Characteristics, temporal trends, and outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis in stroke patients aged > 80 years in China

Chang-sheng Li, Ying-yu Jiang, Hong-Qiu Gu, Meng Wang, Zi-mo Chen, Xin Yang, Qi Zhou, Xia Meng, Chun-juan Wang, Zi-xiao Li
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.11.24301186

Abstract

Background/Purpose No large cohort study has examined intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in Chinese patients aged > 80 years.We aim to evaluate temporal trends in alteplase use, clinical characteristics, and outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients over 80 years of age in China.

Methods Data were collected from The China Stroke Center Alliance program, which is a nationwide, multicenter, prospective registry at 1751 hospitals in 31 provinces, between January 1, 2018, and December 14, 2022.The primary outcome was a modified Rankin scale score (mRS) of 0-2 at discharge, and the secondary study outcomes were an mRS score 0-1 and independent ambulation at discharge. The safety outcomes included in-hospital mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage(sICH).

Results Of 212,814 patients eligible for thrombolysis, 30,902 patients were aged > 80 years; among them, 8,673 patients (median [IQR] age, 84 [82-87] years) were treated with alteplase, 52.7% of whom were female (n=4570). The usage rate of alteplase in elderly patients increased from 22.1% in 2018 to 35.7% in 2022, while the rate among younger patients increased from 30.5% in 2018 to 43.3% in 2022. Patients treated with alteplase had better short-term functional outcomes, including mRS scores 0-2 (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.13, 95% CI 1.08-1.19, p<0.001), mRS scores 0-1 (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.09-1.20, p<0.001), and independent ambulation at discharge (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.19-1.39, p<0.001). Furthermore, there was no increased risk of in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.79-1.08, p=0.31). However, alteplase was associated with a higher risk of sICH (aOR 2.85, 95% CI 2.48-3.27, p<0.001).

Conclusions Elderly patients receiving IVT with alteplase had better short-term functional outcomes without an increased risk of in-hospital mortality; however, elderly patients are at higher risk of developing symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.

Introduction

Stroke is the leading cause of death in China,1–3 and China has the highest estimated lifetime risk of stroke among individuals aged 25 years and above.4 Despite the aggressive stroke prevention strategies implemented by the Chinese government, the prevalence of stroke continues to increase with the increasing population.3,5 Furthermore, the prevalence of stroke increases with age. In 2019, the prevalence of ischemic stroke in patients aged 65-69 was 6.58%, while the prevalence in patients aged 80 years and above was as high as 12.81%.6 Importantly, acute ischemic stroke in elderly patients results in a more severe neurological deficit than stroke among younger individuals, thus producing more disabling and fatal outcomes.7 With the deepening of China’s aging society, China’s population aged 80 years and above is growing rapidly. The population of this age group was 26 million in 2019, and it is expected to grow to 115 million by 2050.8 Therefore, it is necessary to determine how to reduce the disability rate of elderly stroke patients (> 80 years old).

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase is an effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke by reperfusion and reduces the disability rate associated with ischemic stroke.9,10 However, its application has been limited based on age. In 2013 and 2014, respectively, the American Heart Association11 and the Chinese Academy of Neurology12 no longer considered age older than 80 years as a contraindication for IVT within 3 hours from symptom onset. In 2018, the IVT time window was reported to be 4.5 hours.13,14 As the guidelines are being revised at both domestic and international levels, many elderly patients will be eligible for benefits. As a result, the rate of intravenous thrombolysis in elderly American patients increased significantly from 2016 to 2017 compared to 2008 to 2009.15 To date, there has been no large cohort study of IVT in patients aged > 80 years in China.16,17 In addition, trends in the rate of IVT use among elderly patients remain understudied. A complete understanding of the status and trends of IVT in elderly patients in China will help managers and doctors develop more accurate treatment strategies for elderly patients and improve the rate of IVT in elderly patients.

This study aims to explore the in-hospital outcomes in elderly patients treated with IVT with or without alteplase and describe the temporal trend of the IVT rate in patients > 80 and ≤80 years old.

