Political Economy Analysis of Health Taxes (Tobacco, Alcohol Drink, and Sugar Sweteened Beverage): Case Study of Three Provinces in Indonesia

The current status of health tax implementation in Indonesia

Indonesia has been decentralizing since 2001—nearly 56 years after its independence(24). One crucial aspect of decentralization is public finance, encompassing various fiscal policy authorities, such as revenue generation, earmarking, and spending mandates, which has recently undergone reforms through Law No. 1/2022 (25, 26). Regarding health tax policy, both tobacco and alcoholic beverage taxes have been designed to involve sub-national governments(27, 28). Specifically for the tobacco tax collected through the Ministry of Finance, i.e., excise tax, the national government also enacted legislation to establish a tobacco-tax sharing fund (Dana Bagi Hasil Cukai Hasil Tembakau/DBHCHT), with the purpose of allocation to sub-national leaders based on their levels of tobacco farming production(29).

Table provides a summary of the division of roles between the national and sub-national governments in Indonesia. There are many types of taxes for commodities that fall under ‘unhealthy’ products category(30): (i) Excise Tax, regulated under Law No. 39/2007, in conjunction with Law No. 7/2021; (ii) Local Tax, which currently exclusively applies to tobacco products (as part of other five categories outlined in Law No. 28/2009, which have been subsequently replaced by Law No. 1/2022); and (iii) Value-Added Tax. In Indonesian case, health tax is more in line with excise tax, as one of its primary objectives is consumption control—rather than solely revenue generation.

Currently, only two commodities are subject to health tax: tobacco and alcoholic beverages. Although sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) were proposed in 2019, these have not yet been implemented(31). The national government primarily focuses on tax collection, while the sub-national government plays a critical role in tax management and allocation. Additionally, regulations mandate that sub-national governments allocate health taxes for the healthcare sector, encompassing both promotive and preventive measures(20, 32).

With the current practice of health taxation, criticisms have emerged. The health tax initiative relies heavily on the national government with the Ministry of Finance (MoF) and Ministry of Health (MoH) as policy champions(23). The reliance on the national government may be exacerbated by a limited understanding of the objectives of health taxation and complicated politics implement, particularly among sub-national governments (22, 33). The current practice prioritizes revenue generation over consumption control, especially for sub-national leaders who aim to protect revenues (20). Finally, decentralization continues to face several issues, with one of the most significant being financing despite regulations mandating health tax allocation for this sector(18, 34, 35). The financing issues include budget insufficiency and sub-optimal public insurance coverage due to disparities in revenue generation across region(35).

While decentralization becomes central to policy implementation, understanding the sub-national government behaviour in response to health tax remains important, yet understudied. This study fills this gap by exploring the political economy of health tax policy implementation at sub-national level. We selected three provinces to represent three different taxable commodities: tobacco, alcoholic beverages, and SSBs. The rationale for choosing these diverse commodities as the focus of the study is to investigate the political economy in light of their distinct attributes and characteristics. Furthermore, our focus is exclusively on the sub-national level, as there is an abundance of evidence regarding the political economy of health taxation in Indonesia at the national level (20, 21, 23, 36–39). The next section will describe the methodology and analytical approach used in this study, followed by results, and finally discussion and future recommendation.

Study design and case selection

This study is qualitative. We used an extensive case study approach as the information to be gathered requires in-depth insights and is highly contextual(40). A case study is also more suitable to answer the “why” and “how” questions which make them more explanatory and descriptive(41), aligning it with the objectives of this research.

The sub-national context is documented at the provincial level, which represents the highest tier of local government. We choose the provincial level government because it plays an important role in communicating the central government health policy while simultaneously hold a discretion over districts’ budgeting process(42). Each province was selected based on their level of consumption for each commodity (see Appendix S1). Lampung, Special Region of/Daerah Istimewa (DI) Yogyakarta, and Bali, were chosen for tobacco, SSBs, and alcoholic beverages, respectively.

