Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Implementation of a shared decision making process for severe stroke-a mixed methods study

Akila Visvanathan, Sarah Morton, Allan Macraild, Polly Black, Sophie Gilbert, Mark Barber, Martin Dennis, Richard O’Brien, Gillian Mead
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.21.24303139
Akila Visvanathan
1Stroke and Elderly Care Medicine, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Akila.visvanathan{at}nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk
Sarah Morton
2Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Moray House School of Education and Sport, University of Edinburgh
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allan Macraild
3Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Polly Black
4University of St Andrews
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sophie Gilbert
5Scottish Stroke Care Audit Coordinator, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Barber
6Stroke Managed Clinical Network, NHS Lanarkshire
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Dennis
3Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard O’Brien
7Stroke and Elderly Care Medicine, Royal Infirmary, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gillian Mead
8FMedSci Ageing and Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Room S1644, Royal Infirmary, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Clinical decisions made early after stroke can make the difference between survival with disability or death. We aimed to develop, implement and evaluate a new Shared decision making (SDM) process for severe stroke into a regional 36 bedded stroke unit.

Methods We developed the process through four coproduction workshops, attempted its implementation then its impact on death at 6 months, discharge destination and tube feeding. We also explored patients, families and staff views about SDM.

Results Eleven people (staff and people with lived experience of stroke) attended the first co-production workshop, eight the second, seven the third and six the fourth. The new SDM process incorporated Tailored Talks (a digital platform with information about stroke and its prognosis) and an implementation plan (including staff training). We implemented this process on 1st August 2022.

Only 8/1020 patients received Tailored Talks (4 before and 4 after implementation). For the entire group there was no change tube feeding, discharge destination or death. The proportion of people with severe strokes dead at six months was higher before implementation. Twenty-one patients or family members provided views about SDM quality, but the sample size was too small to draw conclusions. Staff interviews suggested that insufficient time, lack of a ‘human touch’ and inadequate leadership explained the lack of implementation.

Conclusion Our co-produced SDM was not effectively implemented into a stroke unit and there was no change in the use of tube feeding or death in 1020 patients.

Key points Shared decision making after severe stroke is complex.

A co-produced new process for shared decision making after severe stroke was not effectively implemented into clinical practice.

There was no change in tube feeding, death or institutionalisation.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Edinburgh and Lothian Health Foundation Reference 1339

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics approval was given by Scotland A research ethics committee (21/SS/0044)

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 23, 2024.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Implementation of a shared decision making process for severe stroke-a mixed methods study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Implementation of a shared decision making process for severe stroke-a mixed methods study
Akila Visvanathan, Sarah Morton, Allan Macraild, Polly Black, Sophie Gilbert, Mark Barber, Martin Dennis, Richard O’Brien, Gillian Mead
medRxiv 2024.02.21.24303139; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.21.24303139
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Implementation of a shared decision making process for severe stroke-a mixed methods study
Akila Visvanathan, Sarah Morton, Allan Macraild, Polly Black, Sophie Gilbert, Mark Barber, Martin Dennis, Richard O’Brien, Gillian Mead
medRxiv 2024.02.21.24303139; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.21.24303139

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)