Methods

The China Stroke Center Alliance (CSCA) program is a nationwide, multicenter, voluntary, prospective registry aimed at implementing a continuous quality improvement initiative for stroke. The design and data collection plan has been described in detail previously.18 All secondary and tertiary hospitals in China were given access to this program. This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethical review board of Beijing Tiantan Hospital (ethical approval number: KY2018-061-02). The design and data collection plan has been described in detail previously. Trained hospital personnel gathered data from a web-based Patient Management Tool (Medicine Innovation Research Center). The China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases served as the center for data analysis. They also consented to examine the collective deidentified data to evaluate care quality and conduct research. The following data were collected at admission: demographic characteristics (sex, age, BMI), risk factors (smoking, drinking, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, prior stroke/TIA), NIHSS score at admission, stroke severity, onset-to-door time, onset-to-treatment time, door-to-needle time, dose of alteplase, medical history, hospital grade (secondary and tertiary hospitals), and hospital region (east, central, and western).

Patient Population

This study included patients with ischemic stroke from 1,751 hospitals in the CSCA from January 1, 2018, to December 14, 2022. Patients were considered to be eligible if they had symptom onset within 4.5 h and had no absolute contraindications to thrombolysis based on the guidelines.11 Patients were excluded if they underwent thrombectomy, received other thrombolytic agents, underwent intra-arterial thrombolysis, or had missing information, such as NIHSS score at admission, prior mRS score, unclear key time (door-to-needle time or/and onset to treatment time), dose of alteplase, and in-hospital outcomes.

Outcome Measurement

Five in-hospital outcomes were measured. The primary outcome was a modified Rankin scale score (mRS, range from 0 [normal] to 6 [death]) of 0-2 at discharge, and the secondary outcomes were an mRS of 0-1 and independent ambulation at discharge. Safety outcomes included in-hospital mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) per the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) criterion, which is defined as any cerebral parenchymal hemorrhage confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with any clinical deterioration within 36 hours after treatment.9 Predefined subgroups based on sex, stroke severity classified by NIHSS (0-4 [mild], 5-15 [moderate], 15-20 [moderate to severe], > 20 [severe]), previous stroke or TIA, diabetes, and atrial fibrillation were used to analyze the effect of treatment on the primary outcome in elderly patients with IS.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables are presented as medians, while categorical variables are described as frequencies and percentages. The chi-square test was conducted to compare categorical variables between age groups at baseline, while the Kruskal‒ Wallis test was conducted to compare continuous variables.

Multivariable regression models were used to evaluate the in-hospital outcomes in elderly patients with and without alteplase. To account for differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, analyses were performed in a propensity-weighted population using the inverse probability-weighted method to calculate the propensity score (IPTW, adjusted model 1).19,20 For sensitivity analysis, a logistic model without propensity weighting explaining the clustering effect was also applied and presented (adjusted model 2). The models were adjusted for covariates, including sex, age, hospital characteristics, body mass index, risk factors (previous stroke/transient ischemic attack and atrial fibrillation), and medical history (antiplatelet agents and statins).

In the subgroup analysis, we explored the interaction of the effect of the treatment regimen on the primary outcome in specific subgroups by multivariate regression models with generalized estimating equations.

Temporal trends in IVT with alteplase between specified age groups (aged ≤80 years vs. aged >80 years) from 2018 to 2022 were assessed by Cochran-Armitage trend tests.

Missing outcome variables and variables in the univariate tables were excluded. Sensitivity analysis was performed to compare the baseline differences between populations with and without missing variables.

All P values were 2-sided, with P <.05 considered significant. Due to the large sample size, small differences may have been statistically significant but not clinically significant. Consequently, we computed absolute standardized differences to compare the characteristics of elderly patients with or without alteplase, considering an absolute standardized difference exceeding 10% as significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics

After excluding ineligible patients, 212,814 patients with IS were included across 1,751 hospitals from January 1, 2018, to 2022 December 14, 2022. Among them, 30,902 patients were aged > 80 years, 8,673 patients received IVT with alteplase, and 22,229 patients received IVT without alteplase (Figure 1, eTable 1). Among the patients aged > 80 years (Table 1), the median age of patients in the IVT with alteplase group was 84 years (IQR 82.0-87.0), with female predominance (4570, 52.7%), and the door-to-needle time was 44.2 min (median, IQR 29.0-65.0 min).

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Flowchart for patient selection.

BMI, body mass index; CSCA, Chinese Stroke Center Alliance; IVT, intravenous thrombolysis; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; mRS,modified Rankin Scale; tPA, tissue-type plasminogen activator

View this table:
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients aged >80 years according to assigned treatment.