Analytical approach and stakeholders’ identification

We used a problem-driven Political Economic Analysis (PEA) adapted from Overseas Development Institute (ODI) framework(14, 15, 43) to guide our analysis. This framework offers flexibility in analyzing specific policies across a wide spectrum of issues(44, 45). Figure 1 below illustrates our adoption of the problem-driven PEA framework modified from Carriedo et al., 2021 (15). We adopted the framework by repeatedly aligning it with our problem statement and findings. We identified the current policy circumstances as a challenge for the health tax implementation at sub-national level in Indonesia. The structural issues include the social context and institutional arrangements, while agency issues encompass stakeholders and incentives. In our analysis of both structural and agency issues, we concentrated on organizations and institutions, including their roles, relationships, and interactions in the implementation of health taxation policies at the sub-national government level. Ultimately, through this analysis, we identified opportunities and barriers and proposed policy actions to be taken.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1

Problem-Driven Political Economy Analysis Approach, Adopted from Overseas Development Institute

We identified three relevant categories of participants. The first category is governmental institutions, which have in-depth information about governmental progress and cross-sectoral coordination and relationships. For each province, we recruited local government’s officer who are in charge of: (i) public finance; (ii) public health; (iii) human capital development; and (iv) development planning.

The second group comprises non-governmental organizations (NGOs) or experts. The information gained from these groups can serve as a counterbalance to the governmental institutions. For each province, the NGOs/experts recruited were from: (i) public health or economic experts from public/private higher education institution; (ii) local public health or economic NGOs; and (iii) local faith- or religious-based organizations.

Finally, the third group consists of consumers to better understand the social context and confirm the local government’s effort in increasing consumer awareness. Exploring consumers’ opinions also helped us gain more information from their perspective. The eligibility criteria for consumers to participate were those above the age of consent (18 years old) who regularly consume the researched commodity. Institutional stakeholders were recruited through close invitations, while individual (consumer) participants were recruited through open online invitations.

Data collection

Semi-structured (see Appendix S2 for guiding questions) focus group discussions (FGD) were our primary source of data. This was selected based on our desire to explore a range of views, while observing the social interaction between participants(46). We conducted four separate FGDs in each province for each category of participants (see Table 1). Specifically for consumers, we organized FGDs for those aged 30 and above separately from those aged 18 to 30 to understand different behaviour among different age groups. In total, we conducted twelve FGDs between July and September 2022. Each FGD lasted approximately 120 minutes, accommodated a maximum of 15 participants, and arranged in a U-Shaped room setting. To ensure that participants understood the study’s context, each FGD began with a presentation by the researcher. All FGD activities were audio recorded and complemented with researchers’ notes. We reached data saturation at the last FGD and no additional data were collected.

Ethical consideration

This study received approval from the Ethical Review Board of Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atmajaya (Approval No. 00061/III/PPPE.PM.10.05/07/2022) and adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki(47). Prior to their participation, all individuals signed an informed consent, with the understanding that any subsequent publications arising from the study would not contain personal identifiers. To ensure the preservation of confidentiality, throughout this manuscript, participants are denoted by assigned pseudonyms.

Data analysis

We employed framework analysis(48, 49) using the transcribed verbatim from all the audio records of the FGD. We constructed a matrix to display the participants’ arguments against the PEA framework, from which we derived keywords to align with the themes and sub-themes outlined in the PEA for each commodity category (see Appendix S3), adopted from Rodríguez et al., 2023 (14). A cross-member checking was performed to ensure rigorous data analysis process. The matrix for each commodity was independently developed by at least two researchers (e.g., KPR, YBAP and AE for alcoholic beverages; NHW, AE, and N Adhani for tobacco; and N Amalia, NHW, EVA, and MGU for SSBs) based on the verbatim transcript. The matrix appropriateness for each theme, sub-theme, and categories was iteratively reviewed by all team members. Regular research meetings were attended by all researchers to critically assess our findings before reporting the results. Disagreements among members were discussed, resolved, and managed accordingly.

