Radiological signs supporting idiopathic intracranial hypertension in symptomatic patients with lumbar puncture opening pressure < 250 mm

Anat Horev, Tal Eliav, Inbal Sherer, Ron Biederko, Gal Ben-Arie, Ilan Shelef, Yair Zlotnik, Tamir Regev, Erez Tsumi, Asaf Honig, Gili Givaty
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.16.24302953

Abstract

Objective Lumbar puncture opening pressure (LPOP) exceeding 250mmH2O stands as a pivotal criterion in diagnosing idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), according to the revised Friedman’s criteria. However, many studies discuss the variability of LPOP, while others highlight the accuracy of radiological findings as a credible diagnostic tool for IIH. We have encountered many symptomatic patients who did not meet the LPOP criteria (with or without papilledema), despite having IIH-related symptoms and neuroimaging findings. This study aimed to investigate the radiological findings and clinical symptoms in patients suspected of having IIH without meeting the LPOP criteria.

Methods We retrospectively evaluated cerebral venous sinus stenosis using the conduit Farb score (CFS) as well as other radiological findings suggestive of IIH by computed tomography venography and magnetic resonance venography in female patients ≥18 years of age with chronic headaches and suspected IIH with an LPOP <250mm.

Results Our cohort comprised eighty-eight women (56 with LPOP < 200 mm H2O and 32 with LPOP ranging between 200-250 mmH2O). Among patients with LPOP in the 200-250 mmH2O range, 40% (12 patients) exhibited three or more radiological findings supporting IIH, compared to 17% (8 patients) in the LPOP < 200 mmH2O group (p=0.048).

Furthermore, cerebral venous stenosis, as measured by a Conduit Farb Score (CFS) of 5 or lower, was observed in 80% (24 patients) of the LPOP 200-250 mmH2O group, contrasting with 40% (19 patients) in the LPOP < 200 mmH2O group (p<0.001).

Conclusion Cerebral venous stenosis, as well as other supportive radiological findings, were significantly more common in patients with LPOP 200-250 mmH2O than LPOP<200 mmH2O. These findings suggest that given supportive clinical and radiological evidence, patients with LPOP between 200-250 mmH2O, with or without papilledema, may benefit from treatment for IIH.

Introduction

The idiopathic intracranial hypertension diagnosis criteria (IIH) were last revised and updated in 2013 by Friedman et al.(1). As stated by Friedman et al., one of the most important criteria is a lumbar puncture opening pressure (LPOP) > 250 mm H20. When the LPOP is less than 250 and the other criteria are met (evidence of papilledema, normal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) profile, normal brain parenchyma without evidence of hydrocephalus, mass, or structural lesion, and no abnormal meningeal enhancement on MRI), a diagnosis of IIH is probable but not definite.

According to the same guidelines, a diagnosis of IIH without papilledema (IIHWOP) can be made if LPOP > 250mm H2O, with existing unilateral or bilateral abducens palsy and three out of four positive radiological findings on magnetic resonance venography (MRV): empty sella, flattening of the posterior aspect of the globe, distention of the preoptic subarachnoid space with or without a tortuous optic nerve, transverse venous sinus stenosis. If neither papilledema nor abducens palsy is found, the diagnosis can be suggested in the presence of the three supporting radiological findings with LPOP > 250 mm. In cases where LPOP < 250mm H2O, the diagnosis is probable only if all other criteria (including papilledema) are met. Friedman’s criteria are considered the gold standard for diagnosis in most centers today. Since 2013, several studies on IIH have been published, many of which discuss the inaccuracy of LPOP and how it differs across age, sex, and BMI (2–4) (5–9).

Others have noted the variability of IIH and its overlap with chronic headache, estimating that a significant number of patients experience elevated intracranial pressure without papilledema(10–15). Although included in Friedman’s criteria, newer publications highlight the accuracy of radiological findings as a diagnostic tool for IIH(16–20). Morris et al. (21) pointed out the sensitivity of transverse sinus stenosis (TSS) for the diagnosis of IIH over other imaging findings. Korsbaek et al. (22) proposed that idiopathic intracranial hypertension can be diagnosed if two out of three objective findings are fulfilled: papilledema, LPOP >250 mm H2O, and three neuroimaging signs.