Compared with the patients without alteplase, patients with alteplase had more severe stroke (NIHSS [median, 9 vs. 5]), lower body mass index (median 21.7 [IQR, 19.2-24.2] vs. 22.8 [IQR, 20.8-24.8]), a higher proportion of previous atrial fibrillation (20.7% vs. 15.8%), a lower proportion of previous stroke or TIA (27.0% vs. 37.5%), shorter time from onset to door (1.5 h [IQR, 0.9-2.2] vs. 1.9 h [IQR, 1.0-3.0]), and lower use rates of antiplatelet drugs (17.9% vs. 24.2%) and statins (15.4% vs. 21.0%).

Patients with missing outcome data were excluded from the model for these outcomes. The sensitivity analysis showed no baseline differences between study patients with and without missing variables. (eTable 2).

In-hospital outcomes for elderly patients

A comparison of the outcome measures is presented in Table 2. After adjusting for covariates by inverse probability weighted scores, elderly patients with alteplase had better functional outcomes at discharge, including proportion of mRS 0-2 (4815 [55.5%], aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.09-1.20, p<0.001), mRS 0-1 (3743 [43.3%], aOR 1.13, 95% CI 1.08-1.19, p<0.001), and independent ambulation (5640 [65.0%], aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.19-1.39, p<0.001). The elderly patients treated with alteplase had higher rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (4.9% [423/8673] vs. 1.2% [273/22229], aOR 2.85, 95% CI 2.48-3.27, p<0.001) but a comparable incidence of in-hospital mortality (2.3% [203/8673] vs. 1.3% [292/22229], aOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.79-1.08, p=0.31).

View this table:
Table 2. Comparison of the in-hospital outcomes in patients aged >80 years for stroke IV with or without alteplase.

Subgroup analysis

As shown in Figure 2, we performed an exploratory subgroup analysis stratified by sex stroke severity by NIHSS (0-4, 5-15, 15-20, > 20), previous stroke/TIA (yes vs. no), atrial fibrillation (yes vs. no) and diabetes (yes vs. no). Using multivariate regression models, similar effects of the treatment regimen on the discharge mRS score of 0-2 were seen in all subgroups except for patients combined with diabetes (p=0.59 for interaction).

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Subgroup analysis of the primary outcome in patients older than 80 years according to assigned treatment.

Temporal trends in IVT rates among potentially eligible patients

As shown in Figure 3, the treatment rates with IVT in potentially eligible patients increased in both age groups. Throughout the study period, the use rates of patients aged > 80 years increased from 22.1% in 2018 to 35.7% in 2022, compared with younger patients from 30.5% in 2018 to 43.3% in 2022. The absolute growth rate in both age groups was similar (13.6% vs. 12.8%) throughout the study period, although patients aged older than 80 years started from a lower baseline. As a comparison, older patients show a more significant average annual growth rate of IVT compared to younger patients (10.0% vs. 7.4%).

Figure 3.
Figure 3. Temporal trends in rates of IV with alteplase among potentially eligible patients from 2018 to 2022.

Use of IVT with in all patients (A) and in patients aged aged> 80 years and 80 years old and below(B). Shading represents 95% CIs.

Discussion

To our knowledge, there has been no large-scale research on IVT in patients with IS aged > 80 years in China. In this large cohort study of a nationwide stroke registry, we found that treatment with IVT with alteplase in stroke patients aged >80 years was associated with better functional outcomes at discharge and did not increase the incidence of in-hospital mortality despite the increased risk of sICH compared with treatment with IVT without alteplase. Few observational studies have compared the efficacy and safety of IV thrombolysis in older patients. Our findings are consistent with the largest observational study from the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke–International Stroke Thrombolysis Registry (SITS-ISTR) and the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA).21 The SITS-ISTR study consisted of 29,500 patients, with 3,472 (11.8%) of them being ≥80 years old. The results of the sensitivity analysis showed that the treatment group (IV with alteplase) was associated with higher 3-month functional outcomes than the control group (for good outcome defined as an mRS score of 0–2: OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.7–2.5; for excellent outcome defined as an mRS score of 0–1: OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.5–2.3).

Our findings revealed that the proportion of elderly patients treated with alteplase who had an mRS score of 0-2 at discharge was 55.0% (n=4815). This was higher than the proportion observed in a large study conducted in the Baden-Wuerttemberg stroke registry. In this study, the proportion of elderly patients aged 80-89 years who received IVT with mRS scores of 0-2 at discharge was 32.0% (n=2849), while for patients aged 90 years and above, it was 17.0% (n=394)22.

