Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Exploring the causal role of the human gut microbiome in endometrial cancer: a Mendelian randomization approach

View ORCID ProfileElla Fryer, Charlie Hatcher, Rochelle Knight, Kaitlin Wade
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.06.24303765
Ella Fryer
1MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
2Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ella Fryer
  • For correspondence: ella.fryer{at}bristol.ac.uk
Charlie Hatcher
1MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
2Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rochelle Knight
1MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
2Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kaitlin Wade
1MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
2Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Endometrial cancer presents a major public health issue, particularly in post-menopausal women. Whilst there are known risk factors for the disease, including oestrogen and obesity, these factors do not fully explain risk variability in cancer outcomes. The identification of novel risk factors may aid in better understanding of endometrial cancer development and, given the link with oestrogen metabolism, obesity and the risk of various cancers, the gut microbiome could be one such risk factor. Mendelian randomization (MR), a method that reduces biases of conventional epidemiological studies (namely, confounding and reverse causation) by using genetic variants to proxy exposures, was used to investigate the effect of gut microbial traits on endometrial cancer risk. Whilst our initial analyses showed that the presence of an unclassified group of bacteria in the Erysipelotrichaceae family increased the risk of oestrogen-dependent endometrial cancer (odds ratio (OR) per approximate doubling of the genetic liability to presence vs absence: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.26; P=0.03), subsequent sensitivity analyses, including colocalisation, suggested these findings were unlikely reflective of causality. This work highlights the importance of using a robust MR analysis pipeline, including sensitivity analyses to assess the validity of causal effect estimates obtained using MR.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

EF and RK are supported by Wellcome Trust PhD studentships (grant numbers: 228277/Z/23/Z and 228278/Z/23/Z respectively) on the Molecular, Genetic, Lifecourse Epidemiology programme (218495/Z/19/Z). KHW is supported by the University of Bristol and both KHW and CH were supported by Cancer Research UK [grant number RCCPDF\100007] for this paper.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The data used was openly available for use in this study, endometrial cancer summary data was accessed at https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/datasets/ebi-a-GCST006464/, https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/datasets/ebi-a-GCST006465/ and https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/datasets/ebi-a-GCST006466/ The microbiome summary data was accessed at https://data.bris.ac.uk/data/dataset/22bqn399f9i432q56gt3wfhzlc

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

GWAS summary-level data used in this study were publicly available for microbiome GWAS (mGWAS) conducted by Hughes et al (10) (available here: https://data.bris.ac.uk/data/dataset/22bqn399f9i432q56gt3wfhzlc). We used the full meta-analysis results (i.e., listed as sub-level method_em) for the main analysis and FGFP-only analysis (i.e., listed as sub-level method_score) for the sensitivity analyses, including reverse MR and colocalisation analyses. Summary-level data for overall and subtype specific endometrial cancer was publically available on the IEU OpenGWAS (GWAS IDs: ebi-a-GCST006464-6).

https://data.bris.ac.uk/data/dataset/22bqn399f9i432q56gt3wfhzlc

https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/datasets/ebi-a-GCST006464/

https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/datasets/ebi-a-GCST006465/

https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/datasets/ebi-a-GCST006466/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 07, 2024.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Exploring the causal role of the human gut microbiome in endometrial cancer: a Mendelian randomization approach
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Exploring the causal role of the human gut microbiome in endometrial cancer: a Mendelian randomization approach
Ella Fryer, Charlie Hatcher, Rochelle Knight, Kaitlin Wade
medRxiv 2024.03.06.24303765; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.06.24303765
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Exploring the causal role of the human gut microbiome in endometrial cancer: a Mendelian randomization approach
Ella Fryer, Charlie Hatcher, Rochelle Knight, Kaitlin Wade
medRxiv 2024.03.06.24303765; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.06.24303765

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)