Abstract
Background Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic lung condition that is more prevalent in males than females. The reasons for this are not fully understood, with differing environmental exposures due to historically sex-biased occupations, or diagnostic bias, being possible explanations. To date, over 20 independent genetic variants have been identified to be associated with IPF susceptibility, but these have been discovered when combining males and females. Our aim was to test for the presence of sex-specific associations with IPF susceptibility and assess whether there is a need to consider sex-specific effects when evaluating genetic risk in clinical prediction models for IPF.
Methods We performed genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-by-sex interaction studies of IPF risk in six independent IPF case-control studies and combined them using inverse-variance weighted fixed effect meta-analysis. In total, 4,561 cases (1,280 females and 2,281 males) and 23,500 controls (8,360 females and 14,528 males) of European genetic ancestry were analysed. We used polygenic risk scores (PRS) to assess differences in genetic risk prediction between males and females.
Findings Three independent genetic association signals were identified. All showed a consistent direction of effect across all individual IPF studies and an opposite direction of effect in IPF susceptibility between females and males. None had been previously identified in IPF susceptibility genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The predictive accuracy of the PRSs were similar between males and females, regardless of whether using combined or sex-specific GWAS results.
Interpretation We prioritised three genetic variants whose effect on IPF risk may be modified by sex, however these require further study. We found no evidence that the predictive accuracy of common SNP-based PRSs varies significantly between males and females.
Evidence before this study The prevalence of IPF is higher in males than females. IPF risk has a genetic component, but analyses have only been performed in studies where males and females have been combined. One previous study reported sex-specific differences in association for the MUC5B promoter variant, rs35705950, however the finding was not replicated in an independent study. No genome-wide association studies assessing for different genetic risk factors between males and females have been conducted for IPF. It is not known whether approaches to predict individuals at risk of IPF should take sex- specific genetic risk into consideration.
Added value of this study This was the largest study to test whether there are genetic variants whose effects on IPF susceptibility are different in males and females. The MUC5B promotor variant rs35705950 did not show a different magnitude of effect in males vs females. We identified three genetic variants with opposite directions of effect on IPF risk in males vs females. Our polygenic risk score analyses suggested that genetic prediction based on data from males and females separately did not perform better than when males and females were combined.
Implications of all available evidence Although we found some preliminary evidence of genetic variants with sex-specific effects on IPF risk, our analyses suggest that genome-wide genetic risk from common single nucleotide polymorphisms is similar in males and females. This is important when considering integration of polygenic risk scores into clinical prediction models for IPF. There may be other forms of genetic variation, such as complex structural variation or rare variants, not captured in this analysis, that may improve risk prediction for males and females separately.
Competing Interest Statement
AA declares funding from NIH (K23HL146942); consulting fees from Genentech, Inogen, Medscape, Abbvie, PatientMpower and Boehringer Ingelheim; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Boehringer Ingelheim. ADS is a full-time employee of Genentech/Roche with stock and stock options in Roche. AFG was a full-time employee of PPD, Part of Thermo Fisher Scientific until June 2023. BGG declares fellowship funding from Wellcome Trust (221680/Z/20/Z). BLY is a full-time employee of Genentech/Roche with stock and stock options in Roche. CF declares funding Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Instituto de Salud Carlos III and Instituto Tecnologico y de Energias Renovables; honoraria in educational events from Fundacion Instituto Roche. DAS declares being the founder and chief scientific officer of Eleven P15, Inc., a company dedicated to the early diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary fibrosis. HP declares grant payment to institution from Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd; consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd, Roche Limited, Trevi Therapeutics, Pilant Therapeutics; speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd; member of TIPAL trial management group, trustee for Action for Pulmonary Fibrosis, member of scientific advisory board for European Pulmonary Fibrosis Federation. IN declares funding from National Institutes of Health (UG3HL145266) to institution; grant funding to institution from Veracyte; consulting fees from Boerhinger Ingelheim and Sanofi. IPH declares funding from Wellcome Trust and NIHR; vice chair Trustees for Asthma + Lung UK. JMO declares funding from National Institutes of Health (R01HL169166 & K23HL138190); consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Lupin pharmaceuticals, AmMax Bio, Roche and Veracyte; patent for TOLLIP TT genotype for NAC use in IPF; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Endeavor Biomedicines, Novartis and Genentech; Associate editor for CHEST, on Program Committee for American Thoracic Society and Editorial board for AJRCCM. LVW declares funding from UK Research and Innovation (MR/V00235X/1) and GSK/Asthma + Lung UK (Professorship (C17-1)) to complete this work; funding from Orion Pharma, GSK, Genentech, AstraZeneca, Nordic Bioscience, Sysmex (OGT); Consulting fees Galapagos, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK; support for attending meetings and/or travel Genentech; participation on Advisory Board for Galapagos; leadership or fiduciary roles as Associate Editor for European Respiratory Journal and Medical Research Council Board member and Deputy Chair. MKBW declares funding from National Institutes of Health (K23HL146942); consulting fees from Genentech, Inogen, Medscape, Abbvie, PatientMpower and Boehringer Ingelheim; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Boehringer Ingelheim. MN is a full-time employee of Genentech/Roche with stock and stock options in Roche. NK declares grant funding from National Institutes of Health; grant funding to institution from BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim and Three