Abstract
Background In Germany, most patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are treated in an outpatient setting. To improve assessments of the health status of COVID-19 outpatients, various remote monitoring models have been developed. However, little information exists on experiences acquired with remote monitoring in an outpatient setting, particularly from a patient perspective. The aim of our ‘COVID-19@home’ study was therefore to implement and evaluate an app-based remote monitoring concept for acute and post-acute COVID-19-patients in primary care. In this paper, we focus on the patients’ evaluation of our remote monitoring approach.
Methods Patients with acute COVID-19 measured heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and body temperature daily for 28 days. Patients with post-acute COVID-19 determined the same parameters for 12 weeks, supplemented by lung parameters and daily step count. The data were documented using the ‘SaniQ’ smartphone app. COVID-19 symptoms were assessed daily using an app-based questionnaire. Patients’ GPs could access the data on the ‘SaniQ Praxis’ telemedicine platform. We used an app-based questionnaire consisting of 11 questions presented with a 4-point Likert scale to evaluate patient satisfaction. Data were analyzed descriptively.
Results Of the 51 patients aged 19-77 years that participated in the study, 42 completed the questionnaire. All patients rated home monitoring as ‘very good’ or ‘rather good’ and were able to integrate the measuring processes into their daily routines. Overall, 93% would recommend the app and the measuring devices to their family and friends. About 60% felt that their COVID-19 treatment had benefited from home monitoring. Only few patients were unsettled by the app and use of the measuring devices. During the course of the study, the implementation process was optimized.
Conclusions The use of remote monitoring in COVID-19 patients is feasible and was evaluated positively by most study patients. However, it is difficult to imagine how general practices could cope with monitoring patients with acute diseases without any further organizational support. Future research should address cost-effectiveness and changes in such clinical outcomes as hospitalization and mortality.
Competing Interest Statement
The institutions of S.H., S.M.K., P.J.C., N.D., L.N., T.E., R.G., R.K., G.R., M.D., C.F.V. and B.S.M received funding for this study from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, BMBF, grant number 01KX2021. The funder had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. P.J.C. is an employee at OncologyInformationService e.K. N.D. has received the CSL Behring award 'Translational Research on Extracellular Vesicles in COPD'. R.K. and R.G. have been involved in projects and publications using the Kaia COPD App. SK is founder and managing partner of MED.digital GmbH. He holds shares of BioNTech, Pfizer, and CRISPR Therapeutics. He is member of the commission 'New Professions' of Stiftung Muench and of several committees of the German Medical Association ('Digitalization of health care' and 'Medical Education and University Medicine'). B.S.M. has received personal honoraria for scientific consultancy to health insurance fund 'Die Techniker'. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
Clinical Trial
German Clinical Trial Register ID (DRKS00024604, https://www.drks.de/drks_web/setLocale_EN.do, 26.04.2021)
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, BMBF, grant number 01KX2021.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of Goethe Universiy Frankfurt gave ethical approval for this work (No. 20-1023, 18.01.2021)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵a Shared first authorship and shared last authorship
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
