Abstract
Background Identifying residual consciousness in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is crucial for treatment decisions, but sensitive low-cost bedside markers are missing. We investigated whether automated pupillometry combined with passive and active cognitive paradigms can identify residual consciousness in ICU patients with traumatic or non-traumatic DoC.
Methods In a prospective observational cohort study, clinically low- or unresponsive ICU patients with traumatic and non-traumatic DoC were enrolled from neurological and non-neurological ICUs at a tertiary referral center (Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark). Age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers served as controls. Participants with eye disorders were excluded. Patients were categorized into those without (coma or unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, ≤UWS) or with (minimally conscious state or better, ≥MCS) clinical signs of residual consciousness. Using automated pupillometry, we recorded pupillary dilation as a response to passive (visual and auditory stimuli) and active (mental arithmetic) cognitive paradigms, with success criteria depending on the specific task (e.g., ≥3 of 5 pupillary dilations on 5 consecutive mental arithmetic tasks).
Results We obtained 699 pupillometry recordings at 178 time points from 91 brain-injured ICU patients (mean age 60±13.8 years; 31% women; 49.5% non-traumatic brain injuries). Recordings were also obtained from 26 matched controls (59±14.8 years, 38% women). Passive paradigms yielded limited distinctions between patient groups and controls. However, active paradigms involving mental arithmetic enabled discrimination between different states of consciousness. With mental arithmetic of moderate complexity, ≥3 pupillary dilations were seen in 50.0% ≥MCS patients and 17.8% ≤UWS patients (OR 4.56; 95% CI 2.09-10.10, p<0.001). In comparison, 76.9% healthy controls responded with ≥3 pupillary dilations (p=0.028). Results remained consistent across sensitivity analyses using different thresholds for success. Spearman’s Rank analysis underscored the robust association between pupillary dilations during mental arithmetic and consciousness levels (rho=1, p=0.017). Notably, one behaviorally unresponsive patient demonstrated persistent command-following behavior two weeks before overt signs of awareness, suggesting a state of prolonged CMD.
Conclusions Automated pupillometry combined with mental arithmetic can identify cognitive efforts, and hence residual consciousness, in ICU patients with acute DoC.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://zenodo.org/records/6627565
Funding Statement
This study received funding from Region Hovedstadens Forskningsfond, Rigshospitalets Forskningspuljer, and Offerfonden. The authors are solely responsible for the material, its content, and results. The views expressed in the material are the authors' own and do not necessarily reflect those of the funders.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Regional Ethics Committee (Region Hovedstaden) approval was obtained (H-21022096).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Details page The authors confirm the following: The manuscript complies with all instructions to authors; authorship requirements have been met; the final manuscript was approved by all authors; this manuscript has not been published elsewhere (but it is submitted to a preprint server, i.e. MedRxiv) and is not under consideration by another journal; ethical guidelines were adhered to and we indicate ethical approvals (IRB) and use of informed consent, and we confirm the use of an appropriate reporting checklist.
Concept and design: Daniel Kondziella, Marwan H. Othman.
Drafting of the manuscript: Daniel Kondziella, Marwan H. Othman.
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
Statistical analysis: Marwan H. Othman, Markus Harboe Olsen.
Obtained funding: Daniel Kondziella.
Administrative, technical, or material support: All authors.
Supervision: Daniel Kondziella, Kirsten Møller, Jesper Kjaergaard. Conflict of Interest Disclosures: The authors report no competing interests. Approval of the manuscript before submission: All authors.
Funding/Support: This study received funding from Region Hovedstadens Forskningsfond, Rigshospitalets Forskningspuljer, and Offerfonden. The authors are solely responsible for the material, its content, and results. The views expressed in the material are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect those of the funders.
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Data Availability
All study data are available in the article and Supplementary material (including raw data). The algorithm for pupillometry data processing is available at https://github.com/lilleoel/clintools.