Structural diagnosis

Structural diagnosis concerns the structural factors that shapes the stakeholders’ behaviour(45). We identified two sub-themes under the domain of the structural diagnosis in our PEA, i.e., social context and institutional arrangement.

Social context

The social context defines the factors that shape health systems. In our case selection, where we have chosen cases based on the highest consumption levels for each commodity, this is closely linked to the underlying factors contributing to high consumption in each province, to gain a deeper understanding of the necessary policy interventions. Our qualitative analysis, conducted across three provinces, has identified three recurring keywords or categories. Firstly, cultural factors emerged as a significant determinant. Our focus group discussions with consumers and NGOs/experts revealed that high consumption rates are predominantly influenced by cultural factors, in addition to price-related factors, which underscore the need for reinforcing health taxes. Remarkably, this pattern holds true across all provinces, despite variations in the specific commodity category. For example, in Lampung, tobacco consumption is deeply ingrained in local traditions:“Tobacco is a cultural item in Lampung during wedding ceremonies.” (NGOs 1, Lampung)

This also applies to alcoholic beverages. Alcohol consumption in Bali is common during celebrations, ceremonies, or religious activities:“Most Balinese people have arak (distilled spirit, traditional alcoholic drinks commonly found in Bali) at home for ceremonies, and there are numerous traditional alcoholic beverage producers in Bali. Therefore, owning alcohol in Bali is common. However, it is not consumed regularly; it is more of a by-occasion” (NGOs 1, Bali)

Finally, in DI Yogyakarta, like other provinces, the consumption of sweetened foods and beverages appears to be commonplace due to the inclusion of sugary ingredients in many traditional food and beverage items. All three products are easily accessible at nearby stores and come at a affordable price, starting as low as IDR 500 (=USD 0.03):“A sachet beverage can be as cheap as Rp 500 per pack, relatively inexpensive compared to daily expenses” (Consumer 1, DI Yogyakarta)

A second aspect of the social context is consumer awareness. Our findings indicate that there may be varying levels of consumer awareness regarding regulated and unregulated commodities. In the case of regulated items such as tobacco and alcoholic beverages, despite high consumption rates, consumers are generally aware of the harm associated with these products, although many remain unaware of the specific purpose of taxing them. Conversely, in the case of SSBs, which are still unregulated, some consumers lack awareness of the long-term disadvantages of SSB consumption. As a common case in Asia, this is especially true for certain types of SSBs marketed as ‘healthy,’ such as dairy products or probiotic drinks, which mislead consumers into believing in their health benefits while remaining unaware of the sugar content:“In my house, we usually stock up ready-to-drink tea and coffee and consume them up to three times a week. For probiotic drinks, it can be as much as three times a day” (Consumer 2, DI Yogyakarta)

Consumers argued that due to current packaging, it is difficult to easily understand the nutritional content. Moreover, as there is no age limit for SSBs consumption, unlike tobacco and alcoholic beverages, parents make consumption decisions for children in their households, contributing to a relatively high SSBs consumption rate among individuals aged 3 and above. This common misconception among parents, exacerbates SSBs consumption as it can begin at an early age and lead to developing unhealthy dietary habits. Additionally, in the case of SSBs, advertising and packaging are recognized as two significant factors driving their purchase:“The packaging is attractive, leading to curiosity. As in case for probiotic drinks, [I usually consume] for health” (Consumer 3, DI Yogyakarta)

The third aspect is interlinked with the second factor in that consumer awareness shapes the social perception of a commodity. Regulated commodities such as tobacco and alcoholic beverages, which the government has labelled as harmful products, are also viewed negatively by consumers. Consumers have a stronger inclination to quit or at least reduce their consumption of these products. In contrast, SSBs, which have never been marketed negatively, are still seen as relatively normal and harmless commodities. Consequently, the implementation of health taxes is likely to be more challenging for SSBs compared to tobacco and alcoholic beverages.