We identified a group of patients who did not meet the diagnostic criteria for IIH, most of whom did not present with papilledema, who lacked an opening pressure greater than 250 mmH2O. This group is often diagnosed with chronic headaches or migraines despite having IIH-related symptoms and neuroimaging findings. Some studies suggest using 200 mmH2O LPOP as a criterion or using prolonged manometry(9, 11, 23) to improve the underdiagnosis of patients, especially without papilledema. We aimed to investigate this specific population, comparing the radiological findings and clinical symptoms in patients with LPOP < 200 mmH2O to those with LPOP 200-250 mmH2O. We hypothesized that patients with LPOP 200-250 mmH2O, when compared with <200 mmH2O, would exhibit significant radiological similarities with IIH. This data could support the possible inclusion of patients with LPOP 200-250 mmH2O in the IIH criteria with additional radiological findings.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was approved by the Soroka University Medical Center IRB committee (18.12.2016, protocol code 0350-16). Electronic medical records of patients treated at our institution between 2003 and 2021 were obtained.

Patient Selection

We included females ≥18 years of age with clinical, radiological, and neuro-ophthalmological suspicion for IIH admitted for completion of workup with lumbar puncture (LP). Clinical suspicion for IIH was raised in patients complaining of chronic headaches, with or without visual components (progressive visual field loss, visual obscurations or blurry vision), and tinnitus. Radiological MRV and computed tomography venography (CTV) findings suggestive of elevated ICP included scleral flattening, optic nerve sheath dilatation, slit-like ventricles, transverse-sigmoid junction stenosis. Neuro-ophthalmological suspicion for IIH consisted of new-onset papilledema.

Male patients and children under 18 were excluded as we focused on the largest IIH population: adult women of childbearing age. Patients were also excluded if they had an abnormal CSF formula on LP and/or opening CSF pressure above 250 mmH2O, as they met the revised Friedman’s criteria for diagnosis of IIH. We excluded patients with other pathological findings on MRV/ CTV that may cause an elevated ICP (space-occupying lesion, venous thrombosis, etc.) and patients with partial data regarding radiology, LPOP, and CSF formula.

Data collection

CSF opening pressure, recorded headaches, papilledema, and BMI were manually collected from patients’ electronic medical records at the time of diagnosis. Other demographic information, medical history, and clinical data were automatically extracted from patient records.

The radiological data was collected by a specialized radiologist blinded to the patients’ clinical data, who reviewed their brain CTV/MRV performed closest to the time of diagnosis. The imaging was categorically graded according to the following criteria: empty sella turcica (yes/no), scleral flattening (yes/no), optic nerve ectasia over 5 mm (yes/no) and slit-like ventricles (yes/no). The imaging was also analyzed using the continuous parameters: 1) width of both optic nerves and 2) the degree of bilateral transverse sigmoid junction venous stenosis (TSS), using the conduit Farb score (CFS)14.

The patency grading for CFS is performed in each of the transverse sinuses (left and right) on a scale of 0 to 4, based on the degree of patency: 0 indicates 0% patency, 1 indicates less than 25% patency, 2 indicates 25-50% patency, 3 indicates 50-75% patency, and 4 indicates 75-100% patency. The scores for each side are combined to calculate the CFS (ranging from 0 to 8). A healthy, normal result is 8, indicating either no or very minimal patency. A score below 5 is considered indicative of significant stenosis.

We suggest the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Radiological Scoring system (IIHRS) comprising four radiological findings: empty sella, sclera flattening, optic nerve dural ectasia, and a conduit score of 5 or less. The composite score is determined by aggregating all positive radiological findings mentioned above. The scoring system was created specifically to correlate with the revised Friedman’s criteria1, in which at least 3 positive radiological supporting findings are needed for IIH diagnosis in patients without papilledema.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis tables present data summaries of main variables in the form of means and standard deviations for normal distributed quantitative variables and medians and interquartile range (IQR) for non-normal distributed quantitative variables (i.e., the measurements of the optic nerve sheaths), and percentages for categorical variables. A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the FARB score between the two groups. The patient’s medical history, imaging findings such as Empty Sella and Scleral flattening, and the presence of IIH symptoms such as papilledema and tinnitus were compared between the study groups using a Pearson chi-square test.

Primary analysis of the association between the degree of sinus stenosis (measured in Farb scale) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) opening pressure was constructed using multivariate Poisson regressions with opening pressure as the dependent variable. Statistical significance was set at a two-sided p<0.05 or confidence interval of 95%. Reported p-values were rounded to three decimals. Statistical analysis was performed using R-studio version 4.1.1 (R-foundation).

