Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Automated Methods for Quantifying Enlarged Perivascular Spaces in the Brain

View ORCID ProfileJennifer M.J. Waymont, View ORCID ProfileMaria C. Valdés Hernández, View ORCID ProfileJose Bernal, View ORCID ProfileRoberto Duarte Coello, Rosalind Brown, View ORCID ProfileFrancesca M. Chappell, View ORCID ProfileLucia Ballerini, View ORCID ProfileJoanna M. Wardlaw
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.04.24303705
Jennifer M.J. Waymont
1Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, the University of Edinburgh, UK
2UK Dementia Research Institute Centre at the University of Edinburgh, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jennifer M.J. Waymont
Maria C. Valdés Hernández
1Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, the University of Edinburgh, UK
2UK Dementia Research Institute Centre at the University of Edinburgh, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Maria C. Valdés Hernández
  • For correspondence: m.valdes-hernan{at}ed.ac.uk
Jose Bernal
1Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, the University of Edinburgh, UK
2UK Dementia Research Institute Centre at the University of Edinburgh, UK
3German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Germany
4Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jose Bernal
Roberto Duarte Coello
1Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, the University of Edinburgh, UK
2UK Dementia Research Institute Centre at the University of Edinburgh, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Roberto Duarte Coello
Rosalind Brown
1Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, the University of Edinburgh, UK
2UK Dementia Research Institute Centre at the University of Edinburgh, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesca M. Chappell
1Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, the University of Edinburgh, UK
2UK Dementia Research Institute Centre at the University of Edinburgh, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Francesca M. Chappell
Lucia Ballerini
5University for Foreigners of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lucia Ballerini
Joanna M. Wardlaw
1Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, the University of Edinburgh, UK
2UK Dementia Research Institute Centre at the University of Edinburgh, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joanna M. Wardlaw
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Research into magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)- visible perivascular spaces (PVS) has recently increased, as results from studies in different diseases and populations are cementing their association with sleep, disease phenotypes, and overall health indicators. With the establishment of worldwide consortia and the availability of large databases, computational methods that allow to automatically process all this wealth of information are becoming increasingly relevant. Several computational approaches have been proposed to assess PVS from MRI, and efforts have been made to summarise and appraise the most widely applied ones. We systematically reviewed and meta-analysed all publications available up to September 2023 describing the development, improvement, or application of computational PVS quantification methods from MRI. We analysed 67 approaches and 60 applications of their implementation, from 112 publications. The two most widely applied were the use of a morphological filter to enhance PVS-like structures, with Frangi being the choice preferred by most, and the use of a U-Net configuration with or without residual connections. Older adults or population studies comprising adults from 18 years old onwards were, overall, more frequent than studies using clinical samples. PVS were mainly assessed from T2-weighted MRI acquired in 1.5T and/or 3T scanners, although combinations using it with T1-weighted and FLAIR images were also abundant. Common associations researched included age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, white matter hyperintensities, sleep and cognition, with occupation-related, ethnicity, and genetic/hereditable traits being also explored. Despite promising improvements to overcome barriers such as noise and differentiation from other confounds, a need for joined efforts for a wider testing and increasing availability of the most promising methods is now paramount.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study is mainly funded by the Hilary and Galen Weston Foundation under the Novel Biomarkers 2019 scheme (ref UB190097) administered by the Weston Brain Institute. This study received also funds from the Fondation Leducq Network of Excellence for the Study of Perivascular Spaces in Small Vessel Disease (16 CVD 05); the Row Fogo Charitable Trust (MCVH, FC, JMW) (BRO-D.FID3668413); and the UK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Edinburgh funded by the Medical Research Council, Alzheimers Society and Alzheimers Research UK (JMW, JMJW).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This manuscript is a systematic review of the published literature on the theme. As such it uses only published data, and the doi of each publication analysed is given in the References section.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data extracted is given in the tables of the manuscript.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 04, 2024.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Automated Methods for Quantifying Enlarged Perivascular Spaces in the Brain
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Automated Methods for Quantifying Enlarged Perivascular Spaces in the Brain
Jennifer M.J. Waymont, Maria C. Valdés Hernández, Jose Bernal, Roberto Duarte Coello, Rosalind Brown, Francesca M. Chappell, Lucia Ballerini, Joanna M. Wardlaw
medRxiv 2024.03.04.24303705; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.04.24303705
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Automated Methods for Quantifying Enlarged Perivascular Spaces in the Brain
Jennifer M.J. Waymont, Maria C. Valdés Hernández, Jose Bernal, Roberto Duarte Coello, Rosalind Brown, Francesca M. Chappell, Lucia Ballerini, Joanna M. Wardlaw
medRxiv 2024.03.04.24303705; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.04.24303705

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neurology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)