Institutional arrangement

In the institutional arrangement, we focus our discussion on the governmental and non-governmental institutions as well as the rules that shape power dynamics and outcomes, and the shared understanding between these institutions in adopting the national government policy. We identified two categories under the institutional arrangements dimension, e.g., ideology on the health tax objective and regulation and programs.

Firstly, the ideological perspective on the health tax objective concerns the shared understanding of policy objectives among each institution, with a primary focus on institutional participants. Majority of the institutions agreed that fiscal measure through health tax is needed for consumption control, particularly among specific demographic groups, including minors and lower-income individuals. Nevertheless, some disagreements emerged during these discussions. Institutions with a vested interest in industry and trade protection expressed reservations about the concept of health taxes. Their arguments centred on the potential disadvantages that health taxes could pose to local businesses operating at a micro-to-small scale. This concern is particularly relevant in the case of alcoholic beverages and SSBs, given that two provinces also host local businesses engaged in the production of these commodities:“The sugary food and beverage industry is among the most popular in DI Yogyakarta. When Small and Microenterprises (SMEs) are asked to change their products, they will clearly refuse. Therefore, consumers are encouraged to control their intake.” (Dinkes, DI Yogyakarta)

The second aspect of the institutional arrangement pertains to regulations and programs. The majority of sub-national level institutions argued that the authority for implementing fiscal measures to control NCDs lies solely with the national government. Sub-national governments primarily concentrate on the adoption of non-fiscal measures. This is particularly evident in the implementation of tobacco taxes, where the national government clearly defines the non-fiscal measures to be adopted by sub-national governments in accordance with Law No. 17/2023 on Health(50). In tobacco and alcoholic beverages cases, these measures include smoke-free area (specific for tobacco) and limit or ban advertising.

In the case of alcoholic beverages, although advertisements are more prominently visible in tourism areas, the sale of arak by micro enterprises remains prevalent. To address the potential impact of arak production, the Governor of Bali issued Governor Regulation No. 1/2020 on the Management of Balinese Fermented and/or Distilled Beverages(51). However, the orientation of this regulation is towards industry development, rather than protecting minors from alcohol consumption:“There is Governor Regulation No. 1 of 2020, which aims to be a solution for marginalized Balinese alcoholic beverages [arak]. Many people in Bali used to consume imported beverages. Meanwhile, in Bali, we have our own distinctive Balinese alcoholic beverages, but due to regulations, they seem to be illegal,

causing traditional drinks to be undermined. [As a result] they are consumed less by our local community, which is unfair. Balinese beverages, distinct to Bali, have become illegal, while imported ones are considered legal.” (DinkopUKM, Bali)

In the case of tobacco, even though Lampung has already established local regulations for Smoke-Free Areas (Kawasan Tanpa Rokok/KTR), tobacco advertisements can still be prominently observed along the main roads. This is compounded by the fact that microenterprises continue to sell tobacco to minors. Furthermore, the implementation of KTR itself remains notably weak:“Many people continue to smoke in places where KTR have been designated. A significant portion of the population remains unaware of the KTR policy, and there are still people who smoke in hospital/health center areas.” (NGOs 1, Lampung)

Regarding SSBs, while the fiscal measure has not yet been implemented, the non-fiscal measures that the sub-national government can take have not been clearly outlined. The initiative to raise issues related to limiting SSB consumption primarily came from public health government officials or NGOs/experts responsible for public health. Even in the governmental institutions responsible for the education sector or women and child empowerment, these initiatives have not been specifically adopted:“Educational outreach to schools, especially in high schools and vocational schools, regarding health (the dangers of NCDs) has not specifically addressed SSBs.” (Disdik, DI Yogyakarta)