Results

A total of 88 female patients were included: 20 patients with normal BMI (22.4%), 28 patients with BMI between 25-30 (31.4%), and 41 patients with BMI over 30 (46%). Thirty-two patients with a mean age of 33.3 (10.4) had LPOP 200-250 mmH2O, and 56 patients with a mean age 35.6 (13) had LPOP< 200 mmH2O. No differences were found between the two groups in terms of age at hospitalization, BMI, smoking status, oral contraceptive use, as well as medical history (Table 1). All patients were women of child bearing age who came to medical attention because of chronic headaches. No significant difference was found between groups in other IIH-related symptoms, such as visual complaints and tinnitus (Table 1).

View this table:
Table 1. Patient characteristics

Most patients lacked papilledema, with no significant differences found between groups (62.5% LPOP 200-250 mmH2O and 69.9% LPOP<200mmH2O, p=0.407). Neuroradiological findings are presented in Table 2. Among patients with LPOP 200-250mmH2O, 62.5%% exhibited an empty sella compared with 33.9% of those with LPOP<200 mmH2O (p = 0.018). The CFS was significantly lower in the LPOP group of 200-250mmH2O (mean=3.73, SD=1.98) versus the LPOP <200 mmH2O group (mean=5.72, SD=2.35, p-value < 0.001).

View this table:
Table 2. Neuroradiological findings

Venous sinus stenosis calculated by CFS (<5) was found in 80% of those with LPOP 200-250mmH2O and 40.4%% of LPOP<200 mmH2O (p<0.001). IIHRS was found to be significantly higher in the LPOP 200-250mm H2O group (p<0.001). IIHRS score above 3 was found in 37.5% of the LPOP 200-250mm H2O group versus 14.3% in the <200 mm H2O group (p=0.025).

The results of multiple Poisson regressions are presented in Table 3. We observed a negative association between CFS and CSF opening pressure (IRR = 0.75; [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.59-0.94]; p=0.01). Another negative association was found between the CFS and scleral flattening (IRR = 0.59; [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.38-0.88]; p=0.01). A negative relationship was found between the CFS and the empty sella, as well, however, it was not statistically significant (IRR = 0.82; [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.65-1.03]; p=0.09). The association between the CFS and optic nerve dural ectasia showed no difference (IRR = 1.00; [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.78-1.26]; p=0.9).

View this table:
Table 3. Poisson regression model: association between CFS score and patient presentation

Discussion

In this retrospective study, we analyzed chronic headache patients with suspected IIH who did not meet Friedman’s LPOP criteria >250 mmH2O. All 88 participants were women, 56 of whom had an LPOP< 200 mmH2O and 32 who had LPOP 200-250 mmH2O. Seventy-seven (87.5%) patients did not have papilledema on presentation. When comparing between groups, we found that patients with LPOP 200-250 mmH2O were significantly more likely to have an empty sella than those <200mmH2O (62.5% versus 33.9%, p=0.018). Our results further demonstrated that 80% of LPOP 200-250 mmH2O had CFS values supporting severe TSS <5 (mean 3.73). In contrast, of those with opening pressure <200 mmH2O, only 40.4% demonstrated severe TSS (<0.001).

Farb et al.(17) first described the correlation between venous stenosis and IIH in 2003. He found that 93% of patients with IIH had a combined conduit score less than 5, indicating severe stenosis. Morris et al.(21) compared TSS in IIH patients to non-IIH patients. He found that 83% of the IIH patients had bilateral TSS versus 4% of the non-IIH patients and 53% of the IIH patients had empty sella on MRI versus 5% in non-IIH patients. Furthermore, 63% of the IIH patients had optic nerve dilatation compared with 4% of the non-IIH patients.

When comparing our study group with LPOP 200-250 mmH2O to Morris et al.’s confirmed IIH patients, we show similar radiological findings (76% with severe VSS, 62.5% with empty sella and 53.1% with optic nerve dural ectasia). This is in accordance with existing literature that describes a similar percentage of IIH patients with these imaging results(16, 23–25), supporting the similarity between patients with 200-250 and >250 LPOP.