The use of thrombolysis for AIS is associated with an increased risk of sICH soon after treatment.23,24 Our study found that the incidence of sICH was 2.85 times higher in elderly patients who underwent IVT with alteplase than in those who did not. Nevertheless, the incidence of sICH per NINDS in elderly patients (5%) was lower than that reported in previous studies (ranging from 6.7 to 17.5%).7,22,25,26 This may be attributed to the lower baseline NIHSS scores in elderly patients with alteplase. The risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after thrombolysis is associated with stroke severity.24 In this study, the baseline NIHSS score of elderly patients with alteplase was lower than that in the RCT (mean [SD], 13.3 [6.4])18 and the registry study (median, 14),7,22,27 which could explain our low incidence of sICH. Our study found that intravenous thrombolysis did not increase short-term mortality in elderly patients with stroke. This is consistent with the results of individual analyses based on seven RCTs.28 This study found no significant difference in mortality within 7 days between the alteplase treatment and placebo groups (10.6% vs. 7.8%, p=0.13). Similar results were observed for death within 90 days between the two groups.

The IVT rate increased annually in older and younger patients during the study period. The average annual growth rate in older patients was higher than that in younger patients (10.0% vs. 7.4%), similar to the increasing trend in the IVT rate in developed countries. However, our research found that the IVT rate for patients within 4.5 hours of stroke symptom onset was still much lower than the 63.9% in the Get with the Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-Stroke) in the United States.29 Moreover, our results showed that the rate of IVT in elderly patients was only 34.2% in 2022, which means that approximately two-thirds of eligible patients aged > 80 years did not receive IVT. Therefore, the thrombolysis rate in elderly patients requires further improvement.

Interestingly, in the subgroup analysis, we found that elderly patients with stroke and diabetes had similar short-term functional outcomes of IVT with and without alteplase. Although a history of diabetes was not an exclusion criterion for thrombolysis,14 it was associated with worse thrombolysis outcomes.30,31 Moreover, a previous study showed that patients with stroke and diabetes receiving alteplase are associated with worse in-hospital functional outcomes (mRS 0-2) than untreated patients.32 The benefit of IVT in patients aged > 80 years with prior stroke and concomitant diabetes mellitus is not fully established. 14 The recanalization rate after IVT was independently influenced by the presence of diabetes in AIS.33 Both chronic and acute hyperglycemia induced by diabetes may contribute to blood coagulation activation and hypofibrinolysis.34 Furthermore, diabetes is often associated with hyperinsulinemia, which may lead to a stronger hypercoagulability35 and decreased fibrinolytic activity by increased production of plasminogen activator inhibitors,36 and these factors reduce the vascular recanalization rate in patients with ischemic stroke. This partially explains why elderly patients in our results exhibited similar functional outcomes with thrombolysis and nonthrombolysis.

Some limitations should be mentioned before generalizing the present findings. First, our study lacked data on the lack of postdischarge 90-day outcomes. However, disability status at discharge and ambulation have been demonstrated to be closely associated with 90-day outcomes37; therefore, predictive factors of disability status at discharge may also predict disability changes at 90 days. Second, the design of this retrospective and nonrandomized study may lead to selection bias, and we used the inverse probability weighting method to minimize the impact of this selection bias on the results. Third, this study only included data from CSCA hospitals, not from all hospitals in China. However, the CSCA is the largest stroke registry and quality care improvement program conducted in China, with over 1 million patients with acute ischemic stroke from 1751 hospitals included in this study. A sufficiently large sample size rendered the results representative.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this nationwide, multicenter registry study on IVT for patients aged > 80 years with IS demonstrated that IVT with alteplase in these elderly patients is effective. Furthermore, the results revealed that higher rates of sICH do not increase in-hospital mortality. These findings add to the evidence regarding the efficacy of IVT with alteplase in elderly patients in China. The rate of IVT in elderly patients has increased annually. Nevertheless, approximately 2/3 of elderly patients do not receive thrombolysis. For elderly stroke patients with diabetes mellitus, the benefits and risks of IVT need to be carefully evaluated. Further research is necessary to determine the medium- and long-term benefits of IVT in elderly patients, especially those with diabetes.

Data Availability

After publication of the completed study, data are available upon reasonable request, which will be considered by the corresponding authors based on the information provided by the requester regarding the study and analysis plan.

