Abstract
Background Prenatal infections are associated with childhood developmental outcomes such as reduced cognitive abilities, emotional problems and other developmental vulnerabilities. However, there is currently a lack of research examining whether this arises due to potential intermediary variables like low birthweight or preterm birth, or due to some other mechanisms of maternal immune activation arising from prenatal infections.
Methods Administrative data from the National Health Service (NHS) health board of Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Scotland, was used, linking birth records to hospital records and universal child health review records for 55,534 children born from 2011-2015, and their mothers. Causal mediation analysis was conducted to examine the extent to which low birthweight and preterm birth mediate the relationship between hospital-diagnosed prenatal infections and having developmental concern(s) identified by a health visitor during 6-8 week or 27-30 month child health reviews.
Results Model estimates suggest that 5.18% [95% CI: 3.77-7.65%] of the positive association observed between hospital diagnosed prenatal infections and developmental concern(s) was mediated by low birthweight, whilst 7.37% [95% CI: 5.36-10.88%] was mediated by preterm birth.
Conclusion Low birthweight and preterm birth appear to mediate the relationship between prenatal infections and childhood development, but only to a small extent. Maternal immune activation mechanisms unrelated to low birthweight and preterm birth remain the most likely explanation for associations observed between prenatal infections and child developmental outcomes, although other factors (e.g. genetic factors) may also be involved.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ES/W001519/1) and the Baily Thomas Charitable Fund TRUST/VC/AC/SG/469207686 and the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No.813546
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences research ethics committee of the University of Edinburgh gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The administrative health datasets used for this study are not publicly available but can be accessed via successfully applying to the NHS Scotland Public Benefit and Privacy Panel for Health and Social Care.
