional prescribing advisors by senior pharmacists from NHS England on the primary care spend on low-priority items.

Methods An opportunistic randomised, controlled parallel-group trial. Participants (clinical commissioning groups, CCGs) were randomised to intervention or control in a 1:1 ratio. The intervention group were invited to participate. The intervention was a one-off educational session. Our primary outcomes concerned the total prescribing of low-priority items in primary care. Secondary outcomes concerned the prescribing of specific low-priority items. We also measured the impact on information-seeking behaviour.

Results 40 CCGs were randomised, 20 allocated to intervention, with 11 receiving the intervention. There was no significant impact on any prescribing outcomes. There was some possible evidence of increased engagement with data, in the form of CCG email alert sign-ups (p=0.077). No harms were detected.

Conclusions A one-off intervention delivered to CCGs by NHS England did not significantly influence low-priority prescribing. This trial demonstrates how routine interventions planned to improve uptake or adherence to healthcare guidance can be delivered as low-cost randomised trials and how to robustly assess their effectiveness.

Competing Interest Statement

Authors declare the following: BG has received research funding from the Bennett Foundation, the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, the NHS National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), the NIHR School of Primary Care Research, the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, the Mohn-Westlake Foundation, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Oxford and Thames Valley, Wellcome Trust, the Good Thinking Foundation, Health Data Research UK, the Health Foundation, the World Health Organisation, UKRI, Asthma UK, the British Lung Foundation, and the Longitudinal Health and Wellbeing strand of the National Core Studies programme; he also receives personal income from speaking and writing for lay audiences on the misuse of science. BMK and BR work for the NHS and BMK is seconded to the Bennett Institute. RP acknowledges partial support from the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Oxford & Thames Valley, the NIHR Programme Grants for Applied Research, the NIHR Oxford Medtech and In-Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative and the Oxford Martin School. He also receives payment for editorial work carried out for the BMJ and BMJ Medicine Journals. All other University of Oxford authors are employed on BGs grants.

Clinical Trial

ISRCTN31218900

Clinical Protocols

https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7201079.v1

Funding Statement

This work was supported by The NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, the Health Foundation (Award Reference Number 7599); National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) School of Primary Care Research (SPCR) (Award Reference Number 327); the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme (Grant Reference Number PB-PG-0418-20036) and by the National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration Oxford and Thames Valley. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR, NHS England or the Department of Health and Social Care. Funders had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Medical Sciences Interdivisional Research Ethics Committee of the University of Oxford waived ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

  • Abbreviations

    CCG
    Clinical Commissioning Group
    MO
    Medicines Optimisation
    NHS
    National Health Service
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted January 07, 2024.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Educational interventions delivered to prescribing advisers to influence primary care prescribing: a very low-cost pragmatic randomised trial using routine data from OpenPrescribing.net
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Educational interventions delivered to prescribing advisers to influence primary care prescribing: a very low-cost pragmatic randomised trial using routine data from OpenPrescribing.net
    Helen J Curtis, Brian MacKenna, Bhavana Reddy, Alex J Walker, Sebastian Bacon, Rafael Perera, Ben Goldacre
    medRxiv 2024.01.05.24300907; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.05.24300907
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Educational interventions delivered to prescribing advisers to influence primary care prescribing: a very low-cost pragmatic randomised trial using routine data from OpenPrescribing.net
    Helen J Curtis, Brian MacKenna, Bhavana Reddy, Alex J Walker, Sebastian Bacon, Rafael Perera, Ben Goldacre
    medRxiv 2024.01.05.24300907; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.05.24300907

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Health Policy
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)