Sources of Funding

This study was supported by grants 2022YFC2504902 and 2022YFC2504904 from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China, grant Z200016 from the Beijing Natural Science Foundation, grant 2018000021223ZK03 from Beijing Talents Project, and grants Z201100005620010 and Z211100002921064 from the Beijing Municipal Committee of Science and Technology.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose to declare.

Acknowledgments

We thank all participating hospitals, relevant clinicians, statisticians, and imaging and laboratory technicians. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Stroke in china: Advances and challenges in epidemiology, prevention, and management. The Lancet Neurology. 2019;18:394–405
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.
    Wang YJ, Li ZX, Gu HQ, Zhai Y, Jiang Y, Zhao XQ, et al. China stroke statistics 2019: A report from the national center for healthcare quality management in neurological diseases, china national clinical research center for neurological diseases, the chinese stroke association, national center for chronic and non-communicable disease control and prevention, chinese center for disease control and prevention and institute for global neuroscience and stroke collaborations. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2020;5:211–239
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Li Z, Jiang Y, Li H, Xian Y, Wang Y. China’s response to the rising stroke burden. BMJ. 2019;364:l879
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Feigin VL, Nguyen G, Cercy K, Johnson CO, Roth GA, GBD 2016 Lifetime Risk of Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and country-specific lifetime risks of stroke, 1990 and 2016. New England Journal of Medicine. 2018;379:2429-2437
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Tu WJ, Zhao Z, Yin P, Cao L, Zeng J, Chen H, et al. Estimated burden of stroke in china in 2020. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6:e231455
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    Ma Q, Li R, Wang L, Yin P, Yang Y. Temporal trend and attributable risk factors of stroke burden in china, 1990–2019: An analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. The Lancet Public Health. 2021;6:e897-e906
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    Ford GA, Ahmed N, Azevedo E, Grond M, Larrue V, Lindsberg PJ, et al. Intravenous alteplase for stroke in those older than 80 years old. Stroke. 2010;41:2568–2574
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Fang EF, Xie C, Schenkel JA, Wu C, Long Q, Cui H, et al. A research agenda for ageing in China in the 21st century (2nd edition): Focusing on basic and translational research, long-term care, policy and social networks. Ageing Res Rev. 2020;64:101174
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    National Institute of Neurological D, Stroke rt PASSG. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1581–1587
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Rabinstein A. Stroke treatment with alteplase given 3·0–4·5h after onset of acute ischaemic stroke (ecass iii): Additional outcomes and subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Yearbook of Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2010;2010:35–38
  11. 11.↵
    Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP, Bruno A, Connors JJ, Demaerschalk BM, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. STROKE-DALLAS-. 2013
  12. 12.↵
    Neurology Society of Chinese Medical Association, Cerebrovascular Disease Group, Neurology Society of Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke in China 2014. Chin J Neurol. 2015,48(4):246-257
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    Elkind JJWAHLSSV. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke - 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation. 2019;50
  14. 14.↵
    Neurology Society of Chinese Medical Association, Cerebrovascular Disease Group, Neurology Society of Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke in China 2018. Chin J Neurol. 2018,51 (9):666-680
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    Otite FO, Saini V, Sur NB, Patel S, Sharma R, Akano EO, et al. Ten-year trend in age, sex, and racial disparity in tpa (alteplase) and thrombectomy use following stroke in the united states. Stroke. 2021;52:2562–2570
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    Yang J, Liang H, Song Y, Shen L, Wang S. Analysis of the efficacy and safety of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for chinese patients over 80 years of age with acute ischemic stroke: A pilot study. Neuroscience Bulletin. 2016;32:202–203
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    Yan, Chen, Chen-hua, Li, Yu-Xin, Wang, et al. Safety and effectiveness of intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in 80years and older acute ischemic stroke patients. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2015;72:883–888
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    Wang Y, Li Z, Wang Y, Zhao X, Liu L, Yang X, et al. Chinese stroke center alliance:A national effort to improve healthcare quality for acute stroke and transient ischaemic attack: Rationale,design and preliminary findings. 2018;3:7
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    Li F, Morgan KL, Zaslavsky AM. Balancing covariates via propensity score weighting. J Am Stat Assoc. 2018;113:390–400