Agency Diagnosis

Agency diagnosis outlines power, incentives, and behavior(43). These three aspects are closely related to the stakeholders or actors who shape policy implementation. In our case, we are interested in discussing the main stakeholder’s power surrounding the implementation of health taxes at the sub-national level, as well as the factors influencing their behavior (i.e., motives) and their interactions. While sub-national governments do not have a role in tax collection itself, they play a strategic role in tax allocation and in assisting national government agencies in their areas (e.g., the Customs and Excise Office or Kantor Perwakilan Bea dan Cukai/KPBC). We have identified two main aspects of agency diagnosis in our case, namely stakeholders andincentives. See Figure 2 for a summary of the stakeholders, their decision-making power, and their motives that we have determined from our analysis.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2

Key Actors Relationship in Supporting Health Tax Implementation at Sub-National Level in Indonesia

Stakeholders

This sub-theme identifies key stakeholders in the implementation of sub-national health taxes, their roles, and their interactions (see Figure 2). Two topics have been derived from this sub-theme, i.e., key actors at the sub-national level and the power and relationships between actors at the sub-national level.

The first aspect comprises actors responsible for decision-making at the sub-national level. Based on our FGD findings, we have identified three categories (see Figure 2, the colour of each institution differs based on their roles) of actors at the sub-national level who can influence the adoption of health tax policies. While they may not be exactly the same across all provinces, they typically share similar sets of institutions/agencies. The first category (yellow coloured) includes actors responsible for strategic policy development and priority setting. At the provincial level, this includes the governor, the provincial regional legislative council (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah/DPRD), the regional secretariat (Sekretariat Daerah/Setda), the regional agency of development planning (Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah/Bappeda), and the regional agency of finance and budgeting (Badan Perencanaan Keuangan dan Anggaran Daerah/BPKAD).

The second category comprises actors concerned with human capital development (orange coloured), including the regional department of health (Dinas Kesehatan/Dinkes), the department of education (Dinas Pendidikan/Disdik), and the department of child protection and women empowerment (Dinas Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak/DP3A). Finally, the third category comprises actors in the economic sector (purple coloured), including the regional department of trade and industry (Dinas Perdagangan dan Perindustrian/Disperindag) and the department for cooperative and micro, small, and medium enterprises (Dinas Koperasi dan UMKM/DinkopUKM). In addition to these sub-national policy makers, there are actors without decision-making roles who interact with them: the local agency of the Customs and Excise Office—the representative of the Ministry of Finance in each region—assumes the responsibility for revenue collection and supervision at the local level, and the local agency of the Food and Drug Authority (Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan/BPOM), which exercises authority over nutritional value and safety in consumed products.

The second aspect is the power and relationships between the identified stakeholders. In this aspect, we identified four categories (see Figure 2). The four categories ranked from highest position in the strategic decision-making include the policy agenda and priority setting, policy coordination and planning, policy budgeting, and policy implementation, respectively.

The first category of actors holds higher positions in terms of regional decision-making compared to the other two categories. This is because they have the authority to set policy targets and priorities, which are then translated into policy planning and budget allocation by Bappeda in collaboration with BPKAD. Additionally, Setda and Bappeda coordinate and supervise intersectoral policy implementation. Actors in the human capital development sector and the economic sector mostly implement policies but can propose programs for prioritization before the budgeting process. They must provide evidence for why certain programs should be prioritized during the annual budgeting and planning process. Finally, the local KPBC does not hold a vertical position with other policymakers. However, in terms of implementing its supervisory role (i.e., eradicating illicit trade), it can collaborate with the sub-national government.

Motives

This sub-theme pertains to the factors that shape the behavior of stakeholders. We have identified three main keywords that emerged from our analysis in this domain: the actors’ orientation/position towards public health and their incentive to support the health tax policy.

