Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

The effect of reactive balance training on responses to novel unexpected balance perturbations: a feasibility study

View ORCID ProfileAndrew Huntley, View ORCID ProfileAlison Schinkel-Ivy, View ORCID ProfileAvril Mansfield
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.11.24302069
Andrew Huntley
130 Forensic Engineering, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andrew Huntley
Alison Schinkel-Ivy
2School of Physical and Health Education, Nipissing University, North Bay, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alison Schinkel-Ivy
Avril Mansfield
3Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
4Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
5Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Avril Mansfield
  • For correspondence: avril.mansfield{at}uhn.ca
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Trial design Pilot study embedded within an assessor-blinded parallel randomized controlled trial.

Objective To determine the feasibility of using unexpected and novel balance perturbations to assess the efficacy of reactive balance training.

Methods Participants: Community-dwelling adults with chronic stroke who could walk independently without a gait aid for at least 10 m. Interventions: Reactive balance training, using manual and internal perturbations, or ‘traditional’ balance training (control group). Training took place for one hour per session, twice per week for six weeks. Outcome: Proportion of unexpected slips triggered as intended; state anxiety, perceptions of situations, and participants’ subjective responses to the unexpected slip perturbation; and spatiotemporal and kinematic features of unperturbed and perturbed walking (step length, width, and time, and mechanical stability) pre- and post-training. Randomisation: Blocked stratified randomization. Blinding: Assessors were blinded to group allocation.

Results Numbers randomised: 28 participants were randomized (15 to reactive balance training, 13 to control). Of these, nine reactive balance training group participants and seven control participants were eligible and consented to additional data collection for the pilot study. Numbers analysed: 12 participants (six per group) completed the post-training unexpected slip data collection and were included in analysis of the pilot objective. Outcome: All unexpected slips triggered as intended.

Overall, participants did not report increased state anxiety or any concerns about the unexpected slip. Analysis of spatiotemporal and kinematic data suggested better stability following the unexpected slip for reactive balance trained participants than control participants; however, there were also between-group differences in spatiotemporal and kinematic features of walking pre- and post-training.

Conclusions Unexpected slips are feasible in research. However, their value as outcomes in clinical trials may depend on ensuring the groups are balanced on prognostic factors.

Trial registration ISRCTN05434601

Funding Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

ISRCTN05434601

Clinical Protocols

https://bmcneurol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12883-015-0347-8

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP 133577). The authors also acknowledge the support of the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; equipment and space have been funded with grants from the Canada Foundation for Innovation, Ontario Innovation Trust, and the Ministry of Research and Innovation. These funding sources had no role in the design of this study and did not have any role during its execution, analyses, interpretation of the data, or decision to submit results.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The trial was approved by the University Health Network research ethics board (protocol number: 14-7428).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Funding: This study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP 133577). The authors also acknowledge the support of the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; equipment and space have been funded with grants from the Canada Foundation for Innovation, Ontario Innovation Trust, and the Ministry of Research and Innovation. These funding sources had no role in the design of this study and did not have any role during its execution, analyses, interpretation of the data, or decision to submit results.

  • Declarations of interest: None.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 13, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The effect of reactive balance training on responses to novel unexpected balance perturbations: a feasibility study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The effect of reactive balance training on responses to novel unexpected balance perturbations: a feasibility study
Andrew Huntley, Alison Schinkel-Ivy, Avril Mansfield
medRxiv 2024.02.11.24302069; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.11.24302069
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The effect of reactive balance training on responses to novel unexpected balance perturbations: a feasibility study
Andrew Huntley, Alison Schinkel-Ivy, Avril Mansfield
medRxiv 2024.02.11.24302069; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.11.24302069

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)