Although those with LPOP 200-250mmH2O (largely IIHWOP) carry very suggestive clinical and radiological findings of IIH, they do not meet Friedman’s criteria.(1) According to the Friedman et al., in patients without papilledema, IIH diagnosis is possible if all other criteria are met: LPOP>250 mmH2O and abducens palsy or three out of four positive radiological supportive findings: empty sella turcica, scleral flattening, optic nerve dural ectasia and transverse venous stenosis. In our study we showed that 40% of the LPOP 200-250 mmH2O group had at least three positive radiological findings to support IIH (IIHRS>3). While we did not find abducens palsy in our patients, it may have been overlooked in some patients, although it is unclear to what extent.

Cerebral venous stenosis is the most sensitive sign for IIH(21, 26{Quan, 2019 #350)(21, 26, 27) and 80% of patients with LPOP 200-250 mmH2O in our study had CFS<5, providing further support that this group, or at least a part of it, should be included as IIH patients.

Prior to the publication of Friedman’s revised criteria in 2013, the normal upper limit for LPOP was defined as 200mmH2O by the International Headache Society(28). Three studies addressed normative values for CSF opening pressure and found average CSF pressure values of 155, 170, and 193 mmH2O(29-31).

Norager et al.(32) published a review of the references for LPOP based on six studies, none of which showed values greater than 200 mm(28). However, evidence has also been published that supports 250 mmH2O as the normal upper limit(29, 30, 33, 34). Many studies attempted to resolve this uncertainty by discussing fluctuations affecting LPOP(23, 35).

Others have suggested that opening pressure is affected by body position, age, BMI, anesthesia, needle size, and measurement technique(3–7, 31, 36, 37). According to Wang et al. 12.5% of patients showed an increase of more than 50mm on LPs repeated within 2.5 years(31). This was also seen in a study by Kilgore et al. who showed significant differences in LPOP on repeated tests(8). Together, these studies suggest a high range of variability and inaccuracy of a test that is both uncomfortable for the patient and carries a significant risk of complication(32, 38).

Bono et al. showed that an hour-long CSF manometry could be considerably more informative than recording a single spot opening pressure. They further showed that, especially in patients with bilateral venous stenosis, the LPOP may be less than 250 mmH2O but can reach higher pressures if monitored for 60 minutes(23). A review of 27 LPOP studies found that it was highly variable amongst patients and concluded that using a single value of ICP to distinguish normal values from pathological ones may not be biologically natural(32).

Our study highlights a significant patient population with LPOP between 200-250 mmH2O who have radiological and clinical findings supporting the diagnosis of IIH, most of whom had no papilledema at presentation. This population is not diagnosed with IIH and is therefore not treated accordingly. It is important to note that in the group of patients with LPOP <200H2O, a non-negligible number of patients had supportive radiological findings for IIH (although found to be significantly less common).

Multiple studies support the accuracy of radiological findings in the diagnosis of IIH. The most accurate findings were found to be VSS, empty sella, and scleral flattening(19, 20, 22, 26, 39, 40). It was also published that up to 48% of chronic headache sufferers have bilateral cerebral venous stenosis(41, 42). Is very likely that our cohort supports the underdiagnosis of IIH in patients with chronic headaches and cerebral venous stenosis that did not undergo lumbar punctures. This population is likely to have elevated intracranial pressure that is undiagnosed and, therefore, undertreated. Recent data suggests that it is advantageous to consider IIH on a spectrum(13, 43, 44). This is backed by the importance of the radiological findings and uncertainties surrounding the accuracy of the LPOP. Consequently, we, alongside many other researchers, propose revising the diagnostic criteria for IIH.

We present the first recent study directly comparing patients with suspected IIH and an LPOP of 200-250 mmH2O to those with pressures <200 mmH2O. While this group has been mentioned in some studies, it has not been their primary focus. Although retrospective and based on a small cohort, our research brings attention to a subpopulation that may be experiencing IIH. This specific population may be underdiagnosed and, therefore, may benefit from treatment of IIH. Further large-scale studies are needed to support our conclusions.

