Abstract
Background The study examined the relationship between payer type, and quality of care among mothers who deliver through emergency cesarean section in rural Ugandan hospitals.
Methods We analyzed retrospective, de-identified patient data from three rural private-not-for-profit hospitals in Uganda. Two groups were included in the study, a self-payer patient group and a group fully sponsored by an international funding organization. The data was analyzed using hierarchical linear regression models comparing length of stay against payer type, and controlling for patient age, education level, parity, and indication for C-section. Length of stay (LOS) was assumed to represent a realistic proxy variable for patient quality of care.
Results The self-pay group had statistically significant longer postoperative LOS (surgery to clinical discharge), and longer aggregate LOS, or admission to clinical discharge, compared to the sponsored group. Payer type was not significant in the admission-to-decision LOS, but payer type was highly significant for aggregate LOS (p < .001).
Conclusion Case management in rural Ugandan hospitals influences quality of post-operative care for patients undergoing emergency C-sections. Expanding surgical funding, combined with effective case management approaches, is likely to increase quality of surgical care as measured by length of stay.
Synopsis: Post-operative quality of care for emergency C-section cases, measured by length of stay in Ugandan rural hospitals, is impacted by case management.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. IRB approval number HSC-SPH-20-1066 Mbarara University of Science and Technology. REC approval number MUREC 1/7
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its supporting information files
