Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evaluation of Heart-to-Brachium Pulse Wave Velocity for Cardiovascular Disease Risk

View ORCID ProfileJun Sugawara, View ORCID ProfileHirofumi Tanaka, Akira Yamashina, View ORCID ProfileHirofumi Tomiyama
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.28.24303520
Jun Sugawara
aHuman Informatics and Interaction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jun Sugawara
Hirofumi Tanaka
bDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hirofumi Tanaka
Akira Yamashina
cDepartment of Nursing, Kiryu University
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hirofumi Tomiyama
dDepartment of Cardiology, Tokyo Medical University
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hirofumi Tomiyama
  • For correspondence: tomiyama{at}tokyo-med.ac.jp
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND Heart-brachium pulse wave velocity (hbPWV) is a measure of proximal aortic stiffness and does not require the technical placement of transducers. To characterize age-associated changes and the clinical utilities of heart-brachium pulse wave velocity (hbPWV), we conducted both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses and used brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) as a comparative measure.

METHODS Various measures of CVD risk factors and arterial stiffness were obtained in 7,868 adults in the cross-sectional study. In the longitudinal study, 3,710 adults were followed for 9.1 ± 2.0 years. Repeated-measures correlation (rmcorr) and regression analyses were used to characterize associations of PWVs with age and Framingham’s general CVD risk score (FRS).

RESULTS In the cross-sectional study, hbPWV showed a stronger linear (r=0.796) association with age than baPWV (r=0.554). In the longitudinal study, hbPWV also showed a significantly higher rmcorr coefficient with age than baPWV (rrm=0.511 vs. 0.307, P<0.0001). Age-related increases in hbPWV were fairly steady starting from young adults while baPWV displayed accelerated increases with age. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that hbPWV depicted a more robust ability to stratify general cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk compared with baPWV (AUC=0.913 vs. 0.833, P<0.0001). The results of the 10-year follow-up study were consistent with the findings of the cross-sectional investigation.

CONCLUSIONS hbPWV exhibits steady and more pronounced increases from an early age and may be more effective in stratifying general CVD risk.

NOVELTY AND RELEVANCE What Is New?

Using the cross-sectional and longitudinal study designs in a large cohort of middle-aged Japanese workers, we confirmed that hbPWV, a promising method for assessing proximal aortic stiffness, undergoes a linear augmentation with age, commencing from an early life stage onward, rendering it a potential marker for discerning CVD risk.

What Is Relevant?

The stiffening of the arterial wall with advancing age is particularly pronounced in the proximal aorta and contributes importantly to elevated risks of CVD, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortalities.

Clinical/Pathophysiological Implications?

Early-life assessment of proximal aortic stiffening through hbPWV has the potential to mitigate the pervasive impact of CVD on a global scale.

Competing Interest Statement

Hirofumi Tomiyama received funds from Omron Health Care, Asahi Calpis Wellness, and Teijin Pharma. The sponsor (Omron Health Care) assisted in the data formatting (i.e., the brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity data stored in the hard disc of the equipment used to measure the brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity were transferred to an Excel sheet). However, the company played no other role in the design or conduct of the study, that is, in the data collection, management, analysis or interpretation of the data, or the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. The remaining authors have no disclosures to make.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 17H02186, 20H04086, 21K18299 (JS).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study was conducted with the approval of the Ethics Guidelines Committee of Tokyo Medical University (No. SH3450).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, [HT]. The data are not publicly available due to restrictions (e.g. their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants).

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 04, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evaluation of Heart-to-Brachium Pulse Wave Velocity for Cardiovascular Disease Risk
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evaluation of Heart-to-Brachium Pulse Wave Velocity for Cardiovascular Disease Risk
Jun Sugawara, Hirofumi Tanaka, Akira Yamashina, Hirofumi Tomiyama
medRxiv 2024.02.28.24303520; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.28.24303520
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evaluation of Heart-to-Brachium Pulse Wave Velocity for Cardiovascular Disease Risk
Jun Sugawara, Hirofumi Tanaka, Akira Yamashina, Hirofumi Tomiyama
medRxiv 2024.02.28.24303520; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.28.24303520

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)