Statement of authorship

Conception and design: Horev, Eliav, Honig Drafting of manuscript: Horev, Eliav, Sherer, Givaty Data collection and analysis: Biederko, Ben-Arie, Shelef, Regev, Tsumi Critical revision: Horev, Eliav, Honig, Zlotnik All authors approved the final manuscript.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Footnotes

  • Conflicting interests: The author(s) declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

  • Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Friedman DI, Jacobson DM. Diagnostic criteria for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology. 2002;59(10):1492–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Bø SH, Lundqvist C. Cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure in clinical practice - a prospective study. J Neurol. 2020;267(12):3696–701.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Schwartz R, Kliper E, Stern N, Dotan G, Berliner S, Kesler A. The obesity pattern of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in men. Graefe’s archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie. 2013;251(11).
  4. 4.↵
    Abel AS, Brace JR, McKinney AM, Friedman DI, Smith SD, Westesson PL, et al. Effect of patient positioning on cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure. J Neuroophthalmol. 2014;34(3):218–22.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    Pedersen SH, Andresen M, Lilja-Cyron A, Petersen LG, Juhler M. Lumbar puncture position influences intracranial pressure. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021;163(7):1997–2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.
    Sithinamsuwan P, Sithinamsuwan N, Tejavanija S, Udommongkol C, Nidhinandana S. The effect of whole body position on lumbar cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res. 2008;5:11.
  7. 7.↵
    Eidlitz-Markus T, Stiebel-Kalish H, Rubin Y, Shuper A. CSF pressure measurement during anesthesia: an unreliable technique. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005;15(12):1078–82.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Kilgore KP, Bhatti MT, Cutsforth-Gregory JK, Hodge DO, Chen JJ. Variability of Consecutive Lumbar Puncture Opening Pressures. J Neuroophthalmol. 2020;40(4):494–7.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    Machiele R, Frankfort BJ, Killer HE, Fleischman D. Problems in CSF and Ophthalmic Disease Research. Frontiers in Ophthalmology 2022.
  10. 10.↵
    Sengupta S, Vidwan J. Overlap and Differences in Migraine and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2023.
  11. 11.↵
    Torbey MT, Geocadin RG, Razumovsky AY, Rigamonti D, Williams MA. Utility of CSF pressure monitoring to identify idiopathic intracranial hypertension without papilledema in patients with chronic daily headache. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(6):495–502.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.
    De Simone R, Ranieri A. Commentary: Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Without Papilledema (IIHWOP) in Chronic Refractory Headache. Front Neurol. 2019;10:39.
  13. 13.↵
    Chen BS, Britton JOT. Expanding the clinical spectrum of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Curr Opin Neurol. 2023;36(1):43–50.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.
    Favoni V, Pierangeli G, Toni F, Cirillo L, La Morgia C, Abu-Rumeileh S, et al. Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Without Papilledema (IIHWOP) in Chronic Refractory Headache. Front Neurol. 2018;9:503.
  15. 15.↵
    Mollan SP, Chong YJ, Grech O, Sinclair AJ, Wakerley BR. Current Perspectives on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension without Papilloedema. Life (Basel). 2021;11(6).
  16. 16.↵
    Agid R, Farb RI, Willinsky RA, Mikulis DJ, Tomlinson G. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: the validity of cross-sectional neuroimaging signs. Neuroradiology. 2006;48(8):521–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Farb RI, Vanek I, Scott JN, Mikulis DJ, Willinsky RA, Tomlinson G, et al. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: the prevalence and morphology of sinovenous stenosis. Neurology. 2003;60(9):1418–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.
    Kuzan BN, Ilgın C, Kuzan TY, Dericioğlu V, Kahraman-Koytak P, Uluç K, et al. Accuracy and reliability of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Eur J Radiol. 2022;155:110491.
  19. 19.↵
    Mallery RM, Friedman DI, Digre KB, Liu GT. Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features for Improving the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Without Papilledema: Response. J Neuroophthalmol. 2019;39(3):439.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    Maralani PJ, Hassanlou M, Torres C, Chakraborty S, Kingstone M, Patel V, et al. Accuracy of brain imaging in the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Clin Radiol. 2012;67(7):656–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Morris PP, Black DF, Port J, Campeau N. Transverse Sinus Stenosis Is the Most Sensitive MR Imaging Correlate of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38(3):471–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    Korsbaek JJ, Jensen RH, Hogedal L, Molander LD, Hagen SM, Beier D. Diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A proposal for evidence-based diagnostic criteria. Cephalalgia. 2023;43(3):3331024231152795.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    Bono F, Curcio M, Rapisarda L, Vescio B, Bombardieri C, Mangialavori D, et al. Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure-Related Features in Chronic Headache: A Prospective Study and Potential Diagnostic Implications. Front Neurol. 2018;9:1090.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.