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    Thomas LE, Li F, Pencina MJ. Overlap weighting. JAMA. 2020;323(23):2417–2418
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Mishra NK, Ahmed N, Andersen G, Egido JA, Lindsberg PJ, Ringleb PA, et al. Thrombolysis in very elderly people: Controlled comparison of sits international stroke thrombolysis registry and virtual international stroke trials archive. BMJ. 2010;341:c6046
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    Reuter B, Gumbinger C, Sauer T, Wiethölter H, Bruder I, Rode S, et al. Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke in the elderly: Data from the baden-wuerttemberg stroke registry. European Journal of Neurology. 2016
  23. 23.↵
    Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P, Blackwell L, Albers G, Bluhmki E, et al. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: A meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;384(9958):1929-1935.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Whiteley WN, Emberson J, Lees KR, Blackwell L, Albers G, Bluhmki E, et al. Risk of intracerebral haemorrhage with alteplase after acute ischaemic stroke: A secondary analysis of an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:925–933
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Ringleb PA, Schwark C, Kohrmann M, Kulkens S, Juttler E, Hacke W, et al. Thrombolytic therapy for acute ischaemic stroke in octogenarians: Selection by magnetic resonance imaging improves safety but does not improve outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:690–693
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Boulouis G, Dumont F, Cordonnier C, Bodenant M, Hénon H. Intravenous thrombolysis for acute cerebral ischaemia in old stroke patients >= 80 years of age. Journal of Neurology. 2011;259:1461–1467
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    Niaz, Ahmed, Kennedy, R., Lees, Peter, et al. Outcome after stroke thrombolysis in patients >80 years treated within 3 hours vs >3–4.5 hours. Neurology. 2017;89
  28. 28.↵
    Bluhmki E, ThierryBiegert, GabrieleHacke, WernerLees, Kennedy R. Alteplase for acute ischemic stroke in patients aged >80 years pooled analyses of individual patient data. Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation. 2020;51
  29. 29.↵
    Zhao, Xian, Bhatt, D. L, Schwamm, L. H, et al. Door-to-needle times for tissue plasminogen activator administration and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke before and after a quality improvement initiative. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association. 2014;311:1632–1640
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Desilles JP, Meseguer E, Labreuche J, Lapergue B, Sirimarco G, Gonzalez-Valcarcel J, et al. Diabetes mellitus, admission glucose, and outcomes after stroke thrombolysis: A registry and systematic review. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2013;44:1915–1923
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    Nikneshan D, Raptis R, Pongmoragot J, Zhou L, Johnston SC, Saposnik G. Predicting clinical outcomes and response to thrombolysis in acute stroke patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013
  32. 32.↵
    De Silva DA, Ebinger M, Christensen S, Parsons MW, Levi C, Butcher K, et al. Baseline diabetic status and admission blood glucose were poor prognostic factors in the epithet trial.Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;29(1):14–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    Tang H, Zhang S, Yan S, Liebeskind DS, Sun J, Ding X, et al. Unfavorable neurological outcome in diabetic patients with acute ischemic stroke is associated with incomplete recanalization after intravenous thrombolysis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8(4):342–346.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    Vaidyula VR, Rao AK, Mozzoli M, Homko C, Cheung P, Boden G. Effects of hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia on circulating tissue factor procoagulant activity and platelet CD40 ligand. Diabetes. 2006;55(1):202–208.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    Lemkes BA, Hermanides J, Devries JH, Holleman F, Meijers JC, Hoekstra JB. Hyperglycemia: A prothrombotic factor? J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(8):1663–1669.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    Pandolfi A, Giaccari A, Cilli C, Alberta MM, Morviducci L, Filippis EAD, et al. Acute hyperglycemia and acute hyperinsulinemia decrease plasma fibrinolytic activity and increase plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 in the rat. Acta Diabetol. 2001;38(2):71–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    Elhabr A, Katz J, Wang J, Bastani M, Martinez G, Gribko M, et al. Predicting 90-day modified rankin scale score with discharge information in acute ischaemic stroke patients following treatment. BMJ Neurol Open. 2021;3(1):e000177.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top
Posted January 13, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Characteristics, temporal trends, and outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis in stroke patients aged > 80 years in China
Chang-sheng Li, Ying-yu Jiang, Hong-Qiu Gu, Meng Wang, Zi-mo Chen, Xin Yang, Qi Zhou, Xia Meng, Chun-juan Wang, Zi-xiao Li
medRxiv 2024.01.11.24301186; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.11.24301186
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area