First is the actors’ orientation/position towards public health. To illustrate each institution’s objectives, we have created a spectrum of the actors’ orientation, ranging from public health motives to economic motives (see Figure 2). At the implementor level, Dinkes is the main actor with a public health orientation, along with other actors in human capital development.

However, they maintain a relatively neutral stance towards the health tax policy issue since it is not their core institutional motive, but they actively engage in public health advocacy:“There are provincial and district programs for child-friendly areas with indicators that include a smoking ban. There are child forums throughout Indonesia that have actively campaigned against smoking with active outreach in schools. DP3A has also conducted anti-smoking campaigns at the neighborhood level, and there are regional regulations supporting smoke-free child-friendly areas. Disdik needs to be involved in raising awareness about the dangers of smoking.” (DP3A, Lampung).

While at the right hindside, for Disperindag and DinkopUKM, the orientation is more towards economy, in this case industry protection:“As supporters of MSMEs, we agree because this excise tax applies to large manufacturers. Therefore, it can enable UMKMs to compete with large manufacturers.” (DinkopUKM, DI Yogyakarta)

As for the coordinating bodies, BPKAD’s position leans more towards the economic aspect since their motive is to collect revenue for the regional government. We position Bappeda and Setda in a more neutral role since they both house units for human capital policy and economic policy development and primarily function as coordinators:“This tax serves as an instrument to reduce consumption or circulation. I agree that this tax should increase, especially if there is revenue-sharing. The revenue-sharing from the tax can be used for SMEs in the alcoholic beverage industry and for awareness campaigns to improve the understanding that alcoholic beverages are detrimental to health.” (Bappeda, Bali)

Lastly, political actors like the governor and DPRD are also in a neutral position due to their political motives, which can change with each election year.

Considering each actor’s motive, we can also identify their incentives for supporting and prioritizing the health tax policy. For Dinkes, their main performance indicator focuses on enhancing public health status, making them staunch supporters of adopting the health tax. In addition to the potential reduction in unhealthy consumption, this move offers substantial public health benefits. Furthermore, the public health sector anticipates receiving allocations from the tobacco tax and expects similar outcomes for other types of health taxes:“I agree with the health tax and revenue-sharing that can be used to improve the quality and the healthcare sector.” (Dinkes, Bali)

As for DP3A and Disdik, their support is somewhat conditional, hinging on the expectation that health tax revenue will be allocated to programs that bolster the implementation of health taxes. These programs could include initiatives to raise public awareness about unhealthy consumption in educational institutions or to aid women entrepreneurs in developing healthier product alternatives. These conditions are especially relevant in the case of SSBs, where there are currently no regulations in place to curb consumption, and public awareness is lacking:“For health and for the education of children, women, families in rural areas, and SMEs. Because many of the supported families also produce juices and beverages, so they can have better awareness [on the harm of SSBs].” (DP3A, DI Yogyakarta)

Conversely, Disperindag and DinkopUKM are primarily driven by the motive of safeguarding the local industry. Consequently, their support for health taxes hinges on whether these measures will protect local businesses. For instance, if the tax structure is tailored to the size of the industry, if it contributes to industrial development with an export focus, or if, in the case of SSBs, it serves to educate local industries about adopting healthier alternatives, these factors can influence their support:“It [health tax] can be used for education and development of MSMEs [in the sector].” (DinkopUKM, DI Yogyakarta)

Regarding BPKAD, their support for the health tax is more pronounced when the tax revenue can be earmarked for local government revenue, mirroring the structure of the tobacco tax. In the case of Bappeda, they maintain a more neutral stance toward the incentive, as policy priorities are subject to a bottom-up discussion, beginning with sector-specific priorities and later being communicated and decided upon by higher-ranking government entities such as Setda, the governor, and the DPRD.

Way Forward

In this subsection, we delve into the main barriers and opportunities associated with the implementation of health tax policies at the sub-national level. Recommendations for addressing these barriers and optimizing opportunities will be discussed in the subsequent section.