    Raggi A, Bianchi Marzoli S, Ciasca P, Cammarata G, Melzi L, Chiapparini L, et al. The Pre-Lumbar puncture Intracranial Hypertension Scale (PLIHS): A practical scale to identify subjects with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure in the management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurol Sci. 2021;429:118058.
  25. 25.↵
    Bidot S, Saindane AM, Peragallo JH, Bruce BB, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Brain Imaging in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. J Neuroophthalmol. 2015;35(4):400–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Kwee RM, Kwee TC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of MRI signs for diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Eur J Radiol. 2019;116:106–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Quan T, Ren Y, Lin Y, Guan S, Hou H, Yan B, et al. Role of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance high-resolution variable flip angle turbo-spin-echo (T1 SPACE) technique in diagnosis of transverse sinus stenosis. Eur J Radiol. 2019;120:108644.
  28. 28.↵
    Society HCSotIH. The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia. 2004;24 Suppl 1:9–160.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Bø SH, Davidsen EM, Benth JS, Gulbrandsen P, Dietrichs E. Cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure measurements in acute headache patients and in patients with either chronic or no pain. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2010(190):6–11.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    Whiteley W, Al-Shahi R, Warlow CP, Zeidler M, Lueck CJ. CSF opening pressure: reference interval and the effect of body mass index. Neurology. 2006;67(9):1690–1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    Wang F, Lesser ER, Cutsforth-Gregory JK, Bhatti MT, Kilgore KP, Hodge DO, et al. Population-Based Evaluation of Lumbar Puncture Opening Pressures. Front Neurol. 2019;10:899.
  32. 32.↵
    Norager NH, Olsen MH, Pedersen SH, Riedel CS, Czosnyka M, Juhler M. Reference values for intracranial pressure and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure: a systematic review. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2021;18(1):19.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    Fleischman D, Berdahl JP, Zaydlarova J, Stinnett S, Fautsch MP, Allingham RR. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure decreases with older age. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52664.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    Lee SC, Lueck CJ. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure in adults. J Neuroophthalmol. 2014;34(3):278–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    Bono F, Salvino D, Tallarico T, Cristiano D, Condino F, Fera F, et al. Abnormal pressure waves in headache sufferers with bilateral transverse sinus stenosis. Cephalalgia. 2010;30(12):1419–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    Yücel D, Ülgen Y. A novel approach to CSF pressure measurement via lumbar puncture that shortens the measurement time with a high level of accuracy. BMC Neurosci. 2023;24(1):34.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    Silberstein SD, Corbett JJ. The forgotten lumbar puncture. Cephalalgia. 1993;13(3):212–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    Duits FH, Martinez-Lage P, Paquet C, Engelborghs S, Lleó A, Hausner L, et al. Performance and complications of lumbar puncture in memory clinics: Results of the multicenter lumbar puncture feasibility study. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;12(2):154–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    Barkatullah AF, Leishangthem L, Moss HE. MRI findings as markers of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Curr Opin Neurol. 2021;34(1):75–83.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    Hoffmann J, Mollan SP, Paemeleire K, Lampl C, Jensen RH, Sinclair AJ. European headache federation guideline on idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Headache Pain. 2018;19(1):93.
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.↵
    Bono F, Messina D, Giliberto C, Cristiano D, Broussard G, D’Asero S, et al. Bilateral transverse sinus stenosis and idiopathic intracranial hypertension without papilledema in chronic tension-type headache. J Neurol. 2008;255(6):807–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    De Simone R, Ranieri A, Montella S, Erro R, Fiorillo C, Bonavita V. Sinus venous stenosis-associated IIHWOP is a powerful risk factor for progression and refractoriness of pain in primary headache patients: a review of supporting evidences. Neurol Sci. 2011;32 Suppl 1:S169–71.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    Biousse V, Newman NJ. The expanding spectrum of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Eye (Lond). 2023;37(12):2361–4.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    Fargen KM, Coffman S, Torosian T, Brinjikji W, Nye BL, Hui F. “Idiopathic” intracranial hypertension: An update from neurointerventional research for clinicians. Cephalalgia. 2023;43(4):3331024231161323.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Posted February 18, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Radiological signs supporting idiopathic intracranial hypertension in symptomatic patients with lumbar puncture opening pressure < 250 mm
Anat Horev, Tal Eliav, Inbal Sherer, Ron Biederko, Gal Ben-Arie, Ilan Shelef, Yair Zlotnik, Tamir Regev, Erez Tsumi, Asaf Honig, Gili Givaty
medRxiv 2024.02.16.24302953; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.16.24302953
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area