ABSTRACT
Objective Systematically review and critically appraise evidence for the association between delirium and falls in community-dwelling adults aged 60 years and above
Methods We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews (EBMR) databases in April 2023. Standard methods were used to screen, extract data, assess risk of bias (using Newcastle Ottawa scale), provide a narrative synthesis and where appropriate conduct meta-analysis.
Results We included eight studies, with at least 3505 unique participants. Five found limited evidence for an association between delirium and subsequent falls: one adjusted study showed an increase in falls (RR 6.66;95% CI 2.16-20.53) but the evidence was low certainty. Four non-adjusted studies found no clear effect. Three studies (one with two subgroups treated separately) found some evidence for an association between falls and subsequent delirium: meta-analysis of three adjusted studies showed an increase in delirium (pooled OR 2.01; 95%CI 1.52-2.66), one subgroup of non-adjusted data found no clear effect. Number of falls and fallers were reported in the studies. Four studies and one subgroup were at high risk of bias and one study had some concerns.
Conclusions We found limited evidence for the association between delirium and falls. More methodologically rigorous research is needed to understand the complex relationship, establish how and why this operates bi-directionally and identify potential modifying factors involved. We recommend the use of standardised assessment measures for delirium and falls. Clinicians should be aware of the potential relationship between these common presentations.
Key points
This is the first systematic review of the association between delirium and falls in the wider community population.
There is relatively limited but consistent evidence on the direction of effect for both delirium preceding falls and falls preceding delirium.
More high-quality longitudinal work is needed to explore the nature of this potentially complex and bidirectional relationship.
History of falls and delirium should be considered when assessing patients with incidence/suspected incidence of falls or delirium.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=309982
Funding Statement
CET, CS, SA, AM and CT are funded / partially funded by the National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester (grant number: NIHR200174).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
This is a review of previously published studies, therefore all the data used in the review are already in the public domain. All data relevant to the included studies are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information
