Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Identifying barriers and potential solutions to improve equitable access to community eye services in Botswana, India, Kenya, and Nepal: a rapid exploratory sequential mixed methods study protocol

Luke Allen, Sarah Karanja, Michael Gichangi, Sailesh Kumar Mishra, Shalinder Sabherwal, Keneilwe Motlhatlhedi, Oathokwa Nkomazana, David Macleod, Min Kim, Jacqueline Ramke, Bakgaki Ratshaa, Malebogo Tlhajoane, Ari Ho-Foster, Nigel M. Bolster, Abhishek Roshan, Mohd Javed, Matthew J. Burton, Andrew Bastawrous
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.07.24303867
Luke Allen
1London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Luke.allen{at}lshtm.ac.uk
Sarah Karanja
2KEMRI, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Gichangi
3Kenyan Ministry of Health, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sailesh Kumar Mishra
4Nepal Netra Jyoti Sangh, Nepal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shalinder Sabherwal
5Shroff’s Charity Eye Hospital, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keneilwe Motlhatlhedi
6University of Botswana, Botswana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oathokwa Nkomazana
7University of Botswana, Botswana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Macleod
8LSHTM, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Min Kim
9LSHTM, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacqueline Ramke
10LSHTM, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bakgaki Ratshaa
11University of Botswana, Botswana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Malebogo Tlhajoane
12LSHTM, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ari Ho-Foster
1313 University of Botswana, Botswana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nigel M. Bolster
14LSHTM and Peek Vision, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abhishek Roshan
15Sagarmatha Choudhary Eye Hospital, Nepal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohd Javed
16Shroff’s Charity Eye Hospital, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew J. Burton
17LSHTM, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Bastawrous
18LSHTM and Peek Vision, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Evidence suggests that certain groups face substantial barriers to accessing eye care services. This study seeks to explore barriers and potential solutions as perceived by members of the population groups who are least able to access care in the context of four national eye screening programmes. We aim to use rapid yet robust mixed methods that allow us to identify generalisable findings and testable service modifications to improve equitable access to care.

Methods and analysis This is a multi-phased exploratory sequential mixed methods study. First, we will conduct interviews with people purposively selected from the sociodemographic subgroups with the lowest odds of accessing care within each screening programme. Taking a phenomenological approach, we will explore their perceptions of barriers and potential service modifications that could boost attendance at eye clinics among people from these ‘left behind’ groups. We will use a deductive analytic matrix to facilitate the rapid analysis of qualitative data. Space will be made for the inductive identification of themes that are not necessarily captured in the framework. Sample size will be determined by thematic saturation. Next we will conduct a survey with a representative sample of non-attenders from the same left behind groups, asking them to rank each suggested service modification by likely impact. Finally, we will convene a multistakeholder workshop to asses each service modification based on ranking, likely impact, feasibility, cost, and potential risks. The most promising service modifications will be implemented and evaluated in a follow-on randomised controlled trial, the methods for which will be reported elsewhere.

Ethics and dissemination This project has been approved by independent research ethics committees in Botswana, Kenya, India, Nepal and the UK. We will disseminate our findings through local community advisory boards, national eye screening meetings, in peer-reviewed journals, and at conferences.

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • We have developed a bespoke rapid qualitative approach that is designed to deliver rich and robust data with speed and relatively low costs. Our approach is based on a prior scoping review of rapid methods.

  • By using mixed methods we are able to move from rich data to statistically generalisable findings that can be implemented across four national programmes.

  • Our project is embedded withing real-world programmes and will deliver actionable intelligence directly to policymakers, programme funders, and programme implementers.

  • Our work places the experience and perspectives of ‘left behind’ groups at the very centre of programmatic quality improvement. This protocol has benefited from the active engagement of lay representatives in each of the four countries.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (using the UKs Official Development Assistance (ODA) Funding) and Wellcome [215633/Z/19/Z] under the NIHR-Wellcome Partnership for Global Health Research.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This project has been approved by independent research ethics committees in Botswana, Kenya, India, Nepal and the UK. We will disseminate our findings through local community advisory boards, national eye screening meetings, in peer-reviewed journals, and at conferences.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 08, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identifying barriers and potential solutions to improve equitable access to community eye services in Botswana, India, Kenya, and Nepal: a rapid exploratory sequential mixed methods study protocol
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Identifying barriers and potential solutions to improve equitable access to community eye services in Botswana, India, Kenya, and Nepal: a rapid exploratory sequential mixed methods study protocol
Luke Allen, Sarah Karanja, Michael Gichangi, Sailesh Kumar Mishra, Shalinder Sabherwal, Keneilwe Motlhatlhedi, Oathokwa Nkomazana, David Macleod, Min Kim, Jacqueline Ramke, Bakgaki Ratshaa, Malebogo Tlhajoane, Ari Ho-Foster, Nigel M. Bolster, Abhishek Roshan, Mohd Javed, Matthew J. Burton, Andrew Bastawrous
medRxiv 2024.03.07.24303867; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.07.24303867
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Identifying barriers and potential solutions to improve equitable access to community eye services in Botswana, India, Kenya, and Nepal: a rapid exploratory sequential mixed methods study protocol
Luke Allen, Sarah Karanja, Michael Gichangi, Sailesh Kumar Mishra, Shalinder Sabherwal, Keneilwe Motlhatlhedi, Oathokwa Nkomazana, David Macleod, Min Kim, Jacqueline Ramke, Bakgaki Ratshaa, Malebogo Tlhajoane, Ari Ho-Foster, Nigel M. Bolster, Abhishek Roshan, Mohd Javed, Matthew J. Burton, Andrew Bastawrous
medRxiv 2024.03.07.24303867; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.07.24303867

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)