ABSTRACT
Introduction Kinesio taping (KT) has been extensively applied in the management of musculoskeletal disorders. Although plentiful systematic reviews (SRs) have evaluated its efficacy, there are no convincing conclusions due to disperse and inconclusive results, and its clinical relevance remains unclear. Hence, there is a need to summarise all the SRs for the comprehensive and consistent evidence. This overview aims to appraise the overall effectiveness of KT in musculoskeletal disorders, and provide evidence maps to visualise the findings.
Method and analysis Electronic databases (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, Embase, Epistemonikos, PEDro, Scopus, ISI Web of Science) and reference lists will be searched from inception to September 2024 for the SRs of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The SRs involving comparisons of the effectiveness between single or adjunctive KT and other interventions for patients with musculoskeletal disorders will be included. The primary and additional outcome to be considered will be the core outcome set, and the patient-reported outcome measure and patient-important outcome, respectively. Two reviewers will independently screen and select studies, extract the data, and evaluate the reporting and methodological quality of eligible SRs as well as the risk of bias of included RCTs. For the SRs without meta-analysis, we will collate the number of RCTs that showed any differences in outcomes. For the SRs with meta-analysis, we will provide the original summary of evidence (e.g., pooled effects and heterogeneity) for outcomes with an evaluation of missing results and clinical relevance. The certainty of each outcome will be measured, and user-friendly maps of findings will be presented graphically.
Ethics and dissemination Formal ethical approval for this study is not required, since the data will be only collected from published literature in public databases. The results will be disseminated in the peer-reviewed academic journal, and relevant datasets will be preserved in the online repository.
PROSPERO registration number CRD42024517528
Strengths and limitations of this study
● This study will be carried out and reported following the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook for Overviews of Reviews and the Preferred Reporting items for Overviews of Reviews statement.
● This study will only include systematic reviews with and without meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
● This study will evaluate the reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews, examine the risk of bias and degree of overlap of randomised controlled trials, and manage discordant results by selecting the most representative research.
● This study will perform the assessment of missing results and certainty for the evidence, interpret the clinical relevance between effects and outcomes, and provide evidence maps of comprehensive and systematic findings.
● This study may not be up-to-date as newly published randomised controlled trials will not be included, and ultimate conclusions will probably be limited by clinical heterogeneity due to variations in dose or application method of kinesio taping.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
PROSPERO CRD42024517528
Clinical Protocols
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024517528
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82205245), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong, China (No. 2023A1515011143), the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China (No. 2023A04J0421), the Teaching quality and teaching reform project of Southern Medical University in 2022 (〔2022〕22), the National College Student Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (No. 202212121048 and 202312121264).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Electronic databases (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, Embase, Epistemonikos, PEDro, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, PROSPERO, and OpenGrey)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
