Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Feasibility, usability, acceptability and Efficacy of a novel leg strengthening device (S-Press) for strengthening leg muscles and improving physical impairment during hospital admission

TM. Maden-Wilkinson, C. Griffiths, B. Lakkappa, K. Walker, CL Kennerley, JJ. Turner
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.15.24301211
TM. Maden-Wilkinson
1Physical Activity, Wellness and Public Health Research Group, Advanced Wellbeing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: t.maden-wilkinson{at}shu.ac.uk
C. Griffiths
2Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Bevan House Kettering Parkway, Kettering, NN15 6XR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Lakkappa
2Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Bevan House Kettering Parkway, Kettering, NN15 6XR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Walker
2Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Bevan House Kettering Parkway, Kettering, NN15 6XR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CL Kennerley
1Physical Activity, Wellness and Public Health Research Group, Advanced Wellbeing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JJ. Turner
3JT Rehab Ltd, Sheffield, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Deconditioning due to in-patients’ stays is predictive of delayed discharges and readmissions; preserving muscle mass and strength in order for patients to remain independent should be of utmost priority. Progressive resistance training offers the most cost-effective way of doing this; however, it is not routinely done.

Objective To examine the feasibility, usability and acceptability of a novel in-bed strength training device (S-Press) by patients and staff members within an in-patient rehabilitation ward in the NHS.

Methods Using a mixed methods approach, 6 patients who performed resistance training on the S-Press device and, alongside 3 healthcare professionals, were interviewed. Data were thematically analysed to examine individuals’ perspectives and perceptions on the feasibility, useability and acceptability of the S-Press. In addition, measures of sit to stand and muscle ultrasound were conducted before use and before discharge. For indications of safety, heart rate and blood pressure measures were taken during each session.

Results Patients found the S-Press easy and comfortable to use and enjoyed using it as an adjunct therapy during in-patient stay. Healthcare professionals using the S-Press noted that it improved mobility allowing patients to gradually build up muscle strength in a safe and motivating way. All participants improved sit to stand performance with use of the S-Press. There were no significant differences observed in heart rate or blood pressure during each session, indicating the safety of S-Press use.

Conclusion From this proof-of-concept study, use of the S-Press to improve muscle strength and physiological function in in-patients is feasible and an acceptable intervention. Further work should focus on use with wider patient demographics and conditions.

Competing Interest Statement

JT is owner of JT Rehab Ltd who are inventors and creators of the S-Press device that has a direct application of this research. No other authors have competing interests to declare.

Clinical Trial

NCT06175728

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Versus Arthritis UK under Grant (number 22006) The S-Press device and JT Rehab Ltd have been awarded funding from the European Regional Development Fund through the Sheffield Innovation programme, Advanced Wellbeing Research Centre Accelerator Funding (Research England), Academic Health Science Network East Midlands and Versus Arthritis UK, Catapult funding from the European Regional Development Fund and Innovate UK Women in Innovation.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The proof-of-concept study was approved by NHS ethics (health research authority [HRA] REC reference: 20/YH/0115)

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 16, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Feasibility, usability, acceptability and Efficacy of a novel leg strengthening device (S-Press) for strengthening leg muscles and improving physical impairment during hospital admission
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Feasibility, usability, acceptability and Efficacy of a novel leg strengthening device (S-Press) for strengthening leg muscles and improving physical impairment during hospital admission
TM. Maden-Wilkinson, C. Griffiths, B. Lakkappa, K. Walker, CL Kennerley, JJ. Turner
medRxiv 2024.01.15.24301211; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.15.24301211
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Feasibility, usability, acceptability and Efficacy of a novel leg strengthening device (S-Press) for strengthening leg muscles and improving physical impairment during hospital admission
TM. Maden-Wilkinson, C. Griffiths, B. Lakkappa, K. Walker, CL Kennerley, JJ. Turner
medRxiv 2024.01.15.24301211; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.15.24301211

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)