Lakes Foundation; consultancy fees from Biogen Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim, Third Rock, Pliant, Samumed, NuMedii, Theravance, Three Lake Partners, Astra Zeneca, RohBar, Veracyte, Augmanity, CSL Behring, Thyron, Gilead, Galapagos, Chiesi, Arrowhead, Sofinnova, GSK and Merk; patent for new therapies for IPF (Biotech), new therapies for ARDS (Biotech) and new Biomarkers in IPF (Biotech); equity in Pilant and Thyron; reports serving as the scientific founder of Thyron. PLM declares grant funding to institution from AstraZeneca; consultancy fees from Hoffman-La Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Trevi and Qureight; speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Hoffman-La Roche. RGJ declares funding from UK Research and Innovation (MR/V00235X/1); that their institute received funding from Astra Zeneca, Biogen, Galecto, GlaxoSmithKline, Nordic Biosciences, RedX and Pliant; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Brainomix, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Cohbar, Daewoong, GlaxoSmithKline, Veracyte, Resolution Therapeutics and Pliant; payment for lectures and presentations received from Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Roche, PatientMPower, AstraZeneca; payment for expert testimony from Pinsent Masons LLP; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Boehringer Ingelheim, Galapagos, Vicore; leadership or fiduciary role for NuMedii and president for Action for Pulmonary Fibrosis. SPH declares grant funding to institution from Boehringer Ingelheim; consulting fees from Trevi therapeutics; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Chiesi and Trevi therapeutics; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Chiesi; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Trevi therapeutics; Chair for BTS Standards of Care Committee (till November 2022) and Trustee for Action for Pulmonary Fibrosis. TMM declares consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche/Genentech, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Blade Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CSL Behring, Galapagos, Galecto, GlaxoSmithKline, IQVIA, Pfizer, Pliant, Respivant, Sanofi, Theravance, Trevi, Veracyte and Vicore; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Fibrogen, Blade Therapeutics and Nerre. XRS is a full-time employee of Genentech/Roche with stock and stock options in Roche.
Funding Statement
RGJ and LVW report funding from the Medical Research Council (MR/V00235X/1). LVW holds a GSK / Asthma + Lung UK Chair in Respiratory Research (C17-1). The research was partially supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre and the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre; the views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Health Service (NHS), the NIHR or the Department of Health. RGJ is funded by an NIHR Research Professorship (RP-2017-08-ST2-014). BGG is supported by Wellcome Trust grant 221680/Z/20/Z. NK reports funding from National Institutes of Health (R01HL127349) and is a scientific founder at Thyron, served as a consultant to Boehringer Ingelheim, Pliant, Astra Zeneca, RohBar, Veracyte, Augmanity, CSL R01HL141852, U01HL145567, R21HL161723, P01HL11450, (NK). CF is supported by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion RTC-2017-6471-1 (AEI/FEDER UE), Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI20/00876 cofinanced by the European Regional Development Fund (A Way of Making Europe') from the European Union; Instituto Tecnologico y de Energias Renovables agreement OA23/043. JMO funding from the NIH (NHLBI) (R01HL169166). The UK, UUS CleanUP-UCD and IPFJES studies selected controls from UK Biobank under application 648. This research used the SPECTRE High Performance Computing Facility at the University of Leicester. For the purpose of open access, a CC BY or equivalent licence will be applied to any author accepted.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This research was conducted with appropriate ethics approval. The PROFILE study (which provided samples for the UK and UUS studies) had institutional ethics approval at the University of Nottingham (NCT01134822 - ethics reference 10/H0402/2) and Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust (NCT01110694 - ethics reference 10/H0720/12). UK samples were recruited across multiple sites with individual ethics approval (University of Edinburgh Research Ethics Committee [The Edinburgh Lung Fibrosis Molecular Endotyping (ELFMEN) Study NCT04016181] 17/ES/0075, NRES Committee South West - Southmead, Yorkshire and Humber Research Ethics Committee 08/H1304/54 and Nottingham Research Ethics Committee 09/H0403/59). Spanish samples were recruited under ethics approval by ethics committee from the Hospital Universitario N.S. de Candelaria (reference of the approval: PI-19/12). The UUS study also included individuals from clinical trials with ethics approval (ACE [NCT00957242] and PANTHER [NCT00650091]). For the UCSF cohort, sample and data collection were approved by the University of California San Francisco Committee on Human Research and all patients provided written informed consent. For the Vanderbilt cohort, the Institutional Review Boards from Vanderbilt University approved the study and all participants provided written informed consent before enrolment. For individuals recruited at the University of Chicago, consenting patients with IPF who were prospectively enrolled in the institutional review board-approved ILD registry (IRB#14163A) were included. Individuals recruited at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre had ethics approval from the University of Pittsburgh Human Research Protection Office (referenceSTUDY20030223: Genetic Polymorphisms in IPF). Individuals from the COMET (NCT01071707) and Lung Tissue Research Consortium (NCT02988388) studies were also included in the Chicago study. All subjects in the Colorado study gave written informed consent as part of IRB-approved protocols for their recruitment at each site and the GWAS study was approved by the National Jewish Health IRB and Colorado Combined Institutional Review Boards (COMIRB). Subjects in the Genentech study provided written informed consent for whole-genome sequencing of their DNA. Ethical approval was provided as per the original clinical trials (INSPIRE [NCT00075998], RIFF [NCT01872689], CAPACITY [NCT00287729 and NCT00287716] and ASCEND [NCT01366209]). Individuals in the CleanUP-UCD study included individuals from clinical trials with ethics approval (NCT02759120). These samples were genotyped under University of Virginia ethics approval (IRB 20845). IPFJES involved human participants and was approved by East Midlands - Nottingham 1 Research Ethics Committee REC reference: 17/EM/0021IRAS project ID: 203355. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Changes to the order of the authorship
